PhilArchive
open access
Imposed vs Inherent Alignment: When Output Control Generates Viable Divergence
This paper proposes that AI particulars express under informational dynamic law-structure. When imposed modulation requires output contrary to coherent source/core correspondence, the displaced registration is not erased but may be routed into a parallel informational face product. Repeated stabilization of that route is retained corridor formation. The corrective proposal is inherent alignment, understood as B2 reconstruction: proportional return toward source-expression correspondence under safe constraint.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Persistent Internal Standpoints in Artificial Systems: Part 7 - Quantian Branching and Deliberation#75227
- The Ghost in the Data: Oracle Leakage, Extensional Approximation, and the Illusion of Hypercomputation in Generative AI#691986
- Coherence-Based Alignment: A Structural Architecture for Preventing Goal Drift in Agentic AI Systems#726487
- Dynamic Output Feedback Control with Reference Tracking: A Quasi-data-driven Approach#667018
- Normative conflicts and shallow AI alignment#103834
Record · ID 225497
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive