NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Evaluation of the performance of large language models in responding to medical questions related to multiple sclerosis: A case study of large language models including ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Copilot.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- User Beware: Inaccuracy and Inconsistency of Large Language Models in Providing Precision Dosing Recommendations for Patients With Kidney Impairment-A Case Series.#1166962
- Tracking AI/LLM Literacy and Knowledge in Urology Outpatients (TALK-U)#1009916
- Large Language Models in Healthcare and Medical Applications: A Review#376936
- Comparison of the performance of ChatGPT-5, Gemini 3, Copilot, Perplexity, and medical students in answering neurology questions: a cross-sectional study.#227941
- Right Answer, Wrong Reason: Accuracy, Consistency, and Consensus Are Misleading Indicators of LLM Faithfulness in Clinical Decision Support#1117148
Record · ID 174400
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive