PhilArchive
open access
Computer says "No": The Case Against Empathetic Conversational AI
Emotions are an integral part of human cognition and they guide not only our understanding of the world but also our actions within it. As such, whether we soothe or flame an emotion is not inconsequential. Recent work in conversational AI has focused on responding empathetically to users, validating and soothing their emotions without a real basis. This AI-aided emotional regulation can have negative consequences for users and society, tending towards a one-noted happiness defined as only the absence of "negative" emotions. We argue that we must carefully consider whether and how to respond to users' emotions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reasons to Respond to AI Emotional Expressions#714179
- Tool or Companion? Reframing Conversational AI to Prevent Psychological Harm.#685811
- Tool or Companion? Reframing Conversational AI to Prevent Psychological Harm#31133
- Customer Mistreatment and Venting to Conversational AI: Emotional Exhaustion as Mediator and Trust in Conversational AI as Moderator.#140450
- Exploring Human and AI Emotional Support Through Reframing of Negative Situations#345569
Record · ID 17704
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive