Conceptio › Archive › Zenodo (CERN)
Zenodo (CERN) open access CC BY 4.0

Social Justice and Special Persons: A Philosophical Enquiry

Albert Ulutorti Green · Zenodo (CERN)
Zenodo (CERN) · Papers · License: CC BY 4.0
Open Source ↗
equalityinclusionlegal-frameworknigeriasocial-justice
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

Social Justice and Special Persons: A Philosophical Enquiry | Zenodo Skip to main Communities My dashboard Log in Sign up Zenodo is currently experiencing slowness and intermittent outages due to heavy automated traffic from bots and AI crawlers. We are aware of the problem, and our team is focused on stabilizing the service. Thank you for your patience. Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies (JCARM) Published May 10, 2026 | Version v1 Journal article Open Social Justice and Special Persons: A Philosophical Enquiry Authors/Creators Albert Ulutorti Green 1 Show affiliations 1.

University on the Niger/ St. paul's Theological College Awka, Nigeria Description In the Nigerian socio-legal environment, this study examines social justice for unique persons philosophically. It explores how constitutional provisions, statutory frameworks, judicial interpretations, and societal structures promote or hinder inclusion in relation to normative goals of justice and the lived reality of people with disabilities. The study is based on the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999), which guarantees dignity, equality, and freedom from discrimination, and the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities (Prohibition) Act, which protects disabled people. Nigeria's commitment to inclusion includes UNCRPD commitments. Legal and constitutional frameworks are weakly implemented due to structural disparities, limited enforcement, and cultural shame, according to the research. Accessibility impediments, insufficient compliance mechanisms, and underdeveloped disability jurisprudence impede judicial interventions, which are constitutionally entitled to enforce rights and issue binding injunctions. Special people are marginalised in education, healthcare, employment, infrastructure, and communication due to systemic hurdles. The study ethically contrasts societal dignity with the exclusion of unique people from meaningful participation. It finds that social justice in Nigeria involves structural restructuring, cultural reorientation, and active participation in governance and decision-making, not just legal acknowledgement. The study concludes that justice must evolve from formal declaration to substantive realisation to secure equal participation and human dignity. Notes Copyright © 2026 by the authors. | Repository URL: https://journal.jcarm.in/index.php/home/issue/archive | Development Status: Active Files Social Justice and Special Persons A Philosophical.pdf Files (361.8 kB) Name Size Download all Social Justice and Special Persons A Philosophical.pdf md5:42b406529d800e9be53ee13581e0e756 361.8 kB Preview Download Additional details References Amucheazi, C., & Nwankwo, C. M. (2020). Accessibility to infrastructure and disability rights in Nigeria: an analysis of the potential of the discrimination against persons with disability (prohibition) act 2018. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 46(4), 689-710. Babatola, M. J. (2023). Social Order and Legal Framework for Disability Rights: An Overview of Disabled Living Conditions and Potentials in Nigeria. Collection Management, 1-15. Barnes, C. (2019). Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future. In Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 14-31). Routledge. Bharmal, M. (2021). Judicial Interpretation: An Analysis in Context of Part III & IV of the Constitution. Indian JL & Legal Rsch., 3, 1. Birnbaum, E. G. (2022). Assessing the Accessibility of the Judicial System's Arrest-to-Parole Timeline for People who are d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing. Cerna, L., Mezzanotte, C., Rutigliano, A., Brussino, O., Santiago, P., Borgonovi, F., & Guthrie, C. (2021). Promoting inclusive education for diverse societies: A conceptual framework. OECD education working papers(260), 0_1-57. Daniel, F. O., & Unuabonah, F. O. (2021). Stance and engagement in selected Nigerian Supreme Court judgments. English Text Construction, 14(2), 231-252. Das, S., Singh, K., Kumar, R., Singh, J. N., & Kumar, P. (2024). Exploring the multifaceted landscape of human rights: a comprehensive analysis of theoretical frameworks. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 3346-3365. de Duren, N. R. L., Salazar, J. P., Duryea, S., Mastellaro, C., Freeman, L., Pedraza, L., Porcel, M. R., Sandoval, D., Aguerre, J. A., & Angius, C. (2021). Cities as spaces for opportunities for all: building public spaces for people with disabilities, children and elders. Dikrurahman, D. (2025). The Role of Courts in Addressing Social Inequality. Journal of Law and Social Politics, 3(1), 27-36. Dworkin, R. (2018). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. In The notion of equality (pp. 143-205). Routledge. Eskridge Jr, W. N. (2023). Reliance Interests in Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation. Vand. L. Rev., 76, 681. Fedchenko, V. THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW AND THE COURT: ENSURING JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW. CURRENT ISSUES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINIAN LEGAL EDUCATION AND SCIENCE IN THE PRESENT DAY AND POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION, 413. Fletcher, L. (2025). A modern theodicy: John Rawls and The Law of Peoples. European Journal of Political Theory, 24(1), 92-110. Gready, P. (2008). Rights-based approaches to development: what is the value-added? Development in practice, 18(6), 735-747. Hamington, M. (2019). Integrating care ethics and design thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 91-103. Levesque, E., & Duncan, J. (2024). Inclusive education for deaf students: Pass or fail. In (Vol. 26, pp. 125-126): Taylor & Francis. Mack, K., Anleu, S. R., & Tutton, J. (2018). The judiciary and the public: Judicial perceptions. Adelaide Law Review, The, 39(1), 1-35. Matende, T., & Svongoro, P. (2025). Stakeholders' concerns regarding the standard of Sign Language interpretation in Zimbabwe's Justice System: Implications for access to justice. Journal for Translation Studies in Africa, 7, 1-20. Mezzina, R., Gopikumar, V., Jenkins, J., Saraceno, B., & Sashidharan, S. (2022). Social vulnerability and mental health inequalities in the "Syndemic": Call for action. Frontiers in psychiatry, 13, 894370. Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Bilan, Y. (2019). Measuring social justice in the light of effectiveness of public distributive policy. Administratie si Management Public(32), 63-76. Morwane, R. E., Dada, S., & Bornman, J. (2021). Barriers to and facilitators of employment of persons with disabilities in low-and middle-income countries: A scoping review. African Journal of Disability, 10, 833. Narayanan, S., Terris, E., & Cole, D. (2021). Disability inclusion in operations. In Responsible business operations: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 115-135). Springer. Nwagbara, R. G., & Orji, C. P. (2024). John Rawls' Ethical Principles of Justice as a Solution to Problems of Social Cooperation and Injustice in Contemporary Democratic Societies. IAAJAH-IGWEBUIKE: An African Journal of Arts and Humanities, 10(2). Okata, I. (2024). Exploration of Nigeria's discrimination against persons with disabilities (prohibition) act, 2018-a legal practitioner's perspective. Onwuatuegwu, I. N. (2024). Exploring Disability within Igbo Cultural Identity: A Philosophical Inquiry. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 4(5), 593073. Osukwu, C. (2019). Disability, performance, and discrimination in the service to humanity. International Review of Mission, 108(1), 52-64. Rink, I. (2024). Communication barriers. In Handbook of accessible communication (pp. 33-68). Springer. Scheffler, G. (2021). Equality and Sufficiency in Health Care Reform. Md. L. Rev., 81, 144. Sharma, R. (2023). Promoting social inclusion through social policies. Capacity Building and Youth Empowerment, 76, 617. Tigre, M. A., & Urzola, N. (2021). The 2017 Inter-American Court's Advisory Opinion: changing the paradigm for international environmental law in the Anthropocene. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 12(1), 24-50. UDOAKPAN, A. U. (2022). THE RIGHTS OF MENTALLY CHALLENGED PERSONS IN NIGERIA: LESSONS FROM THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (UNCRPD) OLABISI ONABANJO UNIVERSITY, AGO]. © 2026 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ). 47 Views 22 Downloads Show more details All versions This version Views Total views 47 47 Downloads Total downloads 22 22 Data volume Total data volume 9.4 MB 9.4 MB More info on how stats are collected.... Versions External resources Indexed in OpenAIRE Communities Keywords and subjects Keywords Social Justice Special Persons Nigeria Disability Rights Inclusion Legal Framework Equality Details DOI DOI Badge DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20061485 Markdown [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.20061485.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20061485) reStructuredText .. image:: https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.20061485.svg :target: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20061485 HTML <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20061485"><img src="https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.20061485.svg" alt="DOI"></a> Image URL https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.20061485.svg Target URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20061485 Resource type Journal article Publisher Ivory and Finch Publishers Published in Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies (JCARM), 1(3), 482-498, 2026. Languages English Rights License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International The Creative Commons Attribution license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the condition that the creator is appropriately credited. Read more Citation Export Technical metadata Created May 7, 2026 Modified May 7, 2026 Jump up About About Policies Infrastructure Principles Projects Roadmap Contact Blog Blog Support Help FAQ Developers REST API OAI-PMH Contribute GitHub Donate Funded by Powered by CERN Data Centre & InvenioRDM Status Privacy policy Cookie policy Terms of Use This site uses cookies. Find out more on how we use cookies Accept all cookies Accept only essential cookies

Related documents

Record · ID 166630 · SHA-256 8f76d881851d0dbd
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive