Smartphone Step Data for Public Health: Insights From Surveillance in Japan and Future Perspectives.
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
Smartphone Step Data for Public Health: Insights From Surveillance in Japan and Future Perspectives - PMC Skip to main content An official website of the United States government Here's how you know Here's how you know Search Log in Primary site navigation Search Log in Search PMC Full-Text Archive Search in PMC Journal List User Guide As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice editorial J Epidemiol . 2026 Jun 5;36(6):177–178. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20260059 Smartphone Step Data for Public Health: Insights From Surveillance in Japan and Future Perspectives Takashi Nakagata 1, 2 , Yoshio Nakata 3 Author information Article notes Copyright and License information 1 Center for Physical Activity Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan 2 Microbial Research Center for Health and Medicine, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan 3 Institute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan ✉ Address for correspondence. Takashi Nakagata, PhD, Center for Physical Activity Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Kento Innovation Park, NK Building, 3-17 Senrioka Shinmachi, Settsu-shi, Osaka 566-0002, Japan (e-mail: nakagata@nibn.go.jp , takashi.nakagata@gmail.com ). Received 2026 Feb 4; Accepted 2026 Feb 11; Prepublished 2026 Apr 30; Collection date 2026. © 2026 Takashi Nakagata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. PMC Copyright notice PMCID: PMC13158351 PMID: 42055711 Daily step count is an intuitive and widely understood indicator of physical activity. 1 As wearable devices and smartphones have proliferated, step-based evidence has expanded, including dose–response meta-analyses linking daily steps to multiple health outcomes. 2 In Japan, population monitoring of step counts has a long history: pedometer-based steps have been assessed in the National Health and Nutrition Survey since 1989. 3 , 4 The Physical Activity Guide for Health Promotion 2023 provides step-count figures (8,000 steps/day for adults and 6,000 for older adults) as individual-level reference. 5 To effectively promote physical activity, it is essential to identify specific periods throughout the day—from waking to bedtime—during which additional activity can be incorporated, and to establish concrete behavioral targets accordingly. In this context, Matsumoto et al report a timely nationwide longitudinal analysis of smartphone-measured steps in Japan that benchmarks changes during and after the April–May 2020 emergency declaration against a 2019 baseline. 6 By resolving hour-by-hour patterns, the study moves the field beyond daily aggregates and clarifies when deficits were most pronounced—weekday commuting periods and late evening—helping to inform time-targeted public health strategies. The direction and magnitude of step decline have been reported consistently in Japan (eg, municipal-level changes in Yokohama, 7 occupational shifts, 8 and regional/demographic heterogeneity 9 ). Matsumoto et al extended this to a national diurnal lens that clarified which periods of the day drive aggregate change. The “valleys” appear consistent with exogenous structural constraints (reduced on-site work, curtailed evening venues), not autonomous behavior change alone. Although a causal inference lies outside the descriptive scope, the internal consistency across strata reinforces these structural explanations. Matsumoto et al provide an example of descriptive epidemiology, 10 combining the classic person–place–time framework with an unusually high temporal resolution. By resolving diurnal patterns across demographic groups (person) and urban contexts (place) over specific pandemic phases (time), it yields actionable insights into when and where to intervene. From a methodological perspective, diurnal metrics merit attention. Changes in the timing, amplitude, and regularity of daily step profiles offer sensitive indicators of disruption and recovery, which are obscured when relying on daily totals. The larger declines among younger adults highlight differential constraints and preferences. Time- and place-targeted measures—such as commuter-hour prompts, improvements in evening walkability and lighting, and facilitation of venue access—may be particularly useful because they align with the times of day when deficits are greatest. This perspective aligns with Japan’s Active Guide, 11 which encourages people to add 10 min of activity per day and reduce prolonged sitting. The Guide’s timeline-style framing, illustrating options during morning, midday, and evening and across three domains (lifestyle activity, exercise, and breaking up sitting), offers context-specific examples (eg, walking a child to school, active commuting, short movement breaks at work, or light exercises while watching TV). Such approaches should be paired with subgroup-sensitive messaging considering age, urbanicity, and socioeconomic and occupational characteristics. From a surveillance perspective, such data streams complement established systems by offering near-real-time, high-frequency indicators. Device-derived measures provide scale, speed, and temporal granularity, which are valuable for routine policy evaluation and rapid situational awareness during crises. A recent country-wide natural experiment using smartphone step data (∼2.1 million users) reported that relocating from less- to more-walkable cities was associated with higher daily step counts (by ∼1,100 steps/day on average), sustained over months and consistent across strata of sex, age, and body mass index. 12 The All of Us Research Program, using Fitbit wearable data, documented pronounced “activity inequality” by sex, age, body size, geography, and built environment, strongly correlated with obesity prevalence. 13 Longitudinal analyses from All of Us showed that step-count volumes derived from participants’ own Fitbit devices are associated with incident chronic diseases across the phenome, with largely inverse associations for several outcomes and nonlinear patterns for diabetes and hypertension that show little additional association above ∼8,000–9,000 steps/day. 14 Additional work from the same program suggests that novel wearable-derived metrics—such as daily heart rate per step—may show stronger associations with cardiovascular fitness and cardiovascular disease outcomes than steps alone. 15 These results highlight the public health relevance and clinical potential of device-derived indicators at the national level. As Matsumoto et al noted in their limitations, representativeness and the effect of periods when smartphones are carried versus not carried warrant attention; underestimation or overestimation due to non-carriage is well-documented. 16 The authors appropriately discussed potential confounding by meteorological factors and limited generalizability from an app-based, self-selected user population. Cross-device calibration and algorithmic heterogeneity compromise comparability across platforms and times. Transparent reporting of device and operating system distributions, plausibility filters, calibration and sensitivity analyses, and cross-validation with traditional surveillance should become standard practices. Matsumoto et al add an important piece to Japan’s coronavirus disease 2019 physical activity evidence base: not only that steps fell, but also when they fell and how incompletely they returned. Their diurnal signature supports time-targeted, place-aware countermeasures—such as commuter-hour messaging and improvements to evening environments—prioritized for subgroups most affected. The study also strengthens the case for incorporating device-based monitoring into routine surveillance. At the national level, integrating diurnal, device-derived indicators into Japan’s existing surveillance architecture—alongside questionnaire-based surveys and periodic accelerometer subsamples—could help provide a more responsive and resilient monitoring system. Establishing regional, hour-by-hour dashboards may be a useful future policy priority to link routine evaluation with rapid situational awareness. Combined with established governmental surveys and research-grade accelerometry, such systems could enhance Japan’s preparedness for future public health shocks. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding: This editorial article did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Author contributions: Nakagata Takashi wrote the draft of the article and approved the final manuscript. Nakata Yoshio contributed to the draft revision, initiated the conception of the article, and approved the final version. Ethical considerations: An ethics review was deemed unnecessary because this editorial article was based solely on published information and did not include identifiable individual-level data. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process: During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT-5.2 (OpenAI) to improve the grammar, phrasing, and readability of the English text. After using this tool, the authors carefully reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article. English language editing: We would like to express our gratitude to Editage ( www.editage.jp ) for their assistance with English language editing. Conflicts of interest: None declared. REFERENCES 1. Paluch AE, Matthews CE, Doherty A, et al. Daily steps as a public health metric for physical activity monitoring and promotion. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2026;54:15–25. 10.1249/JES.0000000000000375 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 2. Ding D, Nguyen B, Nau T, et al. Daily steps and health outcomes in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2025;10:e668–e681. 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00164-1 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 3. Inoue S, Ohya Y, Tudor-Locke C, Tanaka S, Yoshiike N, Shimomitsu T. Time trends for step-determined physical activity among Japanese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1913–1919. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821a5225 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 4. Nakagata T, Ono R. Data resource profile: Exercise habits, step counts, and sedentary behavior from the National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan. Data Brief. 2024;53:110103. 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110103 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 5. Physical Activity Guide for health promotion 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001495670.pdf . Accessed 23.01.2026. 6. Matsumoto N, Kamada M, Hayashi H, Kondo N, Kawachi I. Longitudinal study of changes in daily and hourly steps during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2026;36(6):179–187. 10.2188/jea.JE20250328 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 7. Hino K, Asami Y. Change in walking steps and association with built environments during the COVID-19 state of emergency: a longitudinal comparison with the first half of 2019 in Yokohama, Japan. Health Place. 2021;69:102544. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102544 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 8. Fujii Y, Kitano N, Kai Y, Jindo T, Arao T. Changes in accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary behavior from before to after COVID-19 outbreak in workers. J Epidemiol. 2024;34(5):247–253. 10.2188/jea.JE20230023 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 9. Yamada Y, Yoshida T, Nakagata T, Nanri H, Miyachi M. Age, sex, and regional differences in the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on objective physical activity in Japan: a 2-year nationwide longitudinal study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(8):1032–1033. 10.1007/s12603-021-1662-y [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 10. Lesko CR, Fox MP, Edwards JK. A framework for descriptive epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191:2063–2070. 10.1093/aje/kwac115 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 11. Physical activity guidelines for health promotion (Active Guide). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001361383.pdf . Accessed 23.01.2026. 12. Althoff T, Ivanovic B, King AC, Hicks JL, Delp SL, Leskovec J. Countrywide natural experiment links built environment to physical activity. Nature. 2025;645:407–413. 10.1038/s41586-025-09321-3 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 13. Jeong H, Roghanizad AR, Master H, et al. Data from the All of Us Research Program reinforces existence of activity inequality. npj Digit Med. 2025;8:8. 10.1038/s41746-024-01358-4 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 14. Master H, Annis J, Huang S, et al. Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program. Nat Med. 2022;28:2301–2308. 10.1038/s41591-022-02012-w [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 15. Chen Z, Wang CT, Hu CJ, Ward K, Kho A, Webster G. Daily heart rate per step: a wearables metric associated with cardiovascular disease in a cross-sectional study of the All of Us Research Program. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14:e036801. 10.1161/JAHA.124.036801 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 16. Amagasa S, Kamada M, Sasai H, et al. How well iPhones measure steps in free-living conditions: Cross-sectional validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7:e10418. 10.2196/10418 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association ACTIONS View on publisher site PDF (172.1 KB) Cite Collections Permalink RESOURCES Similar articles Cited by other articles Links to NCBI Databases Follow NCBI NCBI on X (formerly known as Twitter) NCBI on Facebook NCBI on LinkedIn NCBI on GitHub NCBI RSS feed Connect with NLM NLM on X (formerly known as Twitter) NLM on Facebook NLM on YouTube National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers NLM NIH HHS USA.gov Back to Top
Related documents
- Balancing Self-Tracking and Surveillance: Legal, Ethical and Technological Issues in Using Smartphones to Monitor Communication in People with Health Conditions.#285507
- Evaluating Consumer m-Health Services for User Engagement and Health Promotion: An Organizational Field Experiment#1112718
- Current status and actions needed for disseminating medical information to the public at National Centers in Japan.#625984
- Promoting mobile health#1653
- Criterion Validity of a Consumer Wearable for Step Counting and Activity Intensity Classification in Adults With Lung Cancer: Laboratory-Based Validation Study.#452992
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive