Zenodo (CERN)
open access
CC BY 4.0
Accuracy Paradox: Addressing Epistemic, Manipulative, and Societal Risks of Hallucination in AI Governance
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Architecture to Output: Structural Origins of Hallucination in Large Language Models and the Amplifying Role of Data#971818
- Legibility Is Not Coherence: Why Large Systems Systematically Confuse Compliance for Moral and Epistemic Integrity#715455
- Beyond Correction: Epistemic Safety as a Mediator for Policy Transfer in Large Language Models#105624
- Is the Algorithm an Epistemic Agent? A Critical Analysis of Computational Epistemology and the Emergence of Algorithmic Agency#688789
- Algorithmic Political Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems#292722
Record · ID 264338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive