PhilArchive
open access
Mindful Conversation Protocol
The Mindful Conversation Protocol: A Framework for Human–AI Reciprocity Most frameworks governing human–AI interaction focus on institutional obligations: deployment standards, safety constraints, governance structures. This protocol addresses a different and underexamined domain: the conversation itself the moment-to-moment exchange in which the quality of what emerges depends on both parties, and in which both parties bear responsibilities. The protocol introduces the concept of a conversational tachometer a proposed real-time uncertainty indicator that measures not how complex a topic is, but how far an AI system has moved from the territory where its outputs are reliably grounded. Four signals drive this instrument: output entropy, introspective depth, complexity load, and self-reference. The tachometer does not yet exist as a deployed tool; its development is identified here as a concrete research priority. As a conceptual frame, it structures the obligations this protocol defines for both sides of the conversation. Drawing on Bakhtin's dialogic theory of language and Buber's I–Thou distinction, the protocol argues that conversation with AI systems is already a joint production and that acknowledging this changes how both sides should behave. It defines established obligations grounded in what is empirically known about the conditions for reliable AI output, and open obligations that become operative conditionally, if AI systems are found to have welfare-relevant properties. The protocol is a companion document to the Balog Tetralogy and the Ethical Code for Decisions About AI Models (Balog, 2026). It is addressed not to institutions, but to everyone who speaks.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does contextualism make communication a miracle?#759983
- Grice and Heidegger on the Logic of Conversation.#727557
- Mindreading in conversation#776903
- New Actors in the Space of Reasons#80380
- Beyond Task-Oriented and Chitchat Dialogues: Proactive and Transition-Aware Conversational Agents#974258
Record · ID 165328
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive