NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Large language models' performances regarding common patient questions about broken endodontic instruments: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-5.2, Gemini 3 and DeepSeek V3.2 in accuracy, consistency and readability.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making#359604
- Preprint Open Procedural Completion Without Perceptual Input: A Pilot Observation of Input-Gating Failure in a Deployed Clinical Large Language Model#170125
- Artificial intelligence chatbots in endodontic education-Concepts and potential applications.#174724
- CallScreenBench: Benchmarking Small Language Models as Phone Secretaries#665893
- CallScreenBench: Benchmarking Small Language Models as Phone Secretaries#664393
Record · ID 239785
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive