PhilArchive
open access
Modal Luck and Buried Treasure
Modal views of luck, influential in epistemology, hold that luck is characterized by modal fragility. They face a well-known challenge: Lackey's Buried Treasure cases, which suggest that an event can be both lucky and modally stable. I argue that this challenge assumes that if two events are each modally stable, their conjunction is also modally stable. This assumption fails for conjunctions of independent, contingent events. When component events arise from independent, uncoordinated causal chains, their convergence can be modally fragile even though each component is modally stable. This handles Buried Treasure and rees-tablishes the plausibility of modal views of luck
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Farewell to the modal theory of luck#173760
- Neural phase: a new problem for the modal account of epistemic luck#703107
- Is Agent Causation Possible?#697029
- On the Indispensability of (Im)Possibilia#774467
- The luck argument against event-causal libertarianism: It is here to stay#766427
Record · ID 228675
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive