PhilArchive
open access
What is mansplaining?
This paper develops an account of mansplaining as violation of a norm of cooperative conversation. Because this violation, we argue, occurs when one treats their interlocutor as less epistemically worthy than they are, mansplaining is theorised as a distinctive tool of epistemic oppression.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Conversational Character of Oppression#84539
- Complexity and the social world.#1039442
- The Limits of Metalinguistic Negotiation: The Role of Shared Meanings in Normative Debate#102504
- Sexual harassment as "wrongful communication"#80463
- A dilemma for conferralism#71871
Record · ID 232989
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive