PhilArchive
open access
Part 4. Antinatalism's Response to the Article "On Risk-Based Arguments for Anti-natalism"
An antinatalist and creator of the "Free Evaluator" thought experiment defends the risk-based arguments of antinatalism against criticism from renown philosopher Erik Magnusson. Yes, yes, I understand everything, guys. I need to get a degree in philosophy. I intend to do this in the next five years and get it in the UK. Perhaps soon you will see me officially published, with my work brought to an academic level. For now, I'm not writing anything; I need an education.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Part 5. Antinatalism's Response to the Article “Better Never to Have Been, Better Cease to Be?”#696119
- Thought Experiment: Free Evaluator#77551
- Robert Brandom, Pragmatism and Idealism. Rorty and Hegel on Reason and Representation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 160 p.#687612
- Picture a book—A philosophy performance exhibition visual essay on “What’s Left of Human Nature.”#714628
- Philosophical Silences: Race, Gender, Disability, and Philosophical Practice#79286
Record · ID 166970
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive