The Causality Game: Redefining Academics as a Game with Causality as its Rule Based on Blind Faith

(Upgraded on April 13, 2026!) This paper proposes a comprehensive framework called the Causality Game. This framework redefines academics as a game in which blind faith in causality is a rule. The crisis of academics caused by Hume's viewing causality as a mere rule of thumb is resolved by this. Also, the Causality Game is the first time in history that causality is mandated in academics. Since the beginning of history, academics has possessed a structural vulnerability: the lack of any absolute ground for adopting causality. The redefinition provided by the Causality Game resolves this issue as well. It is shown that when the prerequisites collapse, descriptions cannot be handled by humans. It is impossible to reach the truth through the thoroughness of causality. However, description has no choice but the thoroughness of causality. This becomes a warning to science and philosophy, where the neglect of causality is accelerating. Furthermore, the universe based on causality is defined. The universe is composed of minimum units and spatial relationships. Based on these, structure, intelligence, and consciousness are analyzed. While ontology is deterministic, epistemology leaves room for freedom due to the imperfection of perception. Based on the structure, the concepts of profit and loss are derived. The dynamics of freedom and power are examined. Negotiation, violence, and community are also considered. This paper strongly demands the thoroughness of causality in all academics. This provides humanity with the benefits of academics and a foundation for shareable recognition. I believe the Causality Game will be to my personal profit. And this profit will be shareable with the selfishness of many people.