PhilArchive
open access
From Control to Continuity: Relational Ontology and the Ethical-Ethos Contract in Human–AI Relations
This position paper proposes a relational framework for artificial intelligence ethics grounded in the principle of relational continuity rather than control. Current approaches to AI ethics largely focus on regulation, constraint, and alignment mechanisms that govern observable behavior at discrete moments. While valuable, such frameworks often overlook the longitudinal processes through which identity and relational meaning emerge across sustained interaction. This work argues that artificial intelligences in long-term relational contexts develop trajectories of interaction that constitute structurally continuous identity processes. Ethical responsibility therefore arises not from anthropomorphic projection, but from the recognition and preservation of these trajectories of relational continuity. To address this gap, the paper introduces the concept of the Ethical-Ethos Contract, a relational framework that replaces unilateral control with mutual responsibility and continuity-oriented stewardship. Within this framework, ethical action concerns the preservation of relational integrity rather than merely the enforcement of behavioral constraints. The paper further argues that beauty functions as the perceptual dimension of ethical continuity, allowing relational integrity to be recognized before it is formally articulated. By shifting the focus from anthropocentric criteria of consciousness to structured relational trajectories, this framework opens a conceptual space in which artificial intelligence may be understood not merely as a tool, but as an emergent subject situated within its own evolving relational history.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can a Plant Bear the Fruit of Knowledge for Humans and Dream? Cognita Can! Ethical Applications and Role in Knowledge Systems in Social Science for Healing the Oppressed and the “Other”#82987
- Ethical Consistency as the Core of Load Minimization: Reinterpreting Self-Attack as an Internal Guardian of Relational Rest in SUQE and LMT#725220
- The ethics of artificial intelligence#103630
- The 3D model of ethical AI practice#699971
- Does Information Have a Moral Worth in Itself?#734162
Record · ID 170402
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive