arXiv (All)
open access
Bug Finding With Agentic Symbolic Execution
Symbolic execution, in tools such as CrossHair for Python, is a powerful technique for finding bugs, but two barriers hinder its adoption: the human effort of annotating code with assertions, and the need to model the execution environment outside Python, such as an external database. To overcome bo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bug Finding With Agentic Symbolic Execution#1653057
- Understanding Bugs in Modern Agentic Frameworks: A Study of Symptoms, Root Causes, and Triggering Conditions#1199790
- A Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Engine for Compilation-Free Patch Presence Testing#1411847
- From Runnable to Shippable: Multi-Agent Test-Driven Development for Generating Full-Stack Web Applications from Requirements#1011104
- Active-SWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Proactive Bug Fixing without Issue Reports#429420
Record · ID 1659178
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive