PhilArchive
open access
Imprecise Credence are Super Dumb
Philosophers of probability have made a real mess of things, offering dumb takes on dozens of classical topics. Yet on one issue in particular, their takes stand apart in this race to the intellectual bottom. Imprecise credences are {\it super} dumb.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Logic of Fast and Slow Thinking#769491
- Why people ignore great ideas, and how they actually spread, explained in one page.#695344
- Comment on "Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell Paradoxes"#750056
- How Has Quantum Physics Affected the Free Will Debate?#768236
- Why is the gambler's fallacy a fallacy?#787580
Record · ID 228743
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive