Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
The Good, The Bad, and The ChatGPT: a Bibliometric Analysis of its Dominance in Natural Language Processing
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Writing with ChatGPT#730931
- BLM-Hum1800: A Human-Validated Benchmark for Linguistic Competence in English and French#486095
- BLM-Hum1800: A Human-Validated Benchmark for Linguistic Competence in English and French#477869
- ChatGPT, metacognitive processes and syntactic complexity : an overview of LLMs usage and its impact on writing in the EFL classroom#672488
- Harnessing ChatGPT for Medical Education: A Narrative Review.#223037
Record · ID 228800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive