Epistemic Chameleonism: A Structural and Conceptual Comparative Analysis of the Evolutio Unfolding Theory (2020) and the "Platonic Space" Framework (2025)

This paper presents a detailed structural and conceptual comparison between the Evolutio Unfolding Theory (EUT), published by Agustín Ostachuk in 2020, and the "Platonic Space" framework, introduced by Michael Levin in a 2025 preprint. While the latter is presented as a novel contribution, this analysis demonstrates a profound and systematic overlap with the core architecture of the former. By examining foundational principles – the ontology of form, the source of biological order, the nature of novelty, the role of teleology, the guidance of development, and the dynamics of evolution – we show that Levin's framework reproduces the explanatory structure of the EUT, with primary changes limited to terminology. The analysis goes beyond the identification of isolated similarities to document the wholesale appropriation of a complete theoretical architecture. A new section on terminological translation reveals how Levin's renaming of key concepts serves as a camouflage strategy. This paper serves as a definitive record of conceptual lineage and priority, arguing that the "Platonic Space" framework is not an independent discovery but a renamed restatement of the Evolutio Unfolding Theory.