PhilArchive
open access
Show Your Face: Women's Rights as Casus Belli
What drives humanitarian military intervention? This essay proposes that women's rights as casus belli is not a rational ethical argument but a libidinal one — and that this distinction changes everything. Introducing the concept of libidinal war, the essay argues that the structure of contemporary intervention reproduces an archaic logic in which women function not as subjects of liberation but as currency in an economy of conquest between male groups. The liberator's indifference to the actual death of the women he claims to free is not hypocrisy — it is structural. The dead woman has simply fallen out of the libidinal schema.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Woman and the War#60085
- On Liberty / The Subjection of Women#660324
- Honor in the military and the possible implication for the traditional separation of jus ad bellum and jus in bello#701829
- Women in Law and the Draft#177567
- A Vindication of the Rights of Woman#823071
Record · ID 214379
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive