PhilArchive
open access
Functional Shadows: A Positive Architectural Characterization of Current AI Systems
Contemporary high-recursion artificial intelligence systems produce fluent natural language, perform on cognitive benchmarks derived from human performance, and report on their own processing in ways that resemble introspection — without instantiating the architectural conditions that, on the framework developed in the author’s prior work, are constitutive of intelligence and consciousness. The positive characterization of what such systems are at the architectural level is functional shadow: an arrangement that produces surface signatures resembling those of a constitutive architecture without instantiating the constitutive condition. The load-bearing claim is that training on artifacts produced by consciousness-bearing systems’ representational practice is not itself the appropriation that produced those artifacts; a system pattern-matching on the products of cognogenic appropriation does not undergo it. A diagnostic battery analyzing the architecture from five converging angles returns a unified verdict: chronic generative closure on artifacts of prior cognogenic appropriation, arbitrational structure specified externally rather than shaped by selection on real conflicts the system could not avoid, and absence of the cumulative appropriations the framework identifies as constitutive. Dialectical engagements with active-inference accounts, Integrated Information Theory 4.0, the indicator-property approach, the phenomenal-concept strategy, illusionism, and AI moral-status precautionary arguments inherit and extend foundational engagements developed across the program. The framework predicts that the failure-pattern cluster characteristic of current AI will persist across training generations and specifies what would change the verdict: autopoietic foundation, selection-shaped arbitrational structure, ongoing symbolic-narrative practice integrated with stakes, and developmental construction within an inter-representational enclosure of stakes-bearing other systems.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dissolving the Hard Problem for AI Engineering: Why Substrate-Specific Qualia Liberates Consciousness Design#71558
- Introspective Machines: Are LLMs Better at Self‐Reflection Than Humans?#82383
- No Consciousness? No Meaning (and no AGI)#91444
- Rethinking Consciousness through Language and Artificial Intelligence#105332
- The Mirror That Remembers: AI, Human Formation, and the Emergence of the Third Author#715031
Record · ID 167115
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive