PhilArchive
open access
A short note on the significance of the Penrose-halting theorem
In The Emperor’s New Mind [Penrose, 1989], Roger Penrose proves a variant of the halting problem, and uses it to argue that humans have cognitive capacities beyond the computable. In this short note I explicate his argument, and show how it fails, via a corollary of his result. My response to Penrose is in fact of a kind with a number of prior responses: he assumes human powers, that (as the corollary shows) no computer could have. However, as far as I am aware, no one has previously addressed this specific form of the argument, in the direct way that I will.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Analog to Digital Computing: Is Homo sapiens’ Brain on Its Way to Become a Turing Machine?#94531
- Recursive Datum Expansion and the Structural Interpretation of Time#713956
- Halting problem undecidability and infinitely nested simulation#757830
- Does God Play Dice? Roger Penrose, Quantum Consciousness, and the Debate Over the Limits of Science#733823
- Bridging the Gap Between Plain VASS and Branching VASS#1109905
Record · ID 17794
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive