Response to NWG/RFC 67
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
Network Working Group S. Crocker Request for Comments #73 UCLA 25 Sept. 70
Response to NWM/RFC #67
Bill's suggestion is a good one; however, my current policy is to encourage the most rapid implementation of the protocol in document #1, and his suggested modification should be delayed. It seems to me most important to gain experience using the network before making changes to the protocol which are not dictated by necessity. (I polled several sites regarding Bill's suggestion. Sites with NCP implementations under way tended to agree with this policy, while sites further behind tended to desire Bill's suggested change.)
With respect to changes, in general, I believe that changes are necessary to improve the efficiency, provide greater flexibility, and guarantee reliability. Many of us can suggest changes now, but I suspect that clearer ideas will emerge from usage.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Josh Elliott 1/98 ]
Related documents
- Response to RFC 116: May NWG meeting#189831
- Response to NWG/RFC 110#136694
- List of NWG/RFC's 1-80#139251
- BBN's Comments on NWG/RFC #33#500733
- Response to NWG/RFC 346#212029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive