An Agnostic Structural Law

We present a synthesis of the Open Tensoriality Programme (OTP), a research programme initiated that set the lines along a novel epistemic and ontological category that took on through Wittgenstein (vs. Chomsky's apparent dichotomies,) the structural conditions for meaning and the notion of "basin" and "externsive" structural allowance for agency. The programme proposes a single agnostic structural law operating across physical, biological, cognitive, and cosmological scales: at every scale and in every substrate, a generative loop runs through a gap, closes on a stable remainder, and deposits that remainder as the constraint geometry within which the next gap appears. This paper has three aims. First, it states the programme's initial assumptions and their philosophical provenance. Second, it discusses the ontological category by the Symbol~2.0/Symboliad (software-physicalism) - and presents a few classes of evidence from artificial intelligence research and biology that confirm the category's construction. Third, it states the agnostic structural law formally and traces its consequences at the cosmological scale, proposing a constraint-flow cosmology in which also a physics of physics emerges: standard physics as the plateau-stable positive extraction of a deeper generative process. This position would be able to offer an interesting view over actual cosmology that may hint at explaining the "dark sector" among others. We can hypothesize about the origin of primes (RH) or the cosmological constants: what if they are residuals, not as results that need be assessed further by more calculus and introduction of novel explanations? A key claim is thus that from this level, an inversion of perspective occurs ("cognitive closure"), and it all follows from the "monadology" proposed and by the fact that intelligence is "backed-in" as specified by the notion of "basin" in the framework. Thus "agentity," "sentientity," "intelligence," "learning" which are conventionally attributed to dedicated cognitive spaces - are general features of dynamical systems that possess the "enactity" characteristic: history-dependent constraint geometry. The whole apparatus require no additional "representational" nor "goal-directedness" nor "world models" nor "meta-cognitive" layers as normally the biology takes for granted, but emerge directly from the construction within a proper frame of reference that needs to be assumed too ("plateaus of generativity"). These fine lines are like trajectories that in the framework are what sustains the Open Tensoriality and the "traversal" and are designated by the Symbols 2.0 and Symboliad construction in the form of a generative mechanism that seems so far agnostic. They are the minimal set that would sustain the Cognitinon-Cosmology Equivalence Principle and a continuum across scales. So far this "monadology" seems to hold well in philosophy, cognition, neurosciences, "consciousness", language and physics by "at boundary". Also for physics of agency, biology, the nature of time or a minimal "third realm" origin along the "anthropocosmos", philosophy and mathematical-physics development history which pointed constantly to that construction but did not attempted to take a view from the top. Thus through the program that can be stated, but in that limit sense and at boundary in Wittgenstein sense (thus bridging also a wisdom tradition of what cannot be said (Tao Te Ching).)