PhilArchive
open access
Control as Safety (the Predictability Principle)
It appears that almost all people operating outside of psychological safety exhibit a regulatory drive to either control or be controlled—the mind’s mechanism for attempting to restore safety by increasing predictability in light of perceived danger. This “control drive” appears to derive from the autonomic nervous system’s attempts to restore felt-safety and, although at times maladaptive, seemingly (re-)creates power dynamics across scales ranging from interpersonal relations to geopolitics. This framework may explain behaviours not fully captured by existing theories.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Understanding vigilance and its decrement: theoretical, contextual, and neural insights.#305305
- Safety learning produces rapid fear suppression and distinct amygdala-prefrontal engagement#660910
- Danger signals for untrustworthy thought experiments#111424
- ◉ The Puppeteer Mind - Dualism, Neural Dependence, and the Explanatory Redundancy of Immaterial Control#688699
- Why Safety-First AI Governance Risks Producing Unsafe Systems#692739
Record · ID 17568
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive