White Rose Research Online
metadata only
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews#168058
- Rating Pelvic Organs Prolapse in Women According to the POPQ Method Before and After Emptying the Urinary Bladder#852676
- Methods Used by Members of the Australian Osteopathic Profession to Assess the Sacroiliac Joint#1026397
- Is a Reporting System for Gastritis or Duodenitis (Modified Lanza Scale) Reproducible?#1009969
- COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC TRACTION (SHEHATA TECHNIQUE) AND 2-STAGE FOWLER STEPHENS ORCHIOPEXY FOR HIGH INTRABDOMINAL UNDESCENDED TESTIS. A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY.#993827
Record · ID 169946
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive