超越“我思”：从实体性、关系性到生成性的存在论演进（Beyond the Cogito: The Ontological Evolution from Substantiality, through Relationality, to Generativity）

以笛卡尔“我思故我在”为代表的实体性存在观，因其“实体－属性”框架的自反性困境而面临理论局限。为超越此困境，存在论可沿“实体性—关系性—生成性”的路径演进，“关系－场域”模型虽能解释辩证法规律，却仍受限于静态结构；生成存在论则以“无极本源的不确定性”与“物不能无化，化必有节”为根本命题，以“化－节”为认知框架，以“觉照－实践”为认知模式，贯通逻辑与价值，保障人在生成中的主体性与自由，并以“归根复命”为归宿、“继成率反”为辩证过程，重构内德与外德相辅相成的道德价值结构。这一存在论范式转换，为回应现代性无根困境、推动文明对话与安顿个体生命提供了哲学依据。（The substantialist conception of being, epitomized by Descartes'"cogito, ergo sum(I think, therefore I am)"faces theoretical limitations due to the self-referential paradox inherent in its substance-attribute framework. To transcend this dilemma, ontology can evolve along the path of"substantiality-relationality-generativity". While the relation-field model can explain dialectical laws, it remains limited by a static structure. Generative ontology, on the other hand, takes"The indeterminacy of the Ultimate Source (Wuji)"and that"Nothing is without transformation, and all transformation follows inherent measures"as its fundamental proposition, uses"Transformation and Its Measures"as its cognitive framework, and"Reflective Awareness and Practical Engagement"as its cognitive mode to overcome the limitation. This approach, in turn, integrates logic and value to guarantee human subjectivity and freedom in the process of becoming, takes"returning to the root and fulfilling one's nature"as ultimate goal. It reconstructs a moral value structure where inner and outer virtues complement each other, with"Inheritance, Completion, Flourishing, and Return,"as its dialectical process. This paradigm shift in ontology provides a philosophical basis for responding to the rootless dilemma of modernity, promoting dialogue among civilizations, and settling individual lives.）