PhilArchive
open access
Opinion Flow Concentration: The Phase-Transition Dynamics of Continuation Flows on Topic Paths in the Social Field
Drawing on sedimentation field dynamics, this paper redefines public opinion from an aggregation of views to a phase-transition structure of continuation flows on topic paths within the social field. The central claim is that when the opinion flow concentration intensity (OpinionFlow) of a topic path exceeds the critical threshold θ_opinion, a positive feedback mechanism is triggered and continuation flows accelerate their convergence to form a self-organizing opinion structure; θ_opinion ∝ φ_{F_S} / K_{F_S}, so in solidified social fields the concentration threshold is lower and public opinion more easily erupts. The paper derives the complete dynamic equation for concentration (incorporating the concentration seed Seed, saturation constraint, and threshold-activated suppression effect), identifies three forms of concentration (event-driven, accumulative, suppression-induced), and establishes three theorems: (1) Opinion Concentration Formation Tendency Theorem — under conditions of Familiarity asymmetry and non-zero Seed, the system systematically tends toward concentration formation; (2) Concentration Argument-Resistance Theorem — a single individual field’s logical argument cannot break an established concentration; an alternative topic requires Shock exceeding T_replace(T) to trigger genuine topic replacement; (3) Suppression Rebound Theorem — suppression below the replacement threshold triggers rejection and concentration returns in stronger form after suppression (the dynamical formalization of the Streisand Effect). The fundamental path to changing public opinion is not providing better arguments but changing the social field’s structural parameters or introducing a new topic event exceeding the replacement threshold.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can resources save rationality? ‘Anti-Bayesian’ updating in cognition and perception#750783
- Reference-Induced Perturbation: Normativity, Agency, and Rule-Following in Perceptual Control Theory#731801
- The Engineering of Nonsense: Load Minimization, Dynamic Equilibrium, and the Constant of Repose in Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland — Toward a Third Form of Nihilism via LMT 4.4 —#83867
- Indirect Influence: How Elite Attacks on Information Providers Affect Public Opinion Formation#323791
- Causal Influence Maximization with Steady-State Guarantees#1155140
Record · ID 237261
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive