Jurisprudential Overview of Principle of Natural Justice in India: A Comparative Study with The Uk and The Usa

Jurisprudential Overview of Principle of Natural Justice in India: A Comparative Study with The Uk and The Usa | Zenodo Skip to main Communities My dashboard Log in Sign up Zenodo is currently experiencing slowness and intermittent outages due to heavy automated traffic from bots and AI crawlers. We are aware of the problem, and our team is focused on stabilizing the service. Thank you for your patience. Published April 30, 2026 | Version v1 Journal article Open Jurisprudential Overview of Principle of Natural Justice in India: A Comparative Study with The Uk and The Usa Authors/Creators Randhawa, Harpreet (Researcher) 1 Tiwari, Santosh Kumar (Supervisor) 2 Show affiliations 1.

LL.M. (257/PLM/050) School of Law, Justice & Governance, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida (U. P.) 2.

Head, School of Law, Justice & Governance, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida (U. P.) Description Every civilized nation irrespective of the form of government that they observe i.e., either ‘Parliamentary form or Presidential form of government, objects to secure the rights of its citizens as well as non-citizen by following the principle of ‘Rule of Law’ and not ‘Rule of Men’ . The former principle prescribes three essentials first ‘Supremacy of Law’ which means no person is above the law; second ‘Equality before the law’ which means that every person is equal before the law and classification among individual would be possible only if there is reasonable ‘intelligible differentiate’; And, the third important essential is ‘ Constitution is the Result of Ordinary Law’ which means that statutory provisions which are enshrined under the ordinary law are uphold by the judicial authority which ultimately results in upholding the Constitution. In essence ‘ rule of law’ secures the principle of fairness by compelling every administrative, quasi-judicial or legal agency to uphold the principle of law and to treat every individual equally. However, at times the statute permits adjudicatory agencies to exercise their discretionary power and decide on their own procedure for adjudicating disputes. Such, discretion may occasionally lead to procedures that compromise the administration of justice. In these instances, the ‘ doctrine of judicial review’ allows constitutional courts to intervene and determine whether the procedure employed adhere to the ‘principle of natural justice’ or not? The determination is primarily based on examination whether both sides has been given fair chance of hearing or not? And, whether the adjudicatory authority is related in any manner with the parties or matter in issue? Basically this study deals with an overview of jurisprudential aspects of the principle of natural justice and its application in Indian context along with same researcher has tried to give a blue print of comparative analysis of principle of natural justice in India vis-à-vis UK and USA. Files 9.Jurisprudential-Overview-of-Principle-of-Natural-Justice-in-India-A-Comparative-Study-with-The-Uk-and-The-Usa.pdf Files (604.7 kB) Name Size Download all 9.Jurisprudential-Overview-of-Principle-of-Natural-Justice-in-India-A-Comparative-Study-with-The-Uk-and-The-Usa.pdf md5:c374b0ae5c34272c99ad71a875f033e0 604.7 kB Preview Download Additional details Dates Issued 2026-04-30 published Software Repository URL https://cognitivethinking.in References Maneka Ghandhi v Union of India, 1978 AIR 597 Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950 Article 311 of the Constitution of India, 1950 AIR 1970 SC 150 AIR 2012 SC 1642 Article 311 of the Constitution of India, 1950 45 Views 20 Downloads Show more details All versions This version Views Total views 45 45 Downloads Total downloads 20 20 Data volume Total data volume 12.7 MB 12.7 MB More info on how stats are collected.... Versions External resources Indexed in OpenAIRE Communities Keywords and subjects Keywords Natural justice, rule of law, judicial review, audi alteram partem, nemo judex in causa sua, due process, fair trial, and legitimate expectation. Details DOI DOI Badge DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19921760 Markdown [](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19921760) reStructuredText .. image:: https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.19921760.svg :target: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19921760 HTML <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19921760"><img src="https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.19921760.svg" alt="DOI"></a> Image URL https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.19921760.svg Target URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19921760 Resource type Journal article Publisher Zenodo Published in Cognitive Thinking: An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 49-55, ISSN: 3107-5088, 2026. Languages English Rights License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International The Creative Commons Attribution license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the condition that the creator is appropriately credited. Read more Copyright Harpreet Randhawa &amp; Dr Santosh Kumar Tiwari Citation Export Technical metadata Created April 30, 2026 Modified April 30, 2026 Jump up About About Policies Infrastructure Principles Projects Roadmap Contact Blog Blog Support Help FAQ Developers REST API OAI-PMH Contribute GitHub Donate Funded by Powered by CERN Data Centre & InvenioRDM Status Privacy policy Cookie policy Terms of Use This site uses cookies. Find out more on how we use cookies Accept all cookies Accept only essential cookies

Related documents

• Accessing justice in Kenya: An analysis of case backlog in Nakuru environment and land court#938593
• Mohandas K Gandhi. Non-violence, principles, and chamber pots.#98821
• Beyond Counting Deaths: Why India must Strengthen Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems for Equitable Health Governance.#659655
• From Digital Public Infrastructure to AI Governance: Lessons from India for the Global South#297810
• Balancing Development and Environment: A Doctrinal Analysis of Bangladesh's EIA Legal Regime#386466