Deconstruction as a Moral Fact: Durkheim versus Derrida on Structure, Authority, and Democracy

Both Durkheim and Derrida think through the ‘structurality of structure’, or the arbitrary and empty nature of a central, onto-theological/ metaphysical authority. In response, Derrida articulates a deconstructive ethics and politics that remains continuously open to the infinite alterity of the other and that subverts metaphysical thought. Durkheim, however, concludes that structure is an inherent feature of social life. He argues that all moral systems necessarily contain metaphysical dimensions that deconstruction actively works against, notably through the notion of the sacred. This article discusses Derrida’s deconstructive ethics and politics, assesses its claims from a Durkheimian perspective, and argues that deconstruction contains a notion of the sacred in the form of infinite alterity. Deconstruction thus contains a moral authority and is marked by an unacknowledged onto-theology. Derrida’s democracy to come thus creates a stable and structured group identity and constitutes a form of what Durkheim identifies as the cult of the individual.