PhilArchive
open access
Fitting Guilt Without Blameworthiness
The standard account of guilt states that it is fitting (and/or deserved) for an agent to feel the emotion of guilt only if she is blameworthy. This chapter proposes and defends the Moral Debt Account of guilt, according to which guilt is fitting when an agent has a moral debt in virtue of a disrupted moral relationship. This allows for guilt to be fitting when the agent is morally innocent, for example, when she is in a state of epistemic uncertainty, possesses inequitable benefits, or all-things-considered justifiably harms or wrongs another. Furthermore, the Moral Debt Account has the resources to accommodate the intuition that agents do not deserve to suffer the pain of guilt when they are not blameworthy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Guilty Confessions#772980
- Survivor guilt#77600
- Ignorance, Revision, and Common Sense#711207
- Causal Involvement, Collectives, and Blame#728905
- Evil and Forgiveness#757294
Record · ID 209871
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive