PhilArchive
open access
Bias Reduction as an Aesthetic Norm
Traditional aesthetic theories emphasize pleasure, while recent non-hedonistic approaches prioritize “getting it right” in aesthetic engagement. This paper critiques Dominic McIver Lopes and C. ThiNguyen’s theories by arguing that correctness is neither the necessary guiding norm nor the constitutive or right motivator. Instead, it proposes bias reduction—minimizing the improper influence of prior outlooks. This shift from correctness to minimizing distortion better captures aesthetic agency and allows for pluralism and radical disagreement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Directions For A New Aestheticism#760233
- The Beauty Bias and Leader Emergence: A Theoretical Integration, Extension, and Meta-Analysis#68380
- Remarks on Santayana's Influence on the Development of the Barnes Foundation's Aesthetics Theories#72848
- The Aesthetic and Cognitive Value of Surprise#718936
- Beauty#89161
Record · ID 17765
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive