Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (OAI Expanded)
arXiv (OAI Expanded) open access

Too good to be true: People reject free gifts from robots because they infer bad intentions

Lebrun, Benjamin et al. · arxiv_oai_expanded
arXiv (OAI Expanded) · Papers
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
human-computer-interaction
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2404.07409] Too good to be true: People reject free gifts from robots because they infer bad intentions Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction arXiv:2404.07409 (cs) [Submitted on 11 Apr 2024] Title: Too good to be true: People reject free gifts from robots because they infer bad intentions Authors: Benjamin Lebrun , Andrew Vonasch , Christoph Bartneck View a PDF of the paper titled Too good to be true: People reject free gifts from robots because they infer bad intentions, by Benjamin Lebrun and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: A recent psychology study found that people sometimes reject overly generous offers from people because they imagine hidden ''phantom costs'' must be part of the transaction. Phantom costs occur when a person seems overly generous for no apparent reason. This study aims to explore whether people can imagine phantom costs when interacting with a robot. To this end, screen or physically embodied agents (human or robot) offered to people either a cookie or a cookie + \$2. Participants were then asked to make a choice whether they would accept or decline the offer. Results showed that people did perceive phantom costs in the offer + \$2 conditions when interacting with a human, but also with a robot, across both embodiment levels, leading to the characteristic behavioral effect that offering more money made people less likely to accept the offer. While people were more likely to accept offers from a robot than from a human, people more often accepted offers from humans when they were physically compared to screen embodied but were equally likely to accept the offer from a robot whether it was screen or physically embodied. This suggests that people can treat robots (and humans) as social agents with hidden intentions and knowledge, and that this influences their behavior toward them. This provides not only new insights on how people make decisions when interacting with a robot but also how robot embodiment impacts HRI research. Comments: 35 pages, 6 figures Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2404.07409 [cs.HC] (or arXiv:2404.07409v1 [cs.HC] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.07409 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Journal reference: International Journal of Social Robotics, Volume 18, article number 58, (2026) Related DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-026-01395-x Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Benjamin Lebrun [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 11 Apr 2024 00:49:08 UTC (2,616 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Too good to be true: People reject free gifts from robots because they infer bad intentions, by Benjamin Lebrun and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.HC < prev | next > new | recent | 2024-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

Record · ID 189132 · SHA-256 661ac876651f2717
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive