PhilArchive
open access
The Face Behind the Screen: What We Lose When Communication Goes Faceless
This essay examines what is lost when human communication moves behind screens, drawing on Levinas's ethics of the face, Merleau-Ponty's intercorporeality, and Heidegger's concept of being-with. When the face disappears from communication, we do not simply lose visual information — we lose the involuntary ethical demand that the other's face places upon us. Facelessness does not eliminate responsibility but transforms it from an obligation imposed by the other into a choice exercised by the self.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Affects, Images and Childlike Perception: Self-Other Difference in Merleau-Ponty’s Sorbonne Lectures#776970
- Requirements and Philosophical Consequences of the Advertisement Industry in the Media#89905
- Flexible, self-determined …and unhealthy? An empirical study on somatic health among crowdworkers#779286
- Individuation, Responsiveness, Translation: Heidegger’s Ethics#756531
- The Justification Loophole: Ethics and Justice on Social Media#79932
Record · ID 173756
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive