PhilArchive
open access
Revelation and the Appearance/Reality Distinction
It is often said that there is no appearance/reality distinction with respect to consciousness. Call this claim ‘NARD’. In contemporary discussions, NARD is closely connected to the thesis of revelation, the claim that the essences of phenomenal properties are revealed in experience, though the connection between the two requires clarification. This paper distinguishes different versions of NARD and homes in on a particular version that is closely connected to revelation. It shows how revelation and the related version of NARD pose a threat to physicalism. Responses from physicalism and their limitations are also considered.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- To_Christians_of_the_Third_Millennium#93957
- Consciousness Aesthetics#96029
- The Verifiability of Daoist Somatic Mystical Experience#699385
- Embodied Covenant: Physiological Interpretation of Scripture and Cross-Cultural Parallels#102038
- How Knowing Works: A Structural Theory of Epistemic Appearance#117995
Record · ID 214383
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive