Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review.

Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review - PMC Skip to main content An official website of the United States government Here's how you know Here's how you know Search Log in Primary site navigation Search Log in Search PMC Full-Text Archive Search in PMC Journal List User Guide As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice J Alzheimers Dis . 2026 Apr 23;111(4):1413–1438. doi: 10.1177/13872877261442966 Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review Sunny Tan 1, ✉ , Marine Markaryan 2 , Óscar Ribeiro 1 , Rita Maldonado Branco 3 , Liliana Sousa 1 Author information Article notes Copyright and License information 1 Department of Education and Psychology, RISE-Health, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal 2 Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands 3 Department of Communication and Art, Research Institute for Design Media and Culture (ID+), Health+Design Lab (HEAD), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal ✉ Sunny Tan, University of Aveiro, Department of Education and Psychology, Aveiro, Campus Universitario de Santiago Aveiro, PT 3810-193, Portugal. Email: sunnyt@ua.pt Roles Sunny Tan : Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft Marine Markaryan : Data curation, Methodology Óscar Ribeiro : Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing Rita Maldonado Branco : Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing Liliana Sousa : Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing Received 2025 Sep 18; Accepted 2026 Mar 11; Collection date 2026 Jun. © The Author(s) 2026 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage ). PMC Copyright notice PMCID: PMC13234317  PMID: 42024112 Abstract Dementia-related cognitive decline and ageing-related challenges impact social participation and relationships. Limited knowledge of dementia among family, friends and the public hinder support for interactions with those affected. Unmet social needs in community-living older adults with dementia remain underrecognized, despite their importance in healthy ageing and quality of life. This scoping review mapped existing evidence on unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia, including how these needs vary across dementia stages. We conducted a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Four databases were searched (2000 –April 2025) in English, Portuguese and Mandarin, yielding 24 included articles. Seven themes of unmet social needs were identified: (i) participation in out-of-home activities, (ii) support for maintaining independence in daily life (iii) companionship, (iv) meaningful relationships, (v) respectful and dignified social interactions, (vi) emotional support, and (vii) social needs during the pandemic. Unmet social needs differed by dementia stage: in mild dementia, unmet social needs mostly relate to out-of-home activities, while in moderate and severe stages unmet social needs shifted towards daily activities, companionship and emotional support. Stigma emerged as a transversal influence shaping experiences of unmet social need across stages and contexts. Unmet social needs evolve across dementia stages and are influenced by relational, socio-cultural and structural factors. Future research should include more advanced stages, diverse populations, and strategies for addressing social needs from their own perspectives. Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, community-living, dementia, interpersonal relations, needs assessment, older adults, social participation Introduction The World Health Organization's (WHO) Decade of Healthy Ageing defines “healthy aging” as “the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables well-being in older age.” 1 Functional abilities encompass the capacity to meet one's basic needs; learn, grow, and make decisions; maintain mobility; contribute to society; and build and maintain relationships. The ability to engage in social activities and maintain interpersonal connections is therefore a fundamental component of healthy aging. Drawing on the WHO decade of Healthy Ageing framework, 1 we conceptualize social needs as opportunities for social participation and engagement, including the ability to maintain meaningful interpersonal relationships and social activities. In addition, the Social Production Functions theory recognizes three core social needs 2 , 3 : affection, behavioral confirmation and status . Affection is defined as the need to give and receive love independent of personal abilities or resources. Behavioral confirmation refers to the need to feel that one's actions are ‘‘right’’ by oneself and others, and to have a sense of belonging with groups with shared values. Status relates to the need to distinguish oneself from others based on individual abilities, roles or resources. 2 Based on these frameworks, unmet social needs are operationalized as: i) constraints that limit engagement in social activities; ii) hinderances to the maintenance of interpersonal relationships; and/or iii) barriers to the fulfilment of the core social needs. Dementia, a neurocognitive disorder affecting more than 55 million people worldwide, poses several challenges to social interaction and activities participation not only for people with dementia and their caregivers, but also for friends, wider social networks, and others within the care constellation. 4 , 5 Dementia is characterized by a decline in cognitive functioning, with impairments in areas such as memory, language, and social cognition. 6 Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) like apathy, agitation and anxiety can further hinder social engagement. 7 , 8 Literature suggests that older adults with dementia tend to report more unmet social needs than those without cognitive impairment. 9 During the mild stages of dementia, individuals can take part in community or social activities without help and may appear unimpaired to those who do not know them well. 10 In the moderate stage, signs and symptoms progress and become increasingly restricting. 10 In the severe stage, affected individuals may have complete dependence, inactivity, serious memory disturbances and physical signs. Consequently, maintaining social connections becomes increasingly difficult throughout the disease trajectory. In addition to cognitive decline, other aging-related factors further reduce social interaction. Retirement often leads to decreased daily contact with colleagues, while physical frailty and age-related health issues contribute to reduced mobility. 11 The loss of relatives, spouses, and close friends can further exacerbate social isolation, limiting opportunities to build new relationships. 11 , 12 Studies focusing on community-living older adults with dementia highlight numerous unmet intrapersonal and interpersonal social needs, particularly related to daytime activities (e.g., social, work, leisure, learning activities), receiving company (e.g., social contact, contact with friends), and receiving help with psychological distress (e.g., agitation, needs for sympathy and support). 13 – 16 Recognizing and addressing the unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia is crucial, as they are associated with a lower health-related quality of life and more symptoms of depression. 13 , 14 , 17 Two main measures have been used to assess unmet needs among older adults with dementia. The Camberwell Assessment of Needs for the Elderly (CANE) is one of the most commonly used tools for identifying met and unmet needs among older adults. It comprises 24 areas related to the care recipient and two areas focused on the caregiver, 16 , 18 covering areas such as social contact, accommodation, physical health, and access to information about their health condition. The CANE is typically administered by healthcare professionals and may not fully capture the subjective experiences of those living with dementia. Another widely used tool is the John Hopkins Dementia Care Needs Assessment (JHDCNA), which comprises seven areas related to the care recipient and six areas focused on the caregiver. The JHDCNA captures unmet social needs such as social engagement and interpersonal relationships within the Daily Activities domain, and it also addresses other areas including health care financing and general health care needs. Developed by clinical dementia care experts, the JHDCNA is clinician-administered, which may also limit the subjective inputs of those living with dementia. 14 Although qualitative methods such as interviews are also used to explore unmet needs among older adults with dementia, the majority of research in this area remains quantitative. 12 Previous reviews have mapped the evidence on the broader spectrum of unmet needs among older adults with dementia. A scoping review by Morrisby et al. 19 and a meta-analysis by Curnow et al., 20 identified needs in areas such as information, self-care, and peer support. However, none of the reviews 19 , 20 focused specifically on unmet social needs. Furthermore, a large part of the existing literature is based on the perspectives of caregivers or healthcare professionals, rather than on older adults with dementia themselves. 9 , 20 – 22 Although proxy reporting may be required in later stages of dementia due to reduced insight or capacity to complete questionnaires, dependence on proxy reports alone may fail to capture subjective social needs that are best understood from the perspective of older adults living with dementia. 21 Additionally, the current literature also does not provide clear insights on whether variations exist in unmet social needs across the stages of dementia. To address these gaps, we conducted a scoping review to map the existing evidence and identify gaps in the literature about the unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia, considering their own perspectives. Our primary research question was: (1) “What are the unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia considering their perspective?”. The secondary research question was: (2) “How those unmet needs evolve along the stages of dementia?” Methods This review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for scoping reviews 23 and is reported by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). 24 Scoping reviews are a well-established method to identify key characteristics or factors of a given concept and research gaps. 25 , 26 The protocol of this review was registered in the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols ( https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-12-0082/ ). The Population, Concept, Context (PCC) approach was used to outline inclusion and exclusion criteria ( Table 1 ). Inclusion criteria consisted of primary peer-reviewed articles written in English, Portuguese or Chinese published from year 2000 onwards. The decision to focus on literature published in the past 25 years was to ensure relevance to today's context of care practices, social structures and cultural understandings of dementia, and align with the WHO's (2020) paradigm of healthy aging. 1 It is acknowledged that some unmet social needs identified in studies conducted during this period may reflect changes in social interactions, expectations, and care arrangements, which differed significantly before, during and after the COVID 19 pandemic. A prior literature review on the subjective needs of people with dementia 27 confirmed that most studies in which people with dementia were interviewed were conducted from year 2000 or later. All types of research approaches were considered. Unpublished studies and grey literature (e.g., reports and conference abstracts, books, documents) as well as systematic reviews or meta-analyses were excluded to ensure the scoping review provides an overview of available evidence based on peer-reviewed research. 26 Table 1. Eligibility criteria according to the PCC approach. Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Population Older adults (≥65 years old) diagnosed with dementia. Other age groups Only caregivers Concept Unmet social needs, i.e., social and leisure activities, daytime activities, community life activities, engagement in meaningful occupation, social companionship, and interpersonal relationships. Other needs Needs of caregivers only Context Community-living Live in nursing care and residential homes, inpatient settings, or hospitals Open in a new tab Search strategy A search strategy was devised with the assistance of an academic librarian. An initial search on PubMed was conducted to explore and identify relevant English-language search terms aligned with the research questions for use in the search strategy. The same derived search terms were applied in all database searches, using the same filters and date ranges. Search terms included “older people” OR elderly OR “old person” OR “older adults”, dementia OR Alzheimer OR “Neurocognitive disorder”, “social needs” OR leisure OR occupation OR interact* OR activit*, home OR community OR “community-living”. Four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Academic Search Complete) were initially searched on 11 December 2023. The scoping review was updated with a final search conducted on 22 April 2025, across all previously used databases, with the exception of Academic Search Complete, which was no longer accessible through the institutional database subscriptions at the time of the search. Hand-search of key authors and citations of included studies was conducted to ensure all relevant studies were included. The search was supplemented by conducting manual citation searching of relevant papers, which resulted in 1 paper 16 being added to the included studies. The full search strategy is provided in Supplemental Table 1 . Screening procedure Following the JBI recommendations, the screening was performed in sequential steps. The proportion of screening conducted by each reviewer was further informed by the ‘Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review’. 28 Firstly, all search results were imported to Zotero, where the duplicate records were removed. Secondly, the first author (ST) conducted screening on all articles while the second author (MM) screened 20% of the articles. Where an abstract was unclear or its relevance was uncertain, it was added for full-text screening. Thirdly, full text was screened; the first author (ST) screened all articles while the second author (MM) independently screened 50% of the articles. For all three stages (title, abstract, and full text screening), both authors (ST and MM) discussed any disagreements to reach a consensus. Prior to the first stage, the first and second authors (ST and MM) performed a calibration exercise to ensure consistent application of the eligibility criteria. A random sample of 10% of titles and abstracts was independently screened by each reviewer. A high level of agreement (94.4%) above the recommended target of 90% was achieved between the two authors (ST and MM). All disagreements were solved through discussion between the first and second authors (ST and MM). Lastly, the reference list of all included articles was checked for additional relevant citations. If the full-text version of an article was inaccessible, the original authors were contacted. An additional screening of the reference list of a recent scoping review on ‘unmet care needs of older people’ 29 identified five papers that were added to the list of full texts screened. 15 , 16 , 30 – 32 The inclusion and exclusion criteria applied during the three stages (title, abstract, and full text) were defined following JBI's recommendations for scoping reviews ( Table 2 ). 23 All members of the review team are fluent in English. Additionally, the first author is also fluent in Mandarin, while the third, fourth and last authors are native Portuguese speakers. Table 2. Data extraction guidance sheet. Table entry Description First author; year; country e.g., Brittain, K., 2010, United Kingdom. Use the year of publication of the article. Use the country where the study was conducted. Aim Record the specific objective(s) of the study. Methods and instruments Record the study design (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods), and instruments used for collecting data on unmet social needs (e.g., questionnaire, interview, etc.). Participants When available to include sample size, sex; age; ethnicity, education; socioeconomic status; marital status; carer relationship; living arrangements; cognitive assessments Dementia type and stage Identify the dementia type(s) and stage(s) involved in the study. Findings on unmet social needs When available to include contributing factors and consequences of unmet social need(s)). Open in a new tab Data extraction A spreadsheet for extraction was created using Microsoft Excel to retrieve data from the included studies. The first and second reviewers (ST and MM) each extracted data from 50% of the studies and cross-verified the data to ensure completeness and accuracy. Extracted data (where available) included: authors, year of publication and country; study aim(s), methods and instruments (study design, instruments used for collecting data on unmet social needs); participants (sample size, sex; age; ethnicity, education; socioeconomic status; marital status; carer relationship; living arrangements; cognitive assessments; dementia diagnosis method, type and stage); unmet social needs. The data extraction guidance sheet is provided in Table 2 . Data analysis Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for study characteristics and thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative results following the six-stage approach recommended by Braun and Clarke. 33 Codes were developed inductively from the data, with themes generated from the reported experiences within the included studies through an iterative analytic process. The unit of analysis was the extracted qualitative data, which were coded sentence by sentence. The first reviewer (ST) familiarized with the data through repeated reading of the papers to gain a deep understanding of the content; systematically coded all relevant data in the papers; grouped related codes into potential themes; reviewed the themes against the entire coded data set; ensured themes were well-defined and finalized the themes; and presented the findings and themes according to the research questions. Throughout the process of thematic analysis, the first reviewer (ST) regularly shared and discussed the findings with the co-reviewers (LS, OR, and RMB). The final themes developed were discussed with the reviewers (LS, OR, and RMB) until a consensus was reached. A summary of the synthesized findings in a narrative form was provided. In line with the established guidelines, 23 , 24 a quality rating of the studies and an assessment of the risk of bias were not conducted. Results The search yielded 5071 records as potential articles for inclusion. After removing duplicates, 3190 articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts. One article 16 was manually added through citation searching. After excluding irrelevant articles, 96 publications were retrieved for full-text assessment of eligibility. In total, 24 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included. The PRISMA-ScR flowchart detailing this process is presented in Figure 1 . Detailed evidence regarding the included studies is presented in Table 3 . Figure 1. Open in a new tab PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. Table 3. Summary of the included studies. First author, date & country Aim(s) Methods and instruments Sample Dementia stage and type Brittain, K., 2010, United Kingdom 43 Explore the varied meanings and lived experiences of older people with dementia, in relation to everyday technologies in public spaces outside the home. Secondary analysis of qualitative data from two studies . N = 16 people with dementia and 3 informal carers. Stage: mild to moderate. Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. Chung, P., 2019, United Kingdom 54 To explore the user experiences of older people with dementia who had used homecare enablement to support transitions in daily life at home. Qualitative. Semi-structured interviews. N = 16 participants with dementia and 8 carers. Sex: 8 male, 8 female. Aged 70–90 years 8 carers: 3 male, 5 female; 5 spouses, 2 daughters-in-law, 1 son. Stage: not specified. Diagnostic method: not specified. Types: Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular-type and Lewy-body dementia. Clare, L., 2022, United Kingdom 35 To explore the impact of the pandemic on community-dwelling individuals with mild-to-moderate dementia and compare responses with pre-pandemic data. Mixed-methods cross-sectional observational. Telephone or online interview. Open-ended and close questions. N = 173 people with dementia and 242 carers (informants). Sex (PwD): 101 males (58.4%), 72 females (41.6%). Age: 74.33 years old (range 50–98). Education: no qualifications (20.8%), school leaving certificate at age 16 (18.5%), school leaving certificate at age 18 (37.6%), university (22.0%), missing (1.1%). Occupation: 12 Professionals (6.9%), 67 Managerial and technical (38.7%), 29 NM Skilled occupations – non-manual (16.8%), 32 M Skilled occupations – manual (18.5%), 20 Partly skilled (11.6%), 3 Unskilled (1.7%), 4 Armed forces (2.3%), 2 N/A (1.2%), 4 Missing (2.3%). Marital status: single (4.0%), married (50.9%), remarried (16.8%), civil partnership (1.2%), legally separated (1.2%), divorced (13.9%), widowed (8.7%), cohabiting (3.5%). Carer relationship: spouse/partner (86.8%), other family/friend (13.2%). Living: 21.4% alone, 74.6% with spouse/partner and 4% with other. Type: Alzheimer's disease (AD) (45.1%), vascular dementia (VaD)(9.8%), mixed AD and VaD (15.0%), frontotemporal (13.9%), Parkinson's disease dementia (4.6%), Lewy bodies (8.1%), unspecified/other (3.5%) Diagnostic method :not specified, however 5-min MoCA and Estimated MMSE equivalent to MoCA score recorded. Stage: mild to moderate. Darlington, N., 2021, United Kingdom 37 To answer the questions: (1) Are people living with dementia aware of their local dementia-friendly community (DFC)? (2) Does awareness of a local DFC affect their experience of living with dementia? (3) What would help people living with dementia to live well in their local community? (4) Can survey methodology be used successfully among people living with dementia? Cross-sectional survey. Survey over phone or mail. Completed independently or with support of carer. N = 240 people with dementia. Sex: 106 males (46%), 126 females (54%). Eight not specified. Age: less than 64 (7.8%), 65–74 (25.1%), 75–84 (45%), 85+ (22.1%), not specified (9%). Ethnicity: White British/White other (95%), Black, Asian and minority ethnic (5%). Living arrangements: All community dwelling, living across 6 DFCs. 59 lived alone (23%), 174 lived with others (74.7%), 7 did not report (2.3%). Stages: 127 early (57%), 72 middle (32.3%), 24 advanced (10.8%), 17 not specified (7.1%). Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. Dawson, E., 2023, United Kingdom 36 To explore how experiences of coping with the effects of the pandemic in the UK changed over time (after 22 months of social restrictions in England and Wales). Mixed method. Qualitative semi- structured interviews. N = 9 people with dementia Sex: 4 female, 5 male. Age range: 51 to 89 years old. Living arrangements: All living in the community. 5 lived alone, 4 lived with spouse/partner. Education: university degree (4), school leaving certificate at age 16 (2), professional qualification (1), vocational qualification (1), apprenticeship (1). Type: Alzheimer's disease (5), frontotemporal dementia (2), posterior cortical atrophy (1), mixed dementia (1). Diagnostic method: not specified. Stages: Three to eight years since diagnosis of dementia. 3 years (1), 6 years (4), 7 years (3), 8 years (1). Dickins, M., 2018, Australia 50 To understand how different groups of individuals conceptualize the issue of risk for those living with dementia. Qualitative. Semi-structured interviews. N = 7 people with dementia. Sex: 3 females, 4 males. Mean age: 66 (S.D. 11.6). Stages: Not specified. Mean years since diagnosis: 4.5 years (S.D. 2.2). Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: Not specified. Eades, M., 2018, United Kingdom 44 To trial the first intervention that brought cultural activities led by professional artists to isolated people with mild and moderate dementia in their own homes. Qualitative. Open-ended Interviews. N = 6 people with dementia, 4 artists, 3 befrienders Sex: 3 males, 3 females Age: Seventies (3), eighties (1), nineties (1). Living arrangements: Lived in own homes (4), sheltered accommodation (2). Stage: Mild or moderate dementia (through inclusion criteria). Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: Not specified. Eichler, T., 2016, Germany 51 To describe the number and types of unmet needs of German primary care patients screened positive for dementia and factors associated with the number of unmet needs. Cross-sectional analysis of randomized controlled trial. Interview based on standardised questionnaires. N = 227 people with dementia. Sex: 121 females (53.3%), 106 males (46.7%). Mean age: 80.3 years old. Living arrangements: 115 lived alone (50.9%), 110 lived with others (49.1%). Stage: From no impairment to severe impairment. Diagnostic method: screened by primary care practitioner to fulfil the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision(ICD-10) and have a Demenz-Detektion-score < 9 (DemTect). Cognitive impairment (MMSE): 22.1 (5.3). No impairment 50 (22.9%), Mild impairment 109 (50.0%), Moderate impairment 54 (24.8%), Severe impairment 5 (2.3%). Type: No formal diagnosis of dementia 145 (63.9%), Alzheimer's disease 20 (8.8%), Vascular dementia 22 (9.7%), Dementia in Parkinson's disease 4 (1.8%), Unspecified dementia 47 (20.7%), Other degenerative diseases 6 (2.6%). Flatt, J. D., 2015, USA 39 To describe the subjective experiences of older adults with early-stage Alzheimer's disease or related cognitive disorders (ADRDs) and their family caregivers regarding an art museum engagement activity. Qualitative. Focus groups. N = 10 persons with ADRD and 10 family caregivers. Sex: 5 females (50%), 50% 5 males (50%). Age: 8 were >60 years. Ethnicity: Caucasian (7), African American (3). Dyads all had their own transportation to the museum and were physically able to participate in the walking part of the guided tour. Stage: Early-stage Alzheimer's disease (8), Alzheimer's Disease related cognitive disorder (2). Diagnostic method: evaluation performed by the University of Pittsburgh Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Type: not specified. Hicks, B., 2020, United Kingdom 52 To address social exclusion among rural-dwelling older men with dementia in an English county. Participatory Action Research (PAR). Focus groups, open interviews, reflexive field-notes. N = 22 people with dementia, 15 care partners, 5 community volunteers. Sex: All male. Age : 68–90. Living arrangements: All community-dwelling. Main carer: Wife (18), lives alone (3), employs live-in helper (1) Ethnicity: All White British Stage: 3 to 12 year since diagnosis. Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. Manson, A., 2020, USA 45 To describe perceptions of life satisfaction in early-to mid-stage Alzheimer's disease from both patient and caregiver perspectives. Exploratory qualitative. Semi-structured dyadic interviews. N = 4 PwD and caregivers. Sex: 3 female PwD/ male caregiver dyads, 1 male PwD/female caregiver dyad. Age: 55–80 years old. Living arrangement: All community dwelling, lives with caregiver. Ethnicity: All Caucasian non-Hispanic Stage : Early-to mid-stage (mean MMSE = 22). Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. (recruited from a local Alzheimer's Association early-stage support group). Mazurek, J., 2019, Poland 16 To assess the needs of people with dementia living at home. Cross-sectional study. Instruments: CANE, socio-demographic and QoL data. N = 47 PwD, 41 informal carers. Sex: 34 females (72.3%), 13 males (27.7%). Mean age: 76.6 years (S.D. 13.3) Marital status: 24 Married (51.1%), 22 Widowed (46.8%), 1 Partner relationship (2.1%). Education: 15 Higher education (31.9%), 23 Vocational level 3 (48.9%), 4 Vocational level 2 (8.5%), 4 Qualification at level I or below (8.5%), 1 No qualifications (2.1%). Main carer: 23 Children (48.9%), 18 Spouse (38.3%). Stage: Mild to moderate dementia (mean MMSE = 20.9 points +/-3.4) Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. Miranda-Castillo, C., 2013, United Kingdom 18 To compare perceived needs from the perspectives of people with dementia, family caregivers, and professionals. Cross sectional survey. CANE interviews by psychologist and old age psychiatrists. N = 125 PwD, 125 family caregivers. Mean age: 79.2 years (S.D. 6.8). Sex: 74 males (48.7%) and 78 females (51.3%). Ethnicity: White (98.7%), Black (0.7%), Asian (0.7%). First language: English (97.3%), Other (2.7%). Education: Higher education (20.3%), Secondary (75.6%, Below secondary (4.1%) Marital status: Single (2%), Married/living with partner (55.3%), Separated/divorced (4.6%), Widowed (38.2%). Living situation: Lives alone (32.9%), lives with others (67.1%) Has caregiver: Yes (90.1%), No (9.9%). Stage: Mild to moderate (MMSE = 19.13 (S.D. 7.2) Diagnostic method: via the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria (DSM-IV). Type: not specified. Morrisby, C., 2019, Australia 48 To identify support needs from the perspectives of people with dementia and their spousal carers. Interpretive description study. Semi-structured dyadic interviews and two focus groups. N = 10 dyads. Sex: Not specified. Assumed 4 males and 6 females, based on pseudonyms. Mean age: 75 years. Living arrangement: All community-living, cared for by a spouse. Stage: moderate (FAST: ranged = 4- 6.4, median = 5). Diagnostic method: via the Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) by the researchers. Type: not specified. Moyle, W., 2011, Australia 40 To explore the perceptions of loneliness from the perspectives of people with early-stage dementia, living in community and long-term care settings Descriptive exploratory qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews. N = 70 PwD and 73 family carers. Sex: females (72.5%), males (27.5%). Age range: 66–97 years. Living arrangement: 60 LTC, 10 community. Stage: Early stage Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. Stapley, S., 2025, United Kingdom 38 To assess what is important for ‘living well’ with mild-to-moderate dementia and how this changes over time. Qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews, Sociograms as visual representations. N = 20 PwD Sex: 10 Male, 10 female Age: 65- 86 years. Type: Alzheimer's disease (n = 15), vascular dementia (n = 2), mixed dementia (n = 2), frontotemporal dementia (=1) Diagnostic method: clinical diagnosis by National Health Service memory services and other specialist clinics. Stage: Mild to moderate. (MMSE at 3 years prior to first interview in 2017): 22- 30; Time since diagnosis: Less than 1 year (n = 8), 1–2 years (n = 4), 3–5 years (n = 5), less than 3 years (n = 1), not available (n = 2)) Strandenæs, M. G., 2018, Norway 46 To explore experiences of day care attendees’ living with dementia. Qualitative descriptive study. Individual interviews, and interviews of next of kin. N = 17 PwD Sex: 10 females, 7 males. Mean age: 80.5 years (range 72–92). Living arrangements: 9 lives alone, 8 lives with caregiver. Stage : from very mild to moderate (Clinical Dementia Rating: Very mild (3), mild (11), moderate (3)). Diagnostic method : via the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Type : not specified. Suwa, S., 2018, Japan 49 To explore the experiences of a nonagenarian-centenarian woman with dementia living alone. Qualitative content analysis of diary. N = 1. Age: 106 years Sex: female. Living arrangement: Lives alone. Type: Alzheimer's disease. Diagnostic method: by a physician, using the Hasegawa's Dementia Scale. Stage was severe dementia from 2010 to 2013. Svanström, R., 2015, Sweden 53 To elucidate the phenomenon of living alone with dementia and having a manifest care need. Phenomenological interviews. Field notes and transcriptions from tape-recorded conversations were analysed. N = 6 PwD Sex: 5 females, 1 male. Age: 80–90 years years. Living arrangement: All lived alone, had home care services on a daily basis, enrolled in day care services several days a week Has children: Yes (4), No (2). Type: not specified Diagnostic method: not specified. Stage: not specified. Tranvåg, O., 2015, Norway 47 To explore and describe qualities of relational interactions preserving dignity among people with dementia, while interacting with family, social network, and healthcare professionals. Qualitative research study. Interviews conducted with a modifiable interview guide. N = 11 PwD Sex: 5 females, 6 males. Age: 64–85 years. Living arrangement: Lives with spouse in their own homes. Ethnicity: 8 native Norwegians, 2 born in other European countries, 1 was originally from Asia. The latter 3 had lived their adult lives in Norway. Stage: mild to moderate. Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: Alzheimer's Disease (10),; mild cognitive impairment (1). van der Roest, H. G., 2009, Netherlands 27 To assess needs of community-dwelling people with dementia as reported by themselves and their informal carers. Cross-sectional design. N = 236 PwD and 322 informal carers Sex: 182 female (54.8%), 150 male (45.2%) Mean age: 79.8 (S.D. 7.6) years Marital status: Married (57.8%), Widowed (33.4%), Other (8.7%), Lived alone (36.5%) Education: 30 High level of education (12.7%), 6 Unknown (2.5%). Living arrangement: All community-living. Stage: No cognitive decline (GDS 1) (n = 3, 1.3%), very mild cognitive decline (GDS 2) (n = 27, 11.4%), mild cognitive decline (GDS 3) (n = 51, 21.6%), moderate cognitive declined (GDS 4) (n = 76, 32.2%), moderately severe cognitive decline (GDS 5) (n = 44, 18.6%), severe cognitive decline (GDS 6) (n = 16, 6.8%), very severe cognitive decline (GDS 7) (Nil), severity unknown (n = 19, 8.1%). Diagnostic method: Global Deterioration Scale. Type: Alzheimer's disease (n = 91, 38.6%), vascular dementia (n = 33, 14.0%), mixed dementia (n = 29, 12.3%), other type (n = 22, 8.5%), type unknown (n = 63, 26.7%). Van’t Leven, N., 2019, Netherlands 42 To examine how dyadic interventions fit the needs, characteristics, and preferences of people with dementia and their informal caregivers. Qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews. N = 34 dyads, 19 professionals Sex: 22 males, 12 females Main carer: 28 partners, 6 parent/child. Stage: Onset 1–5 years prior; average onset 2.4- 2.9 years. Diagnostic method: not specified. Type: not specified. Wilkins, J. M., 2022, USA 41 To examine values and preferences of community-dwelling persons with cognitive impairment and explore potential predictors of everyday preferences. Cross-sectional study. Instrument: Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI). N = 62 older adults with cognitive impairment Sex: males (57%), females (43%). Mean age: 78.9 years (S.D 7.1) Education: Mean 16.5 years (S.D. 2.8) Ethnicity: White (88.7%), Black or African American (6.5%), Asian (3.2%), American Indian or Alaska Native (1.6%) Marital status: Married/domestic partner (75.8%), Widowed (14.5%), Divorced (6.5%), Separated (1.6%), Never married (1.6%) Living arrangement: All community-living. Type: Amnestic (76.9%), Lewy Body (7.7%), Non-amnestic (15.4%), MCI (35.5%), Cognitively Impaired, non-MCI (43.5%). Diagnostic method : by physician, using the Clinical Dementia Rating global score. Stage : not specified. (CDR Score : 0.5 (82.3%), 1 (17.7%). Mean MoCA score: 23.4 (S.D. 4.5)) Willis, R., 2020, Pakistan 34 To understand perspective on help-seeking, understanding of diagnosis, stigma, and religion among people with dementia in Pakistan. Exploratory qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews, with caregiver assistance where needed. N = 20 PwD. Sex: 9 Females, 11 Males. Age: 40–49 (1), 50–59 (1), 60–69 (6), 70–79 (8), 80–89 (3), 90–99 (1). Living arrangements: all lives with caregiver in the community. Former occupation: Housewife (6), Business (3), Artist (1), Mosque administrator (1), Pharmacist (1), Teacher (2), University faculty (1), Contractor (1), Radio worker (1), Engineer (1), Not known (2). Stage: mild stage. Diagnostic method : not specified. Type: not specified. Open in a new tab Overview of the included studies The included studies were published between 2009 to 2025, of which 19 (79%) were published since 2015. Nine studies were conducted in the United Kingdom (37%), three in the United States of America (12.5%), three in Australia (12.5%), two in the Netherlands (8.3%), two in Norway (8.3%), and a study each (4.1%) in Sweden, Germany, Poland, Pakistan and Japan. Nineteen studies (75%) used qualitative methods and five used quantitative methods (25%). The included studies reported information on 1382 older adults with dementia. Twenty studies (83%) recruited participants aged ≥ 65 years, except for four studies which included participants of an age range of 40–99 34 ; 50–98 35 ; 51–89 36 ; and younger than 64 years. 37 56% of participants were female. Three studies were part of the British IDEAL cohort study. 35 , 36 , 38 The participants were in distinct dementia stages. Most studies involved participants who were in the earlier stages, with four specifically including participants in the mild stage 34 , 39 – 41 ; ten studies included participants who were in mild to moderate stages. 16 , 18 , 35 , 38 , 42 – 47 Two studies involved participants with moderate stage dementia, 36 , 48 and one study included participants with severe-stage dementia. 49 Five studies spanned multiple stages from mild to severe-stage dementia. 27 , 37 , 50 – 52 Two studies did not specify the dementia stage. 53 , 54 In terms of diagnosis, 12 studies provided specific information, reporting on a range of dementia types, including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mixed Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson's disease dementia, and frontotemporal dementia. The remaining 12 studies did not specify the type of dementia. Unmet social needs Seven categories of unmet social needs were identified ( Table 4 ), addressing the first research question. Each unmet social need is described in detail, based on the reported experiences from the included studies. The second research question aims to describe how unmet social needs vary across the dementia stages. Many studies did not include participants from a single stage of dementia, which limited our ability to draw stage-related trends. Variations across the stages of dementia are described based only on studies involving single stage participants ( Table 4 ). In addition to stage-related patterns, the analysis also identified several cross-cutting influences that shaped how unmet social needs emerged and were experienced. Among these, stigma appears consistently as an embedded and transversal factor influencing social participation, help-seeking, and interpersonal relationships. Table 4. Main findings from included studies. First author, date & country Main findings Unmet needs for participation in out-of-home activities Outdoor social activities Darlington et al., 2021, United Kingdom 37 Reduced opportunities to engage in activities such work, meeting friends/ family, leisure activities, shopping etc. Strandenæs et al, 2018, Norway 46 Participants felt that activities offered at day care does not fully match their personal preferences and interests. Svanström & Sundler, 2015, Sweden 53 Participants began to lose engagement with activities that they previously liked and provided opportunities for social interaction. Eichler et al., 2016, Germany 51 Participants indicated unmet needs for social activities. Stapley et al., 2025, United Kingdom 38 Participants reported challenges in maintaining hobbies. Wilkins et al., 2022, USA 41 Participants rated social engagement (e.g., family contact, meeting new people, volunteering) as significantly more important than other aspects of everyday living. Gaming Hicks et al., 2020, United Kingdom 52 Reduced options for games that promote enjoyment without the pressures to perform to a certain standard. Art-based activities Flatt et al, 2015., USA 39 Participant had concerns about not being able to actively participate in (art-based) activities, due to lack of more detailed descriptions of the activity. Cultural activities Eades et al., 2018, United Kingdom 44 Participants had reduced participation in cultural activities such as playing the guitar or being in a drama group. Opportunities to contribute to others Darlington et al., 2021, United Kingdom 37 Participants desired for activities such as being able to continue driving and be able to teach others. Wilkins et al., 2022, USA 41 Participants rated social engagement (e.g., Family contact, meeting new people, volunteering) as significantly more important than other aspects of everyday living. Daytime activities Miranda-Castillo et al., 2013, United Kingdom 18 Participants reported unmet needs in the areas of ‘daytime activities’ in the Camberwell Assessment of Needs for the Elderly. Mazurek et al., 2019, Poland 16 Unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily life At home Chung, 2019, United Kingdom 54 Participants want to use their abilities to keep doing what they can, such as keeping the house tidy, instead of solely depending on their family's help. Manson et al., 2020, USA 45 Participants want to be able to remember their own appointments so that they do not impose on others. Suwa et al., 2018, Japan 49 The participant wanted to be as independent as possible in living alone and even refusing care from family and care staff. Van’t Leven et al., 2019, Netherlands 42 Participants did not find themselves to be self-sufficient in daily activities and required assistance from their caregivers. In public Darlington et al., 2021, United Kingdom 37 People with dementia have stopped one or more activities because of the lack of required support in public spaces. Svanström & Sundler, 2015, Sweden 53 People with dementia reported feeling reluctant to leave the home alone due to not having support with unfamiliar environments. Brittain et al., 2010, United Kingdom 43 Participants felt out of home activities have become increasingly constrained by the anxiety of family members. Stapley et al., 2025, United Kingdom 38 Participants avoided going out on their own without their carers In work environment Dickins et al., 2018, Australia 50 Participants reported the feeling of isolation while they experience of loss of independence in activities, such as driving, working and finances. Participants expressed their feeling that they could have continued working if reasonable adjustments were made. Stapley et al., 2025, United Kingdom 38 Participants reported that they missed work since their retirement and needed to keep themselves busy with activities. In religiosity Willis et al., 2020, Pakistan 34 Participants explained how difficulty with orientation in time interferes with knowing the correct time of day to offer prayers. In mobility and transportation Moyle et al., 2011, Australia 40 Participants reported mobility challenges impacting their participation in activities. Morrisby et al., 2019, Australia 48 Participants found that the experience and transition of losing their driving ability was distressing. Manson et al., 2020, USA 45 Participants reported changes in their ability to drive affecting their participation in activities. Darlington et al., 2021, United Kingdom 37 Participants commonly reported that they do not continue to drive and felt there could be better public transport options. Unmet need for companionship Friends and family members Moyle et al., 2011, Australia 40 Participants desire for more visits from family. Participants felt the absence of family and friends particularly during certain times of day and occasions. Svanström & Sundler, 2015, Sweden 53 Participants wish for more visits from family and friends for companionship and conversation. Suwa et al., 2018, Japan 49 The participant's does not have visitors as she lives alone. Some of her family members lived a distance away, while others have passed away. Friends Hicks et al., 2020, United Kingdom 52 An individual described that he has difficulty feeling comfortable with being friends with others in the group. They are facing similar situations (dementia), and that is the only thing they have in common. Stapley et al., 2025, United Kingdom 38 An individual described not having new friends, and wanting new friendships just like his wife is able to. Company Miranda-Castillo et al., 2013, United Kingdom 18 Participants reported unmet needs in the areas of ‘company’ in the Camberwell Assessment of Needs for the Elderly. Mazurek et al., 2019, Poland 16 van der Roest et al., 2009, Netherlands 27 Unmet need for meaningful relationships Maintenance of meaningful relationships Moyle et al., 2011, Australia 40 Participants reported the absence and loss of meaningful relationships. Svanström & Sundler, 2015, Sweden 53 Participants losing contact with people who are not close to them. Social networks knowledge and understanding about dementia Morrisby et al., 2019, Australia 48 Participants perceived that people in their broader social networks such as work colleagues, lacked knowledge and understanding of dementia. Stapley et al, 2025, United Kingdom 38 Participants perceived that people in their broader social networks such as friends, colleagues, lacked knowledge and understanding of dementia. Family understanding and acceptance of dementia Suwa et al, 2018, Japan 49 The participant felt that she was uninvited to her grandchild's wedding ceremony due to her dementia. Willis et al, 2020, Pakistan 34 Some family members thought that the person with dementia was pretending. Family and friends understanding and acceptance of dementia Moyle et al., 2011, Australia 40 Participants report that family and friends could not understand, accept or come to terms with the changes in the person with dementia Maintenance of conjugal relationship Stapley et al., 2025, United Kingdom 38 An individual reported that behavioural changes strained their spousal relationships and increased dependence on their spouse for social interactions. Unmet need for respectful and dignified social interactions Public and community understanding Darlington et al., 2021, United Kingdom 37 People with dementia felt that better public knowledge of what it is like to live with dementia will help them to live well in their community. People with dementia desired living in a community free from stigma. Hicks et al., 2020, United Kingdom 52 Participants faced uneasy tensions in a group, when there are conflicting interests, facing disparaging comments or others refusing to engage with them. Respect (privacy) regarding dementia diagnosis Darlington et al., 2021, United Kingdom 37 Participants did not want attention drawn to their dementia diagnosis. Morrisby et al., 2019, Australia 48 A participant chose not to disclose their diagnosis and told acquaintances they had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Respect in transition points Morrisby et al., 2019, Australia 48 Participants felt that there was a lack of respectful communication when they had to give up driving Respect of sense of masculinity Hicks et al., 2020, United Kingdom 52 A participant distanced himself from perceived vulnerability, after facing resistance from being integrated into a group, and felt that his sense of masculinity was threatened. Respect as fully capable individuals Eades et al., 2018, United Kingdom 44 Participants felt that they are not provided the same rights to be heard or fully participate in some activities. Respect from healthcare professionals Tranvåg et al., 2015, Norway 47 Participants reported healthcare professionals made them feel overlooked and devalued, not being acknowledged as an equal and making them feel small or unimportant. Chung, 2019, United Kingdom 54 Some participants felt that home care staff failed to listen to participants’ viewpoints and were being ignored by staff who seemed to spend a lot of time writing reports rather than offering time for a meaningful conversation with them. Unmet need for emotional support From professionals during service provision Morrisby et al., 2019, Australia 48 Through the process from diagnosis to ongoing care participants perceived a lack of empathy from healthcare professionals, leaving them feeling unsupported, resulting in some turning to private healthcare. Regarding psychological distress Suwa et al., 2018, Japan 49 The participant experienced distress whenever the home helper who visits comes in daily, without permission. Miranda-Castillo et al., 2013, United Kingdom 18 Participants reported unmet needs in the areas of ‘psychological distress’ in the Camberwell Assessment of Needs for the Elderly. Mazurek et al., 2019, Poland 16 van der Roest et al., 2009, Netherlands 27 During bereavement of a significant person Moyle et al., 2011, Australia 40 Participants were impacted by the loss of human connection and sharing after the death of someone close to them. Unmet social needs during pandemic Outdoor social activities Dawson et al., 2023, United Kingdom 36 Reduced participation in activities such as social events, exercise classes, travelling and substituting with indoor activities such as knitting, reading, and watching television. Participants also felt their communication skills and mental well-being declined when they did not have access to in-person dementia groups. Spouse companionship Feeling distant from wife who now lives in a care home. Opportunities for meaningful conversations Participants felt they lack meaningful conversations due to the closure of dementia advocacy and social groups. Emotional support from professionals Participants felt like although they needed formal or professional emotional support, it does not exist. Participants felt the lack of social support that was once provided by the dementia groups (when the groups closed due to pandemic). Support from others to maintain independence in mobility and transportation Clare et al., 2022, United Kingdom 35 Participants reported difficulties with mobility. Companionship from family members Participant felt that more family members were in contact compared to earlier during the pandemic. However, this did not directly translate to a higher satisfaction in family support. Open in a new tab Unmet need for participation in out-of-home activities The unmet need for participation in out-of-home activities was reported in eleven studies. 16 , 18 , 37 – 39 , 41 , 44 , 46 , 51 – 53 It encompasses social, cultural, recreational, and outdoor activities such as meeting friends or family, attending events, or engaging in hobbies. These activities provide enjoyment, social connection, and a sense of purpose. This theme was described for the mild stage of dementia. 39 , 41 Older adults with dementia desired art-based engagement; however, a lack of clear information about activities like museum visits was highlighted as a barrier to participation. 39 Using the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI), Wilkins et al. 41 found that social engagement, including maintaining regular contact and volunteering, was highly valued yet often unfulfilled. This study's findings further revealed that social engagement was rated significantly more important than other everyday life domains, such as autonomous choice, personal growth, and maintaining a routine. Studies which involved participants of mixed stages of dementia reported their desire to participate in out-of-home activities, yet barriers such as financial constraints and cognitive decline limit their involvement. 37 , 46 , 51 Some participants reminisced about past cultural engagements or hobbies, which became challenging to maintain after dementia onset, a challenge further exacerbated by service and support closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 36 , 38 , 44 Among some older adults with dementia, activities that were once important, such as hobbies, engagement in clubs, and travelling, were described as becoming less meaningful and or enjoyable over time. 53 Performance pressures during gaming activities was found to discourage participation among individuals with dementia. 52 In two studies using the CANE instrument, ‘daytime activities’ was a significant unmet need - identified as the second most common unmet need in Miranda-Castillo et al. 18 (14.5%) and the third most common in Mazurek et al. 16 (25.5%). Unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily life Twelve studies reported on the unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily living. 34 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 45 , 48 – 50 , 53 , 54 This theme was described for the mild 34 , 40 moderate 48 and severe 49 stages of dementia. In the mild stage, Moyle et al. 40 reported that mobility challenges such as needing walkers or wheelchairs restricted their social participation. Willis et al. 34 found that participants placed importance on maintaining independence in cultural routines such as religious practices. In the moderate stage, Morrisby et al. 48 described how participants increasingly required support in daily activities due to reduced mobility and loss of driving privileges. Losing driving privileges was particularly distressing, especially when the decision was communicated by authorities or professionals in ways perceived as lacking sensitivity or respect. 48 In the severe stage, a case study by Suwa et al. 49 highlighted a participant's strong desire to live independently while living alone. Among studies which involved participants with mixed stages of dementia, needs for maintaining independence in daily life were identified across four areas: (i) their own homes, (ii) public spaces; (iii) workplaces, and (iv) mobility and transport. In their own homes, rather than solely relying on family support, many older adults with dementia wanted to continue engaging in household tasks to preserve their sense of self and purpose. Some resisted help when it was perceived as undermining their abilities, even if their families or carers felt it was necessary. 54 Others acknowledged the need for assistance with specific activities, such as using household devices or managing routines, which reflected a need for balance between autonomy and support. 42 , 45 In public spaces, a lack of support in public environments led some older adults to stop going out entirely, or avoid being on their own in unfamiliar settings. 37 , 38 , 53 Additionally, family members’ concerns about safety often resulted in restrictions on independent mobility, contributing to reduced social participation and feelings of isolation. 43 In workplaces, loss of employment was associated with a loss of identity and purpose. 38 , 50 Some older adults with dementia felt they could have continued working if reasonable accommodations had been made, but instead faced abrupt restrictions following their diagnosis. 50 In mobility and transport, some individuals limit themselves to familiar routes when leaving their homes. 37 Unmet need for companionship Eight studies reported the unmet need for companionship. 16 , 18 , 27 , 38 , 40 , 49 , 52 , 53 This includes regular contact with family, friends, or social groups, even if the interactions were casual or not deeply personal. Individuals expressed a desire for more visits from family and friends, frequent conversations, and opportunities to engage socially to avoid feeling isolated. This theme was described for the mild stage 40 and severe 49 stage of dementia. In the mild stage, Moyle et al. 40 found that participants often felt the absence of regular interaction, especially during times such as holidays or nighttime. One participant described loneliness being most pronounced at night when not accompanied by his spouse. 40 In the severe stage, Suwa et al. 49 presented a case who described the emotional impact of living alone and having children who rarely visited. 49 Among studies which included individuals with mixed stages of dementia, the need for companionship was not limited to family members, and the presence of any visitor regardless of their relationship provided a sense of meaning and connection. 53 Some older adults with dementia felt isolated despite being part of dementia groups, suggesting that shared experiences of dementia did not necessarily lead to quality interactions. 52 An individual reported that he would like to make new friends, and compared himself to his wife who could. 38 In studies using the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE), the need for company was ranked the second 16 and third 18 , 27 most commonly reported unmet need cited by 29.8%, 12.8% and 5.4% of participants respectively. Unmet need for meaningful relationships Six studies reported the unmet need for meaningful relationship. 34 , 38 , 40 , 48 , 49 , 53 These studies highlighted the need for quality relationships that are emotionally fulfilling, which includes maintaining trusting and reciprocal relationships with close family, friends, and caregivers who are able to help the person living with dementia to feel understood, accepted and valued. This theme was described for the mild, 34 , 40 moderate 48 and severe 49 stages of dementia. In the mild stage, Moyle et al. 40 reported that family members did not understand the cognitive changes associated with dementia, sometimes perceiving memory lapses as intentional, leading to feelings of guilt and frustration. Similarly, Willis et al. 34 found that family members were reported to suspect the older adult with dementia was “pretending” to forget, which strained family relations. In the moderate stage, participants felt that people in their broader social networks, such as colleagues, lacked an understanding of dementia, which contributed to feelings of being stigmatized. 48 In the severe stage, an individual expressed sadness at not being invited to a grandchild's wedding, interpreting that she was left out due to her condition. 49 Among studies involving participants with mixed stages of dementia, the perceived lack of empathy and understanding within families and friends often led to feelings of shame or being dismissed. 38 One individual reported behavioural changes having a negative effect on their spousal relationship, and being more dependent on their spouse for social interactions. 38 Others reported the lack of meaningful relationship due to the deterioration and challenges of maintaining close connections over time. 53 Unmet need for respectful and dignified social interaction Six studies reported on the unmet need for respectful and dignified treatment. 37 , 44 , 47 , 48 , 52 , 54 This includes unmet needs related to public knowledge and attitudes towards dementia, and the need to be treated with respect and dignity. The groups of people identified were families, friends, and broader social networks such as members of dementia support groups. Experiences reported include stigma, lack of understanding and acceptance, privacy of their diagnosis and difficulties in receiving the support they need. It includes situations where the person's voices and opinions were disregarded, leading to frustration and feeling undervalued. This theme was described for the moderate stage of dementia by one study, 48 which highlighted a lack of respectful communication during transitions, such as during the process of losing the driver's licence; participants also felt that there is still a stigma associated with dementia that led some to choose not to disclose their diagnosis. Among studies involving individuals with mixed stages of dementia, community dwelling individuals perceived that the public needs a better understanding of what is it like to live with dementia. 37 To avoid unwanted attention drawn to their diagnosis, some individuals choose to keep their diagnosis private. 37 In a group of men who attended a game-based social support program, one individual faced disparaging comments and social exclusion. 52 This lack of respect from the group made him feel that his sense of masculinity was under threat. 52 Another topic within this theme regards the perception that the right to be heard and capacity to participate fully in activities were not respected. 44 In their interactions with healthcare professionals, some participants felt that they were not acknowledged as an equal, resulting to them feeling overlooked and ignored. 47 , 54 Unmet need for emotional support Six studies reported on the unmet need for emotional support. 16 , 18 , 27 , 40 , 48 , 49 This theme focuses on needs related to the emotional and psychological well-being of older adults with dementia. Individuals reported needs for emotional and psychological support to engage in social situations, and cope with psychological distress or bereavement. This includes formal sources of emotional support from professionals. This theme was described for the mild, 40 moderate 48 and severe 49 stages of dementia. In the mild stage, one participant described the loneliness experienced when reminiscing about shared experiences with a late loved one. 40 In the moderate stage, Morrisby et al. 48 reported a need for better emotional support during diagnosis and ongoing care. Some individuals perceived a lack of empathy from healthcare professionals, leaving them feeling dismissed or uncared for. One participant shared his disappointment with the memory clinic he attended, stating that some staff members “don't care”. 48 In the severe stage, a participant experienced emotional distress when caregiving routines were perceived as intrusive, particularly when an assigned home helper entered the home without permission. 49 In the studies involving individuals with mixed stages of dementia, psychological distress consistently emerged as the leading 16 , 18 and third 27 unmet need assessed with the CANE, indicating the prevalence of emotional support as an unmet social need. Unmet social needs during pandemic Two studies reported unmet social needs that were related to the COVID-19 pandemic. 35 , 36 Public health restrictions on social gatherings and the closure of community services led to increased social disconnection and isolation of older adults with dementia. Many individuals reported fewer opportunities for social interaction and meaningful conversation, contributing to feelings of isolation and decrease in emotional/psychological well-being. This theme was described for the mild stage of dementia by one study. 36 The participants described the closure of dementia advocacy and social groups as particularly impactful. These groups had previously offered companionship, shared experience and advisors. The loss of such social connections due to the closure of groups left many feeling increasingly isolated. An additional factor contributing to social isolation reported in Dawson's et al. 36 was the restriction of social gatherings beyond official guidelines, avoiding public places and events out of fear of harm to themselves or others. In place of group activities, some participants relied on solitary activities within the home such as knitting, reading, and watching television to remain occupied, although these did not fully replace the value of in-person connection. Over time, sustained isolation and lack of opportunities for social interactions led to marked declines in communication skills and mental well-being. As opportunities for social integration returned, several participants felt discomfort and frustrations when easing back into these social environments. Clare et al. 35 involved individuals in mixed stages of dementia. While some participants observed an increase in family contact during the pandemic, this did not translate into stronger sense of emotional support or connection. 35 In the same study, 39.3% reported difficulties in daily activities and 44.5% reported difficulties with mobility, both of which may limit their social participation. Variation in unmet social needs across dementia stages Most studies included participant across multiple stages of dementia without distinguishing the specific unmet social needs in each stage. Therefore, stage-specific observations could only be drawn from a small number of studies ( Table 5 ). Table 5. Variation by stages. Stage Themes Mild Flatt et al., 2015 39 Unmet needs for participation in out-of-home activities. Moyle et al., 2011 40 Unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily life; companionship; meaningful relationships; and emotional support. Wilkins et al., 2022 41 Unmet needs for participation in out-of-home activities. Willis et al., 2020 34 Unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily life; and meaningful relationships. Moderate Morrisby et al., 2019 48 Unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily life; and meaningful relationships; respectful and dignified interactions; and emotional support. Dawson et al., 2023 36 Unmet social needs during pandemic. Severe Suwa et al., 2018 49 Unmet need for support to maintain independence in daily life; companionship; meaningful relationships; and emotional support. Open in a new tab Results suggest that in the mild stage, unmet social needs tend to focus on maintaining activities and roles that reinforce personal identity, such as volunteering or community participation. 39 , 41 Other unmet social needs observed include support for independence in daily life, companionship, meaningful relationships and emotional support. 34 , 40 As dementia progresses into the moderate stage, unmet social needs shift towards navigating increasing dependence and dealing with role changes. 36 , 48 Challenges related to acceptance from social networks emerge, along with more reliance on settings such as day centres, support groups, or home care services for social interactions. 36 , 48 Emotional support remains essential in this stage. 48 In the severe stage, changes in communication ability and reduced confidence in social settings further contributed to unmet needs for companionship, meaningful relationships and emotional support. 49 These findings highlight a shift from actively seeking social engagement and autonomy in mild stages to requiring more supportive social interactions in the moderate and severe stages. Beyond the life course trajectory of the older adult living with dementia, the family system's adaptation across the dementia stages also shapes unmet social needs. In the mild stages some families faced difficulties coming to terms with the condition, and even suspected the older adults to be “pretending” to forget. 34 , 40 In the severe stages, role strains manifested in different ways ranging from overprotecting them and inevitably restrict their autonomy, to exclude them from family events. 49 Families also experience their own unmet social needs, such as emotional support, respite and guidance from both informal networks and formal services. Stigma as a transversal influence on unmet social needs Stigma was identified as an embedded factor shaping how unmet social needs emerged and were experienced across dementia stages, diverse cultural and national contexts. Older adults living with dementia reported feeling stigmatized, misunderstood or excluded 37 , 40 , 48 , 49 ; as well as: ‘ignored by (healthcare) staff’, 54 ‘wanting their right to be heard’, 44 ‘negativity from family members’, 34 ‘overlooked or devalued’. 47 Studies reporting on stigma originated from diverse cultural contexts, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Norway, Pakistan and Japan, indicating that is a prevalent issue that transcends dementia stages and cultural contexts. Stigma was portrayed as a social experience that exacerbated unmet social needs. For instance, the fear of being judged or misunderstood led some individuals to withdraw from social interactions and hide their diagnosis, thereby further limiting opportunities for companionship, meaningful relationships and emotional support. This aligns with other literature showing that stigma towards dementia contributes to social exclusion, emotional withdrawal, reduced help-seeking and quality of relationships. 55 , 56 This pattern leads to a vicious cycle where stigma contributes to isolation, and isolation in turn worsens stigma. 57 , 58 Addressing stigma at the interpersonal, community and organizational socioecological levels is a necessary step in meeting the social needs of older people with dementia. Discussion This scoping review synthesised evidence on unmet social needs among community-living older adults with dementia, with attention to how these needs evolve across the dementia trajectory. Existing literature on social participation, social engagement, and psychosocial well-being in dementia has largely examined individual perspectives or interpersonal relationships as separate domains. This scoping review extends understanding by conceptualising unmet social needs as multidimensional and relational, shaped by dynamic interactions across individual, interpersonal, and community contexts. Applying a socioecological framework offers a multilevel perspective on how unmet social needs emerge, are shaped, and evolve. It underscores the importance of supports that spans the multiple levels rather than focusing on individual factors. Multi-level influences on unmet social needs While previous research has documented factors influencing social participation and engagement in dementia, it has generally examined these factors within a single domain, such as cognitive capabilities or caregiver characteristics, without considering how multiple levels interact to shape social experiences. Situating unmet social needs within a socioecological framework shifts the focus away from individual deficits toward modifiable relational, environmental, and structural influences. This perspective aligns with person-centred and rights-based approaches to dementia support, 59 which emphasise inclusion, participation, and social citizenship. From an intervention perspective, these findings suggest that targeting unmet social needs should extend beyond the individual to coordinate efforts across families, services, and communities. Figure 2 applies a socioecological lens to the unmet social needs reported in the scoping review, emphasizing their multilevel nature. Figure 2. Open in a new tab Unmet social needs across the socioecological levels. Implications for stage-responsive social support in dementia care Although dementia is clinically recognized as a progressive condition, research exploring the unmet social needs and participation of people living with dementia has rarely adopted a stage-sensitive perspective. This review highlights both the relevance of dementia stage in shaping unmet social needs and the limited empirical attention given to stage-specific experiences. Most included studies involved participants across multiple stages of dementia, which restricted detailed comparisons, underscoring a gap in the existing literature. Despite these limitations, the synthesis suggests patterns that align with frameworks describing social and identity changes in people living with dementia. As dementia evolves, there is a gradual transition from autonomy-oriented unmet social needs toward increasing reliance on supportive and inclusive social environments. These findings underscore the importance of regularly reassessing unmet social needs across the dementia trajectory, and recognizing the dynamic nature of preferences and capacities. Stage-responsive interventions may support continued engagement in meaningful activities and roles in earlier stages, while prioritising emotionally supportive, inclusive, and dignity-preserving social environments in later stages. Family coping as a contextual influence on unmet social needs While caregivers, relatives and family members play a central role in shaping the social environments and opportunities of people living with dementia, family coping has rarely been examined as a contextual influence on unmet social needs. Existing research indicates that primary caregiver and family characteristics and behaviours can influence social participation outcomes. 60 , 61 For example, partners of people living with dementia were considered as the most important social contact in reducing fear, and family members play key roles in initiating social activities. 60 Caregivers and family members who are socially active have been found to promote greater social participation among people living with dementia. 61 However, few studies explicitly explore how family adaptation, understanding, and coping processes shape the social experiences of people with dementia across stages. Findings from this review suggest that family dynamics are closely intertwined with unmet social needs. In earlier stages, difficulties in family understanding and acceptance of the diagnosis sometimes led to misinterpretation of symptoms and strained relationships. 38 In later stages, role strain manifested through overprotection or exclusion from family activities, inadvertently limiting autonomy and social inclusion. 49 These patterns reinforce the view that unmet social needs are not solely a consequence of cognitive decline, but are also shaped by evolving family relationships and adaptive processes over time. Literature has documented that caregiver needs and coping strategies vary across the stages of dementia, but are rarely examined in relation to the social participation and social needs of the person living with dementia. As a result, family coping is often treated as a static or background factor, limiting efforts to develop a more comprehensive understanding of unmet social needs. From an intervention perspective, these findings suggest that assessments and interventions aimed at addressing unmet social needs in dementia should incorporate caregiver, relatives and family coping and adaptation processes, recognising their potential to both support or constrain opportunities for social participation. Gaps in research Two main gaps were identified. First, scarcity of studies focusing on individuals in the moderate to severe stages of dementia. Including participants across all stages of dementia, in particular in the moderate and severe stage, is essential for developing a more comprehensive understanding of the unmet social needs experienced throughout the dementia journey. Second, greater diversity in participant characteristics is needed . There is a significant imbalance in geographical and socioeconomic representation of participants. For instance, there is a lack of research from countries with more family-oriented traditions such as in Southern Europe, where government and public policies support family-integrated approaches. 62 The majority of included studies originate from higher-income and developed countries and lack exploration of how factors like community infrastructure and access to services may differ between urban and rural areas. It is equally important to include minority groups, which includes but is not limited to people with an immigrant background, sexual and gender diverse individuals, and individuals of diverse cultural backgrounds and social contexts. These populations may experience exclusions that affect their ability to have their social needs met. By actively engaging participants with a wide range of backgrounds, identities and lived experiences, future research can better capture the complexity and diversity of unmet social needs among older adults with dementia. Limitations This scoping review has some limitations. First, it excluded studies published before year 2000, in languages other than English, Portuguese and Mandarin, and grey literature or reports from key organizations. However, independent screening by two reviewers and adherence to the JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines sought to reduce bias. Second, this review did not explicitly include the exploration of solutions to unmet social needs as a research question, which may have limited the identification of studies addressing such solutions. Third, differences in unmet social needs across dementia subtypes were not examined in this review as it was not a predefined objective. The lack of dementia subtype reporting and diagnostically mixed populations further limited the feasibility of subtype specific analysis. Nonetheless, existing literature on social and behavioural changes in neurodegenerative conditions suggests that unmet social needs may vary by diagnosis. The limited attention to dementia subtypes in research on social needs likely reflects a widely recognised methodological challenges in dementia research, including difficulties in recruiting sufficiently large and diagnostically homogeneous samples, overlapping symptom profiles, and the inclusion of participants across mixed disease stages. Addressing these challenges in future research may support the development of more diagnosis sensitive and stage responsive approaches to social support. Conclusion This scoping review identified the following categories of unmet social needs: (i) participation in out-of-home activities, (ii) support for maintaining independence in daily life (iii) companionship, (iv) meaningful relationships, (v) respectful and dignified social interactions, (vi) emotional support, and (vii) social needs during the pandemic. These needs evolve across dementia stages and are influenced by relational, socio-cultural, and structural contexts. The socioecological model provides a useful framework for understanding the multi-level factors that influence social needs. Future research should include a broader range of lived experiences, across all stages of dementia and reflecting diverse geographical, socioeconomic and cultural contexts. Greater inclusion of minority populations such as immigrants and sexual and gender diverse individuals is also essential. Strategies and approaches to addressing unmet social needs should be explored from the perspectives of older adults with dementia themselves. Supplemental Material sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261442966 - Supplemental material for Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261442966.docx (40.8KB, docx) Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261442966 for Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review by Sunny Tan, Marine Markaryan, Óscar Ribeiro, Rita Maldonado Branco and Liliana Sousa in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the transformative agreement of University of Aveiro with Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and B-On, supporting the publication of this article. Footnotes ORCID iD: Sunny Tan https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2152-465X Ethical considerations: As this study is a scoping review and did not involve data collection with participants, ethical approval was not required. Consent to participate: Not applicable Consent for publication: Not applicable Author contribution(s): Sunny Tan: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Methodology; Writing – original draft. Marine Markaryan: Data curation; Methodology. Óscar Ribeiro: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Methodology; Writing – review & editing. Rita Maldonado Branco: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Methodology; Writing – review & editing. Liliana Sousa: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Methodology; Writing – review & editing. Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the European Union's Horizon Europe under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions’ Doctoral Networks, HORIZON-MSCA-2021-DN-01–01, proposal number 101072827. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Data availability statement: Data are available upon request. Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online. References 1. World Health Organization. Decade of Healthy Ageing: Baseline Report. Summary. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021. [ Google Scholar ] 2. Bunt S, Steverink N, Olthof J, et al. Social frailty in older adults: a scoping review. Eur J Ageing 2017; 14: 323–334. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 3. Steverink N, Lindenberg S. Which social needs are important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging? Psychol Aging 2006; 21: 281–290. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 4. Hartigan I, Park G, Timmons S, et al. Policy Position Paper: Dementia and Loneliness. Dublin, Ireland: Alzheimer Society of Ireland, 2019. [ Google Scholar ] 5. Grand J, Casper S, MacDonald S. Clinical features and multidisciplinary approaches to dementia care. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011; 4: 125–147. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 6. World Health Organization. Dementia Key Facts, https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia (2023). 7. Warren A. Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia as a means of communication: considerations for reducing stigma and promoting person-centered care. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 875246. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 8. Feast A, Moniz-Cook E, Stoner C, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD) and caregiver well-being. Int Psychogeriatr 2016; 28: 1761–1774. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 9. Carvacho R, Carrasco M, Lorca MBF, et al. Met and unmet needs of dependent older people according to the camberwell assessment of need for the elderly (CANE): a scoping review. Rev Espanola Geriatr Gerontol 2021; 56: 225–235. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 10. World Health Organization. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Dementia. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) , https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3A%2F%2Fid.who.int%2Ficd%2Fentity%2F546689346 (2023). 11. Costa S, Sousa L, Luz H, et al. Daily mobility and social interactions among community-dwelling older adults with pet dogs: a scoping review. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41: 2609–2623. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 12. Van Aerschot L, Kadi S, Rodrigues R, et al. Community-dwelling older adults and their informal carers call for more attention to psychosocial needs – interview study on unmet care needs in three European countries. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2022; 101: 104672. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 13. Miranda-Castillo C, Woods B, Galboda K, et al. Unmet needs, quality of life and support networks of people with dementia living at home. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8: 132. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 14. Black BS, Johnston D, Rabins PV, et al. Unmet needs of community-residing persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: findings from the maximizing independence at home study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61: 2087–2095. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 15. Black BS, Johnston D, Leoutsakos J, et al. Unmet needs in community-living persons with dementia are common, often non-medical and related to patient and caregiver characteristics. Int Psychogeriatr 2019; 31: 1643–1654. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 16. Mazurek J, Szcześniak D, Urbańska K, et al. Met and unmet care needs of older people with dementia living at home: personal and informal carers’ perspectives. Dementia (London) 2019; 18: 1963–1975. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 17. Janssen N, Handels RL, Sköldunger A, et al. Impact of untimely access to formal care on costs and quality of life in community dwelling people with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 66: 1165–1174. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 18. Miranda-Castillo C, Woods B, Orrell M. The needs of people with dementia living at home from user, caregiver and professional perspectives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 43. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 19. Morrisby C, Joosten A, Ciccarelli M. Do services meet the needs of people with dementia and carers living in the community? A scoping review of the international literature. Int Psychogeriatr 2018; 30: 5–14. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 20. Curnow E, Rush R, Maciver D, et al. Exploring the needs of people with dementia living at home reported by people with dementia and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25: 397–407. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 21. Monin JK, Jorgensen TD, MacNeil Vroomen JL. Self-reports and caregivers’ proxy reports of unmet needs of persons with dementia: implications for both partners’ health-related quality of life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 28: 363–367. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 22. Janssen N, Handels RL, Köhler S, et al. Profiles of met and unmet needs in people with dementia according to caregivers’ perspective: results from a European multicenter study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21: 1609–1616.e1. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 23. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18: 2119–2126. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 24. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169: 467–473. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 25. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13: 141–146. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 26. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18: 143. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 27. van der Roest HG, Meiland FJM, Comijs HC, et al. What do community-dwelling people with dementia need? A survey of those who are known to care and welfare services. Int Psychogeriatr 2009; 21: 949–965. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 28. Mak S, Thomas A. Steps for conducting a scoping review. J Grad Med Educ 2022; 14: 565–567. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 29. Kalánková D, Stolt M, Scott PA, et al. Unmet care needs of older people: a scoping review. Nurs Ethics 2021; 28: 149–178. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 30. Raivio M, Eloniemi-Sulkava U, Laakkonen M-L, et al. How do officially organized services meet the needs of elderly caregivers and their spouses with Alzheimer’s disease? Am J Alzheimers Dis Demen 2007; 22: 360–368. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 31. Cohen-Mansfield J, Dakheel-Ali M, Marx MS, et al. Which unmet needs contribute to behavior problems in persons with advanced dementia? Psychiatry Res 2015; 228: 59–64. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 32. Gaugler JE, Kane RL, Kane RA, et al. Unmet care needs and key outcomes in dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 2098–2105. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 33. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Los Angeles: Sage, 2022. [ Google Scholar ] 34. Willis R, Zaidi A, Balouch S, et al. Experiences of people with dementia in Pakistan: help-seeking, understanding, stigma, and religion. Gerontologist 2020; 60: 145–154. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 35. Clare L, Martyr A, Gamble LD, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on ‘living well’ with mild-to-moderate dementia in the community: findings from the IDEAL cohort. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 85: 921–936. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 36. Dawson E, Collins R, Pentecost C, et al. Navigating the coronavirus pandemic 2 years on: experiences of people with dementia from the British IDEAL cohort. Dementia (London) 2023; 22: 760–782. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 37. Darlington N, Arthur A, Woodward M, et al. A survey of the experience of living with dementia in a dementia-friendly community. Dementia (London) 2021; 20: 1711–1722. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 38. Stapley S, Pentecost C, Hillman A, et al. Continuity, change and ‘living well’ for older people with dementia: longitudinal qualitative findings from the IDEAL cohort study. Ageing Soc 2025; 45: 2187–2206. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 39. Flatt JD, Liptak A, Oakley MA, et al. Subjective experiences of an art museum engagement activity for persons with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and their family caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2015; 30: 380–389. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 40. Moyle W, Kellett U, Ballantyne A, et al. Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 1445–1453. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 41. Wilkins JM, Locascio JJ, Gunther JM, et al. Predictors of the importance of everyday preferences for older adults with cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 2022; 34: 287–294. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 42. Van’t Leven N, de Lange J, Prick A-E, et al. How do activating interventions fit the personal needs, characteristics and preferences of people with dementia living in the community and their informal caregivers? Dementia (London) 2019; 18: 157–177. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 43. Brittain K, Corner L, Robinson L, et al. Ageing in place and technologies of place: the lived experience of people with dementia in changing social, physical and technological environments. Sociol Health Illn 2010; 32: 272–287. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 44. Eades M, Lord K, Cooper C. Festival in a box’: development and qualitative evaluation of an outreach programme to engage socially isolated people with dementia. Dementia 2018; 17: 896–908. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 45. Manson A, Ciro C, Williams KN, et al. Identity and perceptions of quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease. Appl Nurs Res 2020; 52: 151225. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 46. Strandenæs MG, Lund A, Rokstad AMM. Experiences of attending day care services designed for people with dementia–a qualitative study with individual interviews. Aging Ment Health 2018; 22: 764–772. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 47. Tranvåg O, Petersen KA, Nåden D. Relational interactions preserving dignity experience: perceptions of persons living with dementia. Nurs Ethics 2015; 22: 577–593. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 48. Morrisby C, Joosten A, Ciccarelli M. Needs of people with dementia and their spousal carers: a study of those living in the community. Australas J Ageing 2019; 38: e43–e49. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 49. Suwa S, Otani S, Tsujimura M, et al. The diary of a nonagenarian-centenarian woman with dementia: memory loss, life changes, and community care in Japan. Int J Nurs Pract 2018; 24: e12655. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 50. Dickins M, Goeman D, O’Keefe F, et al. Understanding the conceptualisation of risk in the context of community dementia care. Soc Sci Med 2018; 208: 72–79. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 51. Eichler T, René Thyrian J, Hertel J, et al. Unmet needs of community-dwelling primary care patients with dementia in Germany: prevalence and correlates. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 51: 847–855. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 52. Hicks B, Innes A, Nyman SR. Exploring the ‘active mechanisms’ for engaging rural-dwelling older men with dementia in a community technological initiative. Ageing Soc 2020; 40: 1906–1938. [ Google Scholar ] 53. Svanström R, Sundler AJ. Gradually losing one’s foothold – A fragmented existence when living alone with dementia. Dementia (London) 2015; 14: 145–163. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 54. Chung P. Experiences of older people with dementia: homecare enablement to support transitions in daily life at home. Br J Occup Ther 2019; 82: 716–725. [ Google Scholar ] 55. Brigiano M, Calabrese L, Chirico I, et al. Within my walls, i escape being underestimated: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of stigma and help-seeking in dementia. Behav Sci 2025; 15: 774. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 56. Patterson KM, Clarke C, Wolverson EL, et al. Through the eyes of others – the social experiences of people with dementia: a systematic literature review and synthesis. Int Psychogeriatr 2018; 30: 791–805. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 57. Burgener SC, Buckwalter K, Perkhounkova Y, et al. The effects of perceived stigma on quality of life outcomes in persons with early-stage dementia: longitudinal findings: part 2. Dementia (London) 2015; 14: 609–632. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 58. Cohen-Mansfield J. The association between loneliness, social isolation and dementia – what does it mean? Int Psychogeriatr 2025; 37: 100003. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 59. Smith SK, Wolverson EL, Mountain GA. What is intended by the term “participation” and what does it mean to people living with dementia? A conceptual overview and directions for future research. Front Rehabil Sci 2022; 3: 952722. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 60. Knecht HL, Rodriguez FS. Social environment of people living with dementia: characteristics, facilitators and barriers. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20: e087923. [ Google Scholar ] 61. Palaza A, Bouldin ED, Miyawaki CE, et al. Characteristics of informal caregivers and social participation of people with dementia. Gerontologist 2024; 64: gnae096. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 62. Lillo-Crespo M, Riquelme J, Macrae R, et al. Experiences of advanced dementia care in seven European countries: implications for educating the workforce. Glob Health Action 2018; 11: 1478686. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] Associated Data This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article. Supplementary Materials sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261442966 - Supplemental material for Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261442966.docx (40.8KB, docx) Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261442966 for Unmet social needs of community-living older adults with dementia: A scoping review by Sunny Tan, Marine Markaryan, Óscar Ribeiro, Rita Maldonado Branco and Liliana Sousa in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Articles from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications ACTIONS View on publisher site PDF (699.9 KB) Cite Collections Permalink RESOURCES Similar articles Cited by other articles Links to NCBI Databases Follow NCBI NCBI on X (formerly known as Twitter) NCBI on Facebook NCBI on LinkedIn NCBI on GitHub NCBI RSS feed Connect with NLM NLM on X (formerly known as Twitter) NLM on Facebook NLM on YouTube National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers NLM NIH HHS USA.gov Back to Top

Related documents

• A scoping review of dementia education programs for Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, and Vietnamese communities.#165854
• Protocol of a dyadic, app-supported collaborative care intervention trial for informal caregivers of people living with dementia-the multi-center living@home study.#1098
• Systematic scoping review and ethical analysis of digital health interventions for dementia and cognitive decline#624441
• Effectiveness of Supporting Informal Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-Randomized Controlled Trials#383903
• The Use of Mental Capacity and Mental Health Laws in the Care of People Living With Dementia in Residential and Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature.#9529