Figshare
open access
Reviewability: A Conceptual Clarification within Criteriology
administrative-lawjurisprudence-and-legal-interpretationlaw-and-society-and-socio-legal-researchlegal-theorypublic-administrationscience-and-technology-policysocial-theory
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
2026-09-14T09:08:45Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai The request includes illegal arguments, is missing required arguments, includes a repeated argument, or values for arguments have an illegal syntax.
Related documents
- An Audacious Review#90838
- Review: Being good in a world of need#82694
- Discipline, Determination, Discernment: In Reply#772467
- Default-filled outcome labels in a deployed cognitive-screening programme: an operator-level audit and the construction of twenty-four language-model arms#1149590
- From Knowability to Conjecturability, and Back Again#102637
Record · ID 194318 · SHA-256 3814bd76bf794ae5
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive