PhilArchive
open access
Sonicismo Tímbrico e Instrumentalismo
The problem concerning the ‘individuation conditions of musical works’ is pressing and actual in the metaphysical discussion, in the philosophy of music. In this essay we address two entirely different perspectives: ‘timbric sonicism’, as formulated by Julian Dodd and ‘instrumentalism’, as sketched by Stephen Davies. We attempt to show that there are strong reasons to consider that the objections to anti-instrumentalism and anti-contextualism, derived from the sonicist formalism, support ‘instrumentalism’ as a plausible answer to the set of conditions, requisites or essential properties in the determination of the entities that are well-formed musical works.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sonicismo Tímbrico e Instrumentalismo: Uma Disputa Ontológica#694029
- Ladri di musica. Filosofia, musica e plagio#724395
- Introduction: la danse a-t-elle une philosophie?#743463
- Perception musicale et plaisir esthétique au siècle des Lumières#81723
- Formenlehre der Musik#365565
Record · ID 203993
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive