'You're a human being and not a robot that goes out to work': A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community.

‘You’re a human being and not a robot that goes out to work’: A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community - PMC Skip to main content An official website of the United States government Here's how you know Here's how you know Search Log in Primary site navigation Search Log in Search PMC Full-Text Archive Search in PMC Journal List User Guide As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice Palliat Med . 2026 Mar 18;40(6):833–844. doi: 10.1177/02692163261426184 ‘You’re a human being and not a robot that goes out to work’ : A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community Katarzyna A Patynowska 1, 2, ✉ , Tracey McConnell 3, 4 , Anne Finucane 5, 6 , Emma Maun 4, 7 , Erin Raquel Fantoni 4 , Jonathan Clemo 4 , Epiphany Leone 4 , Natasha Wynne 4 , Felicity Hasson 2 Author information Article notes Copyright and License information 1 Marie Curie, Belfast, UK 2 Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Belfast, UK 3 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, UK 4 Marie Curie, London, UK 5 Clinical Psychology, Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, UK 6 Marie Curie, Edinburgh, UK 7 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, UK ✉ Katarzyna A. Patynowska, Marie Curie Hospice Belfast, 1A Kensington Road, Belfast BT5 6NF, UK. Email: kasia.patynowska@mariecurie.org.uk Collection date 2026 Jun. © The Author(s) 2026 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage ). PMC Copyright notice PMCID: PMC13221572  PMID: 41848223 Abstract Background: Healthcare assistants (paid nursing support workers without professional qualifications) provide care for terminally ill patients but remain understudied in palliative care research. Working alone in patients’ homes presents a distinct set of intersecting challenges: decision-making in distressing situations, professional isolation and limited access to training and support. Despite growing recognition of the importance of staff wellbeing for care quality and workforce retention, little is known about factors affecting wellbeing and intention to leave among this workforce. Aim: To explore factors affecting wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community. Design: Qualitative study combining free-text survey responses and semi-structured interviews, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Setting/participants: Healthcare assistants from a charitable hospice organisation in the United Kingdom. Results: One-hundred and eighty-three participants completed free-text survey questions; 14 participated in interviews. A number of societal, organisational and individual factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave were generated. Healthcare assistants experience high job satisfaction from meaningful work alongside systematic undervaluation. Many factors that influence wellbeing and intention to leave fall within organisational control, particularly support systems, workplace culture, recognition, and training opportunities. Conclusions: Organisations have clear opportunities to improve healthcare assistants’ wellbeing and retention through targeted interventions addressing support, recognition, and professional development needs. Keywords: palliative care, nursing assistants, health services research, personnel turnover, occupational stress What is already known about the topic? Staff wellbeing affects care quality and likelihood of leaving healthcare roles. Healthcare assistants face unique challenges providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community. What this paper adds? Factors affecting lone working healthcare assistants’ wellbeing and intention to leave operate at three distinct levels: societal, organisational, and individual. High job satisfaction from meaningful palliative and end-of-life care coexists with systemic undervaluation of the healthcare assistants’ role, raising concerns that intrinsic motivation may compensate for structural shortfalls. Support systems, recognition, and professional development opportunities represent key organisational levers for improving healthcare assistants’ wellbeing and reducing intention to leave. Implications for practice, theory or policy Future research should develop a theoretical understanding of what works, for whom, and in what circumstances to improve the wellbeing of lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community and reduce intention to leave. Investment in workplace culture and recognition systems is essential. Background The wellbeing of healthcare staff has become a prominent research focus and a pressing concern for healthcare organisations. 1 – 4 This attention stems in part from growing evidence linking staff wellbeing to the safety and quality of care provided 5 – 10 and the likelihood of workers leaving their roles. 11 , 12 In recent years, issues related to staff turnover have become more pronounced, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. 13 Despite extensive research on the wellbeing of healthcare professionals, there remains a significant gap in the literature concerning healthcare assistants. Yet, this workforce plays a vital role across many countries in delivery of direct care, such as providing personal care, monitoring changes that require escalation to other professionals, emotional support for terminally ill patients and their families. 14 – 17 Internationally, healthcare assistants are recognised as support healthcare workers and often operate without the oversight of a regulatory body, with variations in job titles (such as nurse aides, unregulated care providers, homecare workers), roles and responsibilities across settings and jurisdictions. 17 , 18 These variations lead to difficulties estimating number of care workers based on examples from Norway, Australia and Canada. 19 The US estimated there were 3,689 million home health and personal care aides making it the largest occupation in 2023 20 but only a proportion of them delivered palliative and end-of-life care in the community. A recent workforce report estimated that 12,200 nurses and healthcare assistants were employed in hospices during 2022–2023. 21 However, this report did not provide separate figures for nurses and healthcare assistants. 21 The factors shaping wellbeing among this substantial yet under-researched workforce remain unclear. Workplace wellbeing is influenced by what people think and feel about their working lives, such as the quality of their relationships, resilience, sense of autonomy, the realisation of their potential, and their overall satisfaction with work. 22 – 24 While previous studies have identified numerous factors that affect the wellbeing of healthcare workers, the focus has predominantly been on professional groups such as nurses and physicians. 9 , 12 , 25 , 26 Some general stressors include organisational change, insufficient organisational support and workload. 27 , 28 Hospice staff, however, face particular challenges involving emotional labour, given the frequent encounters with complex and sensitive issues relating to loss, death, and grief. 27 , 29 – 31 For healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community – providing care and support for people with palliative and end-of-life care needs – these challenges may be exacerbated by the nature of their work. Working alone in patients’ homes without other practitioners present, they are commonly referred to as ‘lone workers’. 32 , 33 As such they may be required to make decisions in highly distressing situations, 32 while often working at night. Healthcare assistants often have limited interactions with other professionals and team members, 34 , 35 which restricts their opportunities for experiential learning and peer support. 32 , 36 , 37 Despite these challenges, we previously demonstrated that healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community report higher wellbeing scores (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale mean = 52.2, standard deviation, SD = 8.6) 38 compared to those in other healthcare settings 3 , 39 , 40 and a general United Kingdom population, 41 alongside low intention to leave scores (Turnover Intention Scale mean = 14.9, SD = 5.3, scale range 6–30). 38 Moreover, we found that higher wellbeing scores were related to lower intentions to leave ( r (216) = −0.25, p < 0.001), with workplace support emerging as a predictor of both outcomes. 38 While providing end-of-life care is often seen as meaningful and professionally fulfilling, 10 , 42 the wider factors contributing to healthcare assistants’ wellbeing and intention to leave are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to examine these factors among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community, offering a deeper understanding of what shapes these outcomes. Understanding the factors that contribute to wellbeing and intention to leave is essential for organisations seeking to improve staff retention and address workforce challenges. Methods Design Qualitative study combining free-text responses from the cross-sectional survey, which provided breadth of data, with semi-structured interviews, which enabled in-depth exploration. Both datasets were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. 43 , 44 Such a design allowed for wide and in-depth exploration of factors affecting wellbeing and intention to leave among the study population. This study adopts a constructionist approach, recognising that healthcare assistants’ experiences and the meanings they attribute to their work are socially constructed through interactions within their organisational and care contexts. The study is reported following the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). 45 This paper is part of a wider study. Our previously published work reported quantitative findings integrating qualitative findings specifically linked to healthcare assistants’ wellbeing support in the workplace. 38 The current paper extends this to provide comprehensive qualitative exploration necessary to understand not just that wellbeing and intentions to leave vary, but why. Setting Participants were drawn from a not-for-profit organisation in the United Kingdom providing care and support to over 60,000 terminally ill patients each year. The organisation’s hospice at home service employs healthcare assistants to deliver both scheduled (when healthcare assistant stays with one patient, mainly overnight) and emergency care in patients’ homes (multiple visits during a day or night). Participants and sampling Eligible participants included healthcare assistants who spent any portion of their work hours providing palliative and end-of-life care working alone in patients’ homes. At the commencement of recruitment (01/05/23) 969 lone working healthcare assistants worked across the UK within hospice at home services, mainly during the night. We used convenience sampling to recruit survey participants. All who expressed interest in an interview ( n = 14) were interviewed to maximise participation from this under-researched workforce. Recruitment An invitation was distributed to all eligible healthcare assistants via email by the service managers. Two reminders were sent to enhance response rates, with survey participants entered into a prize draw and interviewees receiving a gift voucher. Completion of the anonymous survey was taken as an indication of consent to participate. The first question of the questionnaire acted as eligibility screening for lone workers. At the conclusion of the survey, participants could express their interest in an interview by completing a form via a separate link. Willing participants were contacted by KP via telephone or email to obtain consent and arrange interviews. Dataset generation The survey was conducted using Microsoft Forms from 12/04/23 to 7/06/23 and included free-text questions: What factors come to mind when you think of reasons not to stay in your current role? What factors come to mind when you think of reasons to stay in your current role? And finally, what do you think [the organisation] could do to support Health Care Assistants and help them stay in their role? That is, increase retention? Full survey tool and data can be found in our previously published paper. 38 All participants who filled an expression of interest form ( n = 14), participated in the interviews. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted by KP between 19/07/23 and 31/08/23 using a topic guide (see Supplemental Material ). Participants answered demographic and work characteristics questions at both stages. Dataset generation tools were developed by the research team with stakeholder advisory group input. The survey required no piloting; the first interview served as a pilot with no subsequent modifications needed. Data analysis The free-text responses from the survey were organised using Microsoft Excel. Interview recordings were transcribed by a professional transcriber. All data have been anonymised. Both datasets were integrated throughout the analysis. We gave pseudonyms for interview participants using Anglo female and gender-neutral names to protect participants’ identities and reduce any cultural assumptions. Both datasets were then printed to facilitate pen-and-paper analysis. They were thoroughly read several times to ensure a deep understanding, with reflexive notes recorded throughout to track our assumptions and evolving interpretations. 46 KP, who is a palliative care nurse within the same organisation, with experience of training, education and support of hospice at home staff, completed the analysis using reflexive thematic approach. 43 , 44 Reflexive thematic analysis was selected because it aligns with our constructionist approach. This approach focussed on how participants constructed meaning through social interactions rather than seeking objective truths. Coding was primarily inductive, working at both semantic and latent levels to examine participants’ explicit accounts and underlying meanings within their organisational contexts. All data were independently coded by both KP and FH, who then met to compare and discuss their analyses until consensus was reached on codes and themes. All findings were subsequently discussed with the wider research team and stakeholder advisory group, and refined based on their feedback and insights (please see authorship section for more details). Ethical considerations Ethical approval was received from Ulster University Nursing and Health Sciences Ethics Filter Committee (FCNUR-23-010; 08/02/23) and the Senior Research Governance Manager at the recruiting organisation (31/03/23). The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles for research involving human participants. No ethical issues arose during the conduct of the study. Results Overview Response rate for the survey was 22.5%. One hundred and eighty-three out of 218 survey participants completed optional free-text questions. This was followed by 14 semi-structured interviews ranging from 24 to 67 min (mean of 41 min). Participant characteristics are described in Table 1 . Table 1. Sample characteristics. Variable Category Survey participants, n = 218 Interview participants, n = 14 Frequency a % of valid responses/mean (SD) Frequency % of valid responses/mean (SD) Gender b Female 202 92.7 14 100 Male 9 4.1 - Age 200 Mean 51.3 (SD 11.0) 14 Mean 51.2 (SD 13.9) Ethnicity c White 181 85.0 14 100 Ethnic minorities 32 15.0 - - Proportion spent lone working All/almost all 165 75.7 14 100 Most 23 10.6 - - About half 7 3.2 - - Some 16 7.3 - - Almost none 7 3.2 - - Contract Contracted hours 169 77.9 10 71 Bank 48 22.1 4 29 Type of hours Full time 83 39.3 2 14 Part time 128 60.7 12 86 Place of work England 144 68.6 8 57 Northern Ireland 18 8.6 2 14 Scotland 39 18.6 4 29 Wales 9 4.3 - - Total years of experience as healthcare assistant d 199 Mean 18.7 (SD 11.7) 14 Mean 14.4 (SD 12.0) Open in a new tab SD: standard deviation. a Missing data: gender (seven participants, 3.2%), age (18, 8.2%), ethnicity (5, 2.3%), type of hours (7, 3.2%), place of work (8, 3.7%), years of experience as healthcare assistants in current employing organisation and total (19, 8.7%), overall level of missingness 10.6%. b Includes survey responses: prefer not to say (4), prefer to self-describe (2) and missing (1). c Ethnic minorities included healthcare assistants self-reporting as Asian (3), Black (23) and other/mixed categories (6). d Missing includes survey participants whose years of experience exceeded their age or required commencing work before age 16. Factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave Our analysis generated several factors impacting healthcare assistants’ wellbeing and intention to leave and grouped these into three levels: societal, organisational and individual. Societal-level factors influencing wellbeing and intention to leave This theme encapsulates participants’ thoughts and feelings about how society and others perceive their role and contribution. These perceptions span a wide spectrum. On one end, healthcare assistants report that they feel invisible and undervalued within wider society, while also recognising that people affected by terminal illness highly value their contribution. Public perceptions of the healthcare assistant’s role are marked by a lack of understanding regarding the complexity and responsibilities involved, further reflected by low pay across the care sector. Participants shared being described as ‘sitters’, which they find demeaning and reductive of their actual contributions. I think it would be beneficial to have more education publicly about the role of the healthcare assistant, and to push for more knowledge round that, so that there is more respect within the community. (Harper, interview participant) Mixed experiences related to value and recognition of their role were reported when working with other healthcare professionals, such as district nurses. Some healthcare assistants reported that a lack of acknowledgement in contributing to information or decisions around patient care impacts their sense of professional worth. Sometimes what you tell them [other healthcare professionals] isn’t taken any notice of, and you just feel as though you don’t know anything and you’re telling them something. I don’t think we get valued. (Anne, interview participant) Positive verbal feedback from patients and their families greatly enhances job satisfaction and confidence, highlighting the meaningfulness of their work. Such feedback brings a sense of value and validates healthcare assistants’ efforts to provide the best possible care. I like it whenever people say, we really appreciate what you did for our mum or our dad. Or we really appreciate the chance that we had to chat through things with you and maybe learn a few new things ourselves about how to look after them. We are glad that you were here last night to deal with that situation because it was quite tough. It makes me want to keep doing the job! (Lisa, interview participant) Organisational-level factors that influence wellbeing and intention to leave This theme contains factors relating to work organisation, management practices, and workplace support that fall within the remit of the employing organisation to influence. Central to this theme is the tension between autonomy and isolation inherent to lone working and healthcare assistants’ need for meaningful connection, support and recognition within their workplace. Lone working poses challenges, including unpredictability and the responsibility of managing situations independently as the sole practitioner present in the home. While this is recognised as an inherent aspect of the role, participants emphasised the importance of knowing whom to contact for assistance and having access to up-to-date patient information prior to their shifts to reduce uncertainty. You get concerned that you’re going to have a situation that you’re not necessarily sure how to deal with. Because the patients change quickly. You don’t necessarily know what’s going to happen. . . obviously you are in someone’s house and you are by yourself. . . because you are there on your own, you are having to make those decisions. (Sam, interview participant) Furthermore, healthcare assistants who mainly work at night are required to undertake unpaid work-related tasks outside of shift hours, such as calling their line manager and contacting IT support. Frequent organisational and system changes require them to spend time troubleshooting and learning new systems, often without adequate support or training, leading to frustration, which may influence staff turnover. That would be one of the things why I think people probably leave, because there is so much pressure to do so much outside of work (Amber, interview participant) Workplace culture should involve recognising employees as individuals with unique social and emotional needs and providing mechanisms to address these within the workplace. Participants emphasised the importance of interactions with peers to fulfil these needs, describing colleagues as uniquely placed to provide emotional support because of shared experiences. I much prefer to talk to my colleagues. Because like I said, they’ve been in those situations so they kind of know what you’re going through. (. . .) With your colleagues, you can have a cup of coffee, you can laugh, you can joke, you can cry. (Morgan, interview participant) A safe and trusting relationship with the line manager is crucial for healthcare assistants, as they serve as the primary link between lone workers and the organisation. Line managers’ multifaceted role includes addressing wellbeing, providing performance feedback, facilitating debriefs, and fostering team cohesion and a supportive workplace culture. They’ve always been really good. They’ll help change your shifts. They’ll be a listening ear if you’ve got an emotional problem. They can guide you to the help that is out there. (Sonia, interview participant) Inadequate pay emerged as a significant factor affecting both wellbeing and intention to leave. Participants expressed concerns that their remuneration does not adequately reflect the complexity of their responsibilities, their experience or training. While stability of the regular income is appreciated, it is often viewed as insufficient given the demanding nature of their role, the emotional labour involved, and current market conditions. Pay - not a true reflection of the care we provide to not only patients but families as well and due to the living crisis it does have its toll and effect on you both mentally and physically. we really are not paid enough for what we do and the effect it has on our emotional wellbeing. (Survey participant 124) Training and career progression opportunities are important for personal development and confidence. Participants shared a need for more frequent and accessible learning opportunities and additional responsibilities to better utilise their skills. Wanting to improve myself been offered more responsibility and acknowledge for my experience I bring from previous jobs and been rewarded for that. as well as opportunity to do further training for self-improvement and development to keep the fire burning inside for the passion I have for helping others and families and to be able feel more involved and not just a HCA [healthcare assistant] and the feeling of been restricted in my role. (Survey participant 106) However, participants reported a gap for individuals who want to progress within their current role rather than transition into management, nursing or non-clinical positions. I personally don’t believe, in my role, I could go any higher. I don’t think there’s any progression higher, unless I left there and went into university and started doing nursing or something. (. . .) Unless I came out of the healthcare assistant into something else. (Emilia, interview participant) Individual-level factors associated with wellbeing and intention to leave The final theme focuses on individual factors. While universally healthcare assistants gain significant job satisfaction from the meaningful nature of their work, challenges such as the emotional demands of caregiving and lone working affect individuals differently based on their personal circumstances, qualities, skills and experiences. The vast majority of healthcare assistants agreed in their responses that they stay in their role due to profound job satisfaction and the sense of meaningfulness they feel when able to help people impacted by terminal illness. This has been the strongest finding from the free-text data. My passion is end of life care and I want to provide the best care I can with professionalism and dignity. Knowing that I can make a difference to the patient and to the families is what keeps me going. When families tell me that I made a difference then that’s my reward (Survey participant 16) Such sentiment was shared by interviewees who described a sense of deep internal motivation to help others and a reward when they can bring others some relief during difficult times. I love my job. Absolutely love my job. I love supporting families, helping them. I’ve been in this situation. I know what it’s like to be looking after somebody. (. . .) I’m not saying it’s not sometimes sad. And some patients are much harder than others, depending on the family dynamics. But certainly, I think it’s a real rewarding job. And I think you come away feeling you’ve really achieved something. (Chris, interview participant) However, this commitment to care suggests that organisations may be relying on healthcare assistants’ dedication to compensate for systemic shortfalls. We all put in so many extra hours without pay and you will never hear anyone complain about that. We all put our patients and their families first. (Survey participant 178) The overall sense of meaning and job satisfaction appears to buffer healthcare assistants from negative emotional impact of caring for people affected by terminal illness. It can be very upsetting, but that comes as part of the job. Because I always say, if you can’t cry, it’s not for you. Because we all have emotions and everything. (. . .) I do my crying in the car. That’s where I have my emotions, when I leave. (. . .) And then I think, well . . . I’ve been there for them and they’ve been looked after well. And I know that most of them have had a good death. (Julie, interview participant) Personal qualities and skills may affect how healthcare assistants experience the demands of the role. Lone workers who thrive in hospice at home settings typically exhibit confidence, independence, adaptability, and a positive attitude towards challenges. However, lone working is not suitable for everyone; while some adapt well to the responsibility and autonomy that comes from working independently, others may find the isolation and pressure of making decisions with limited support detrimental to their wellbeing. Those who had more experience as lone workers appeared to be coping better with such demands. You need to be a certain kind of someone that can walk into a house, not knowing anybody, not knowing the layout. . . you really have to get in, and you have to be able to adapt very easily and very quickly, to different situations. (Val, interview participant) Some participants reported that night working significantly impacts physical health , leading to disturbed sleep patterns and ongoing fatigue and as a result, they may need to reduce their hours or find alternative employment. Constant tiredness as only night shifts are available, that is the nature of the job. I am aware that nightshifts are not sustainable nor healthy for the rest of my working life and so eventually I will need to reduce my shifts and find work elsewhere. (Survey participant 83) Discussion This study reveals key insights into the experiences of lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community. Healthcare assistants experience a fundamental paradox - high job satisfaction coexists with the perception that their role is undervalued both financially and in terms of their skills and contributions to society. Secondly, many of the factors negatively impacting their wellbeing and retention intentions fall within organisational control, providing opportunities for targeted interventions. The paradox of meaningful work and undervaluation Job satisfaction and meaningful work emerged as the main reasona for healthcare assistants to remain in their roles, despite multiple factors negatively impacting their wellbeing. This aligns with other research on hospice workers 42 , 47 , 48 and homecare workers, 10 , 49 , 50 where supporting people at end-of-life contributes to psychological wellbeing. Evidence suggests job satisfaction among homecare workers may be linked with close relationships developed with patients and family caregivers, 10 , 51 and the sense of being able to ‘make a difference’. 42 This meaningful work exists alongside systemic undervaluation reflected in low societal status 10 , 52 – 54 and exclusion from patient care decisions despite providing most direct care. 55 – 57 Evidence shows that over time healthcare assistants have increasingly taken on roles traditionally performed by nurses, yet this shift has not been matched by appropriate recognition or support. 58 , 59 While the sense of doing meaningful work acts as a strong predictor of retention, 60 it may mask underlying sustainability issues related to systemic undervaluation that could pose long-term retention risks. This situation raises important questions about the sustainability of relying on intrinsic motivation to compensate for systemic undervaluation. While meaningful work provides psychological protection, it may also enable organisations to maintain suboptimal working conditions, assuming that job satisfaction will overcome structural challenges. This risks exploiting healthcare assistants’ commitment to caring. Organisational factors as opportunities to make positive impacts Lone working practices appear to have negative impacts on wellbeing, highlighting the need for organisations to carefully structure and support these arrangements. Previous research has shown the challenges of delivering end-of-life care at home as a lone worker, with the unpredictability and rapidly changing nature of homecare situations further compounding these difficulties. 32 , 37 , 61 Healthcare assistants in our study emphasised the importance of establishing trusting relationships with line managers, who serve as their primary organisational connection, to cope with these challenges, similarly to general homecare workers. 62 Literature highlights that strong organisational support and supportive culture within a workplace, such as supervisor support and peer support, could improve hospice staff wellbeing, despite this, such support is often inadequately available. 10 , 34 , 36 , 42 , 52 , 63 This is surprising given the emotional labour involved in their role. 32 , 52 , 64 Healthcare assistants often develop close relationships with the people they support through sharing the profound experience of accompanying someone through dying, and may consequently experience grief. 62 , 65 , 66 Supportive workplace culture experienced by some participants in our study may help to explain high levels of wellbeing described in our previous paper. 38 For others who lack such support, interventions are needed to manage these emotional challenges. While societal-level recognition is difficult to influence, organisations can directly impact how healthcare assistants feel valued. This could be done by ensuring pay levels reflect their responsibilities, demonstrating organisational recognition of their role’s complexity and market conditions. 59 , 67 , 68 Secondly, provision of appropriate training and career progression opportunities signals investment in their professional development. A review by Papworth et al. 42 indicated a strong relationship between appropriate training and wellbeing in hospice staff, yet training provision remains insufficient and patchy. 69 Previous research demonstrated that a perceived lack of career advancement opportunities significantly increases turnover intention among homecare workers. 60 It is worth noting that healthcare assistants want to be valued for doing their current job well rather than being pressured towards progression into nursing or management roles, 56 and career progression opportunities should reflect this. Unlike other home healthcare settings, participants did not report traditional occupational hazards as primary concerns, possibly reflecting the protective effects of meaningful work or existing safety systems. 70 – 73 Considerations for policy and practice Organisations should prioritise investment in workplace culture fostering team interaction and trusting line manager relationships. Recognition systems must reflect role complexity through appropriate pay and career progression opportunities that value current role performance rather than suggesting transition to nursing or management. Finally, hospice organisations can influence perceptions of the role through community education and by ensuring healthcare assistants are visible in public-facing activities, moving beyond their invisible status in healthcare hierarchies. To support this, the research team commissioned artwork by a practising healthcare assistant ( Figure 1 ), which captures the emotional demands, clinical judgement, and multifaceted interactions that define their work – yet remain invisible to healthcare systems and society. Figure 1. Open in a new tab Painting by Dáire Lawlor, Northern Ireland-based artist and healthcare assistant, depicting the multifaceted role of healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community. This artwork was commissioned by the project lead KP and funded by study grant MCSGS-22-801. Implications for research Future research should test organisational interventions, particularly peer support programmes and mentorship schemes. Longitudinal studies tracking career trajectories and economic evaluations of wellbeing investments are needed to explore sustainability of lone working arrangements and implications for investing in staff wellbeing. Strengths and limitations of the study This study addresses a significant gap in palliative care research by focussing on healthcare assistants. The strengths include an approach combining qualitative survey responses with in-depth interviews and stakeholder involvement enhancing practical relevance. Limitations include convenience sampling from a single charitable organisation, where participants worked mostly providing scheduled overnight care, predominantly female and white sample, cross-sectional design, and inability to establish causal relationships between wellbeing and intention to leave. We acknowledge that KP’s position as a nurse researcher within the employing organisation shaped the research process and interpretation. This insider position provided contextual understanding but required ongoing reflexivity about assumptions and the risk of over-identifying with organisational perspectives. The involvement of FH as an external researcher provided critical distance, and collaboration between insider and outsider perspectives strengthened analytical rigour. Conclusion This study reveals that lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community experience high job satisfaction from meaningful work alongside systemic undervaluation. Healthcare assistants perform complex, autonomous work in emotionally demanding environments, yet this complexity remains largely invisible. For healthcare systems increasingly reliant on healthcare assistants for home-based care delivery, addressing this paradox is essential for sustainable service provision. The clear identification of organisational-level intervention opportunities provides a foundation for targeted improvements, while recognising healthcare assistants’ complex work challenges assumptions about skill requirements and support systems in community healthcare. Supplemental Material sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163261426184 – Supplemental material for ‘You’re a human being and not a robot that goes out to work’: A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163261426184.docx (32.4KB, docx) Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163261426184 for ‘You’re a human being and not a robot that goes out to work’: A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community by Katarzyna A. Patynowska, Tracey McConnell, Anne Finucane, Emma Maun, Erin Raquel Fantoni, Jonathan Clemo, Epiphany Leone, Natasha Wynne and Felicity Hasson in Palliative Medicine Acknowledgments We extend our sincere appreciation to advisory group contributors Colette McAtamney, Peter Donnelly, and Gillian Walpole for their valuable input regarding study methodology, data interpretation, and knowledge translation. Special recognition goes to the healthcare assistants who participated in the questionnaire and interviews, as well as the department supervisors who facilitated recruitment by circulating participation invitations. Footnotes ORCID iDs: Katarzyna A. Patynowska https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8821-4537 Emma Maun https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-7817 Felicity Hasson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-9732 Author contributions: A nurse researcher with palliative care expertise (KP) was supported by researchers with qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods expertise in palliative care and social sciences (FH, TM, AF, RF, EM). Stakeholder group included senior manager of hospice at home service (JC), member of the public (PD), healthcare assistant (GW), registered nurse (CM), policy manager (NW) and wellbeing lead (EL). KP, FH, TM, AF, RF designed the study with input from JC, PD, GW, CM, NW and EL. Qualitative data analysis was completed by KP and FH with input from all members of the research team and stakeholder group. All authors contributed to this manuscript. Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Marie Curie Small Research Grant (MCSGS-22-8001). KP’s time on this study was funded by Marie Curie. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Data availability statement: Data relating to this research project can be obtained by contacting the lead author at kasia.patynowska@mariecurie.org.uk . Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online. References 1. Ingebretsen LP, Sagbakken M. Hospice nurses’ emotional challenges in their encounters with the dying. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 2016; 11(1): 31170. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 2. May S, Gabb F, Ignatyev Y, et al. Mental and physical well-being and burden in palliative care nursing: a cross-setting mixed-methods study. IJERPH 2022; 19(10): 6240. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 3. Ravalier JM, McVicar A, Boichat C. Work stress in NHS employees: a mixed-methods study. IJERPH 2020; 17(18): 6464. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 4. Finucane AM, Hulbert-Williams NJ, Swash B, et al. Feasibility of RESTORE: an online acceptance and commitment therapy intervention to improve palliative care staff wellbeing. Palliat Med 2023; 37(2): 244–256. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 5. Maben J, Peccei R, Adams M, et al. Exploring the relationship between patients’ experiences of care and the influence of staff motivation, affect and wellbeing. Phase II case studies: Annexe to final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme; 2012. [ Google Scholar ] 6. Blake H, Zhou D, Batt ME. Five-year workplace wellness intervention in the NHS. Perspect Public Health 2013; 133(5): 262–271. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 7. Bamforth K, Rae P, Maben J, et al. Perceptions of healthcare professionals’ psychological wellbeing at work and the link to patients’ experiences of care: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud Adv 2023; 5: 100148. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 8. Shanafelt T, Goh J, Sinsky C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177(12): 1826–1832. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 9. Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, et al. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016; 11(7): e0159015. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 10. Franzosa E, Tsui EK, Baron S. “Who’s caring for us?”: Understanding and addressing the effects of emotional labor on home health aides’ well-being. Gerontologist 2019; 59(6): 1055–1064. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 11. Scanlan JN, Meredith P, Poulsen AA. Enhancing retention of occupational therapists working in mental health: relationships between wellbeing at work and turnover intention. Aust Occup Ther J 2013; 60(6): 395–403. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 12. Kinman GT. The mental health and wellbeing of nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom. The Society of Occupational Medicine, 2020. [ Google Scholar ] 13. Poon YR, Lin YP, Griffiths P, et al. A global overview of healthcare workers’ turnover intention amid COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with future directions. Hum Resour Health 2022; 20(1): 70. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 14. Herber OR, Johnston BM. The role of healthcare support workers in providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community: a systematic literature review: role of healthcare support workers. Health Soc Care Community 2013; 21(3): 225–235. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 15. Fee A, Muldrew D, Slater P, et al. The roles, responsibilities and practices of healthcare assistants in out-of-hours community palliative care: a systematic scoping review. Palliat Med 2020; 34(8): 976–988. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 16. Saari M, Xiao S, Rowe A, et al. The role of unregulated care providers in home care: a scoping review. J Nurs Manag 2018; 26(7): 782–794. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 17. Afzal A, Stolee P, Heckman GA, et al. The role of unregulated care providers in Canada—a scoping review. Int J Older People Nurs 2018; 13(3): e12190. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 18. Jackson J, Gadimova F, Epko S. A nurse by any other name? An international comparison of nomenclature and regulation of healthcare assistants. Int J Nurs Stud Adv 2024; 6: 100200. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 19. Daly T, Charlesworth S, Jacobsen FF, et al. Counting care workers: when the ‘muddle’ is the message. In: Daly T, Braedley S. (eds) Ageing equitably with care: Power, Policy, Practice. Bristol University Press, Policy Press, 2025, pp.68–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.25941163.11 [ Google Scholar ] 20. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Divisions of Occupation Employment and Wage Statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Chart of the largest occupations in each area, May 2023. https://www.Bls.gov/oes/current/area_emp_chart/area_emp_chart.html (2025, assessed 23 February 2025). 21. Hospice UK. Key facts about hospice care (Internet). https://www.hospiceuk.org/about-us/key-facts-about-hospice-care (2024, assessed 19 December 2024) 22. Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Millstein RA, von Hippel C, et al. Psychological well-being as part of the public health debate? Insight into dimensions, interventions, and policy. BMC Public Health 2019; 19(1): 1712. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 23. Diener E. Assessing well-being: the collected works of Ed Diener, vol 39. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009. [ Google Scholar ] 24. Diener E, Seligman ME. Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2004; 5(1): 1–31. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 25. Diehl E, Rieger S, Letzel S, et al. Health and intention to leave the profession of nursing - which individual, social and organisational resources buffer the impact of quantitative demands? A cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19(1): 83. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 26. McVicar A. Scoping the common antecedents of job stress and job satisfaction for nurses (2000-2013) using the job demands-resources model of stress. J Nurs Manag 2016; 24(2): E112–E136. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 27. Powell MJ, Froggatt K, Giga S. Resilience in inpatient palliative care nursing: a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020; 10(1): 79–90. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 28. Health and Safety Executive. Lone working: protect those working alone (Internet). 2025. https://www.hse.gov.uk/lone-working/employer/index.htm 29. Hynes J, Maffoni M, Argentero P, et al. Palliative medicine physicians: doomed to burn? BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 9(1): 45–46. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 30. Samson T, Shvartzman P. Association between level of exposure to death and dying and professional quality of life among palliative care workers. Palliat Support Care 2018; 16(4): 442–451. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 31. Lovatt M, Nanton V, Roberts J, et al. The provision of emotional labour by health care assistants caring for dying cancer patients in the community: a qualitative study into the experiences of health care assistants and bereaved family carers. Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52(1): 271–279. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 32. Patynowska KA, McConnell T, McAtamney C, et al. ‘That just doesn’t feel right at times’ – lone working practices, support and educational needs of newly employed healthcare assistants providing 24/7 palliative care in the community: a qualitative interview study. Palliat Med 2023; 37(8): 1183–1192. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 33. Brennan W. Safer lone working: assessing the risk to health professionals. Br J Nurs 2010; 19(22): 1428–1430. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 34. Yeh I, Samsi K, Vandrevala T, et al. Constituents of effective support for homecare workers providing care to people with dementia at end of life. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34(2): 352–359. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 35. Olson R, Thompson SV, Elliot DL, et al. Safety and health support for home care workers: the COMPASS randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health 2016; 106(10): 1823–1832. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 36. Leverton M, Burton A, Beresford-Dent J, et al. ‘You can’t just put somebody in a situation with no armour’. An ethnographic exploration of the training and support needs of homecare workers caring for people living with dementia. Dementia 2021; 20(8): 2982–3005. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 37. Mabry L, Parker KN, Thompson SV, et al. Protecting workers in the home care industry: workers’ experienced job demands, resource gaps, and benefits following a socially supportive intervention. Home Health Care Serv Q 2018; 37(3): 259–276. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 38. Patynowska KA, Maun E, Fantoni ER, et al. Workplace support, wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community: A mixed methods study. Palliat Med 2025; 40(2): 194–205. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 39. Oates J, Jones J, Drey N. Subjective well-being of mental health nurses in the United Kingdom: results of an online survey. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2017; 26(4): 391–401. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 40. De Kock JH, Ann Latham H, Cowden RG, et al. The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study. BJPsych open 2022; 8(1): e23. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 41. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5(1): 63. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 42. Papworth A, Ziegler L, Beresford B, et al. Psychological well-being of hospice staff: systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13: e597–e611. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 43. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019; 11(4): 589–597. [ Google Scholar ] 44. Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol 2021; 18(3): 328–352. [ Google Scholar ] 45. Braun V, Clarke V. Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach. Qual Res Psychol 2025; 22: 399–438. [ Google Scholar ] 46. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77–101. [ Google Scholar ] 47. Ablett JR, Jones RSP. Resilience and well-being in palliative care staff: a qualitative study of hospice nurses’ experience of work. Psychooncology 2007; 16(8): 733–740. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 48. Lehto RH, Heeter C, Forman J, et al. Hospice employees’ perceptions of their work environment: a focus group perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(17): 6147. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 49. Devlin M, McIlfatrick S. Providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community: the role of the home-care worker. Int J Palliat Nurs 2010; 16(4): 195–203. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 50. Gershater MA, Brenner J, Nordberg M, et al. Nurse assistants’ perception of caring for older persons who are dying in their own home : an interview study. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23(1): 70. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 51. McPherson CJ, Etele J, Ta VC, et al. Unregulated care providers’ engagement in palliative care to older clients and their families in the home setting: a mixed methods study. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18(1): 52. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 52. Forward C, Bayley Z, Walker L, et al. Homecare workers needs and experiences in end of life care: rapid review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 14: e2330–e2340. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 53. Kupa PM, Geyer LS. A qualitative evaluation of a stress management programme for HIV and AIDS home-based care workers in Tshwane, South Africa. SAHARA J 2020; 17(1): 1–15. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 54. Poon A, Hussain V, Loughman J, et al. Computer-mediated peer support needs of home care workers: emotional labor & the politics of professionalism. PACMHCI 2021; 5(2): 1–32.36644216 [ Google Scholar ] 55. Jansen BW, Brazil K, Passmore P, et al. Exploring healthcare assistants’ role and experience in pain assessment and management for people with advanced dementia towards the end of life: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16(1): 6. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 56. Ferdinands A, Ormandy M, Hodge L, et al. Rural health care aide training experiences in a Canadian tuition assistance program: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2025; 24(1): 914. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 57. Franzosa E, Tsui EK, Baron S. Home health aides’ perceptions of quality care: goals, challenges, and implications for a rapidly changing industry. New Solut 2018; 27(4): 629–647. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 58. Kroezen M, Schäfer W, Sermeus W, et al. Healthcare assistants in EU member states: an overview. Health Policy 2018; 122(10): 1109–1117. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 59. Bach S, Kessler I, Heron P. Nursing a grievance? The role of healthcare assistants in a modernized national health service. Gend Work Organ 2012; 19(2): 205–224. [ Google Scholar ] 60. Brannon D, Barry T, Kemper P, et al. Job perceptions and intent to leave among direct care workers: evidence from the better jobs better care demonstrations. Gerontologist 2007; 47(6): 820–829. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 61. Sabar R, Halevi Hochwald I, Weiss M, et al. The professional guest: conceptualizing home visits in palliative care settings. PalliatCare 2024; 18: 26323524241293821. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 62. Tsui EK, Franzosa E, Cribbs KA, et al. Home care workers’ experiences of client death and disenfranchised grief. Qual Health Res 2019; 29(3): 382–392. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 63. Findlay GM, Robertson N. How do home care workers experience a client’s death, professionally and personally? A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Omega. Epub ahead of print 28 November 2024; 1–26. DOI: 10.1177/00302228241302. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 64. Beck I, Pålsson C, Tops AB. Upholding an ideal image of palliative work in the face of obstacles. Int J Palliat Nurs 2018; 24(12): 611–617. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 65. Boerner K, Gleason H, Jopp DS. Burnout after patient death: challenges for direct care workers. J Pain Symptom Manag 2017; 54(3): 317–325. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 66. Gee E, Yates J. Lessons on life and death: a qualitative exploration of home carers’ experiences following the death of a patient. Home Healthcare Now 2021; 39(5): 247–252. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 67. Vail L, Bosley S, Petrova M, et al. Healthcare assistants in general practice: a qualitative study of their experiences. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2011; 12(1): 29–41. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 68. Silver S, Boiano J, Li J. Patient care aides: differences in healthcare coverage, health-related behaviors, and health outcomes in a low-wage workforce by healthcare setting. Am J Ind Med 2020; 63(1): 60–73. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 69. Campbell S, Del Rio Drake A, Espinoza R, et al. Caring for the future: the power and potential of America’s direct care workforce. PHI, 2021. [ Google Scholar ] 70. Dondi AC, Bellacov R, Fray M, et al. Assessment of the occupational exposures within homes for home healthcare workers in the United Kingdom. Hum Factors Healthc 2024; 6: 100080. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 71. Hignett S, Edmunds Otter M, Keen C. Safety risks associated with physical interactions between patients and caregivers during treatment and care delivery in home care settings: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 59: 1–14. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 72. Wong M, Saari M, Patterson E, et al. Occupational hazards for home care nurses across the rural-to-urban gradient in Ontario, Canada. Health Soc Care Community 2017; 25(3): 1276–1286. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 73. Jong TD, Bos E, Pawlowska-Cyprysiak K, et al. Current and emerging occupational safety and health (OSH) issues in the healthcare sector, including home and community care. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2014. [ Google Scholar ] Associated Data This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article. Supplementary Materials sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163261426184 – Supplemental material for ‘You’re a human being and not a robot that goes out to work’: A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163261426184.docx (32.4KB, docx) Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163261426184 for ‘You’re a human being and not a robot that goes out to work’: A qualitative study exploring factors impacting on wellbeing and intention to leave among lone working healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care in the community by Katarzyna A. Patynowska, Tracey McConnell, Anne Finucane, Emma Maun, Erin Raquel Fantoni, Jonathan Clemo, Epiphany Leone, Natasha Wynne and Felicity Hasson in Palliative Medicine Articles from Palliative Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications ACTIONS View on publisher site PDF (1.4 MB) Cite Collections Permalink RESOURCES Similar articles Cited by other articles Links to NCBI Databases Follow NCBI NCBI on X (formerly known as Twitter) NCBI on Facebook NCBI on LinkedIn NCBI on GitHub NCBI RSS feed Connect with NLM NLM on X (formerly known as Twitter) NLM on Facebook NLM on YouTube National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers NLM NIH HHS USA.gov Back to Top

Related documents

• Physical Fatigue, Compassion Fatigue, and Quiet Quitting in Physiotherapists#870844
• Evaluating the Impact AI Avatar-led Mental Health Interventions for Keeping Employees in Work#982630
• Quiet quitting among Gen Z and millennial employees: contributing factors and organisational mitigation strategies.#438899
• Qualitative Study of Well-being at Work among People with Intellectual Disabilities in Sheltered Employment: Perspectives of Workers and their Supervisors#342809
• Physical Environment Features and Healthcare Interruptions: A Scoping Review Across Clinical Settings.#785491