PhilArchive
open access
The Non-Spatiality of Entanglement: An Ontological Reframing of Bell-type Nonlocality
Bell’s theorem and the experimental violations of its inequalities are commonly taken to establish that nature is nonlocal. This article does not contest the theorem, the experimental record, or the empirical correlations they certify. It contests the ontological inference that moves from those data to the metaphysical thesis that reality contains superluminal influences between spatially separated particles. The article applies, to Bell-type entanglement, the same metatheoretical operation that a companion paper has applied to the double-slit experiment: an ontological reframing that does not propose new physics but redescribes what the existing formalism is about. On the proposed reading, an entangled state is not two particles plus a connection across space, but a single idempotent configuration in the dual domain of Transformative Semalgebraic Ontology (OTS), whose only crossing into the real domain is a measurement event that produces correlated outcomes. The correlations are not transmitted between two real-domain entities; they are the joint signature of one non-spatial configuration whose transformation actualises two events that are spatially separated only in the real domain. Bell’s theorem retains its full validity; what is dissolved is the inference from theorem to action at a distance. The article does not derive the Tsirelson bound, which belongs to a separate technical treatment; its sole contribution is the ontological reframing of Bell nonlocality. The mystery of Bell nonlocality arises, on this reading, when the spatial separation of the outcomes is projected back onto the configuration that precedes them.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bell-Nonlocal Quantum Entanglement as Boundary-Level Compatibility#705816
- Quantum Nonlocality: How Does Nature Do It?#729667
- Wave Function Ontology#754737
- Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate#746663
- Intrinsicality and Entanglement#777301
Record · ID 228678
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive