PhilArchive
open access
The Principle of Compliance: Differentiating Racist and Humanistic Discourses
When people share the same knowledge and culture, it is difficult to distinguish whether their national speech is humanitarian or racist. Such things make it easy for people to accept unhumanitarian speech just because it stems from their culture. Hence, the purpose of this investigation is to give readers a tool to assist them in discriminating between discourses that are racist and those that are humanitarian. It is called the principle of compliance. The principle said that if all nations and different cultures apply this discourse, what will be the overall result in respect for people’s lives and plant resources? Does this discourse encourage greater goodness or evil?. Goodness has been defined as preserving humanity and the Earth's natural resources.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ecocentric Bias and the Human Welfare: Reintegrating Human Welfare into Environmental Conservation Discourse#110605
- Should Atrocious Speech Be Legally Protected?#730727
- Framing Food Justice#766573
- Is free speech a problem?#76473
- Is Discrimination Harmful?#76373
Record · ID 17832
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive