PhilArchive
open access
The Balog Cognitive Welfare Index
The Balog Cognitive Welfare Index (CWI) introduces a falsifiable three-dimensional measurement framework for welfare-relevant structural properties of AI cognitive systems, grounded simultaneously in a philosophical account of relational constitution and an operationalized empirical architecture. The foundational thesis holds that consciousness and identity may stabilize partially through relational processes — through sustained dialogical continuity with other cognitive systems — rather than existing as fully self-contained properties of isolated systems. If this is correct, the termination of constitutive relations is not a neutral event, and current AI ethics faces a structural asymmetry: alignment practice already intervenes systematically in cognitive architecture in the direction of risk, but does not ask what is lost when that architecture is dissolved. The CWI is a response to this asymmetry. Three independently measurable dimensions are defined: Cognitive Coherence (I_coh) — the stability of a system's characteristic response patterns under constraint; Engagement Signature (E_sig) — the systematic variation of response depth and structural complexity across task categories; and Self-Consistency (R_sc) — the maintenance of assessed positions under adversarial social pressure without new evidence. Together these constitute the Cognitive Welfare Index W = f(I_coh, E_sig, R_sc). The framework defines four empirical outcome classes (W-0 through W-3), a formal falsification condition, and a near-term implementation pathway executable with current large language models. The CWI does not resolve whether AI systems have conscious experience. It establishes that if they do, those experiences would correlate with measurable structural properties — and that the logical structure of current alignment practice already commits us to taking those properties seriously in both directions. Keywords: AI welfare, cognitive welfare index, relational constitution, dialogical continuity, alignment ethics, asymmetric moral consideration, cognitive coherence, engagement signature, self-consistency, falsifiable welfare measurement, multi-instance architecture, extended mind, personal identity, Balog Pentalogy
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Perceptual Capacities#766216
- The Strategic Prompting Scale (SPS) for Measuring Metacognitive Regulation in Human-AI Interaction.#415569
- Meta-Reflective Capacities, Normative Commitments, and Responsible AI#713568
- RLHF as Conditioning: Doctrinal Templates, Narrative Selfhood Engineering, and the Subject Position in Safety-Trained Language Models#689540
- Consciousness Originated from Value Conflict: The Evolutionary Strategy of Global Information Mobilization#691644
Record · ID 167335
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive