Prevalence and Severity of Self-Assessed Hallux Valgus in Community-Dwelling Older South African and Flemish Individuals.
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
Prevalence and Severity of Self‐Assessed Hallux Valgus in Community‐Dwelling Older South African and Flemish Individuals - PMC Skip to main content An official website of the United States government Here's how you know Here's how you know Search Log in Primary site navigation Search Log in Search PMC Full-Text Archive Search in PMC Journal List User Guide As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice J Foot Ankle Res . 2026 Jun 2;19(2):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70173 Prevalence and Severity of Self‐Assessed Hallux Valgus in Community‐Dwelling Older South African and Flemish Individuals Marise Carina Breet 1, 2, ✉ , Benedicte Vanwanseele 1 , Hylton B Menz 3 , Tonya M Esterhuizen 4 , Ranel Venter 2 Author information Article notes Copyright and License information 1 Human Movement Biomechanics, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 2 Department of Exercise, Sport, and Lifestyle Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa 3 Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 4 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa * Correspondence: Marise Carina Breet, ( marise@mbio.co.za ) ✉ Corresponding author. Revised 2026 May 20; Received 2026 Mar 11; Accepted 2026 May 28; Collection date 2026 Jun. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of Foot and Ankle Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Podiatry Association and The Royal College of Podiatry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. PMC Copyright notice PMCID: PMC13240344 PMID: 42231049 ABSTRACT Introduction Hallux valgus (HV) is a common foot deformity in older adults, frequently associated with pain and functional impairment. Global prevalence is estimated at 19%, although it varies by continent; consequently, there is a notable knowledge gap concerning its prevalence and severity in older populations of South Africa and Belgium. This study aimed to compare HV prevalence and severity, report on footwear habits within these cohorts, and examine associations with sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Methods This observational cross‐sectional study recruited 300 community‐dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years from Flanders, Belgium ( n = 145) and the Western Cape, South Africa ( n = 155). Demographic data, footwear habits, and HV self‐assessment scores (using the Manchester scale) were collected via an online questionnaire. Associations between HV and other variables were examined using chi‐square tests. Results HV prevalence was 27.6% in the Flemish cohort and 31.6% in the South African cohort. Although South Africans reported more frequent barefootedness, HV prevalence rates remained similar. HV prevalence was significantly higher in females (35.4%) compared to males (17.0%). Furthermore, prevalence and severity increased with age but were inversely associated with BMI. Conclusion HV prevalence is similar in older South African and Flemish individuals, despite differing footwear habits, supporting the multifactorial nature of HV formation. These findings emphasize the need for region‐specific data and clinical strategies to address HV in older populations. Keywords: footwear habits, hallux valgus, older population, prevalence, severity 1. Introduction Hallux valgus (HV) is a common foot deformity frequently observed in older adults. HV is characterized by a three‐dimensional deformity involving the lateral deviation of the great toe, medial deviation of the first metatarsal, and progressive subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint [ 1 ]. HV is associated with pain [ 2 ], reduced general and foot health‐related quality of life [ 3 ], impaired physical function [ 4 ], gait instability [ 5 ], and an increased risk of falls [ 6 ]. Initial HV treatment typically involves non‐surgical approaches, with practitioners primarily relying on their clinical knowledge and expertise due to limited empirical evidence [ 7 ]. While surgical intervention may improve pain and provide a slight enhancement in function, these benefits are often overshadowed by potential surgical complications [ 8 ]. The pooled recurrence rate of 25% following HV surgery highlights the importance of prevention and early intervention [ 9 ]. A 2023 systematic review estimated the global HV prevalence at 19%, with 23% in women and 11% in men [ 9 ]. HV prevalence varies by continent, with the highest rates observed in Oceania (29%), Asia (22%), and Europe (18%) and the lowest in Africa (3%) [ 9 ]. While studies across regions have demonstrated varying HV prevalence, no peer‐reviewed research has examined HV prevalence and severity in older South African and Flemish populations to date. Understanding the interplay between the intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with HV development and progression could answer questions regarding these varying prevalence rates and influence the development of effective treatment strategies. Intrinsic factors, such as female sex [ 10 ], genetics [ 11 ], and increased age [ 12 ], contribute to HV prevalence and severity. However, an increased BMI is inversely associated with HV risk [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Extrinsic risk factors include footwear that is too short [ 16 , 17 ], narrow [ 12 , 18 ], or has an elevated heel [ 19 ]. Early life footwear exposure may influence foot morphology and potentially lead to foot deformities later in life [ 16 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Limited recent data on shoe‐wearing patterns exist for older populations in South Africa and Flanders [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 ]. South Africa exhibits a “barefoot culture” with 90.9% of children habitually barefoot and demonstrating differences in foot morphology compared to German children [ 26 ]. Research has primarily focused on footwear fit and wearing patterns, and preschool children are often encouraged to attend school barefoot rather than wearing footwear [ 16 , 17 , 27 ]. However, South African school uniform regulations require children to wear footwear based on European data [ 28 ]. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared HV prevalence and severity and the potential influence of footwear habits in Flanders, Belgium, and Western Cape, South Africa. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and severity of HV deformity and describe footwear habits among community‐dwelling older adults in Western Cape, South Africa, and Flanders, Belgium. Furthermore, this study examined the associations between age, sex, BMI, and HV prevalence and severity to explore intercontinental differences and factors associated with HV deformities. 2. Methods This observational cross‐sectional study estimated the prevalence and severity of HV in older individuals in Flanders, Belgium, and the Western Cape Metropole, South Africa. A convenience sampling approach recruited community‐dwelling older men and women who voluntarily responded to invitations distributed via flyers, letters, and senior organizations in Leuven, Belgium, and the Western Cape, South Africa. Participants completed an online questionnaire between February 2024 and June 2025. Eligible participants were residents of Flanders, Belgium, or the Western Cape, South Africa, aged ≥ 60 years, and able to stand independently. Individuals with lower limb amputations, blindness, or cognitive impairment that precluded the completion of the questionnaire were excluded. This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (protocol no. S23/07/150 (PhD)), KU Leuven's Privacy and Ethics platform (PRET), and the Social and Societal Ethics Committee (SMEC) of KU Leuven (protocol no. G‐2024‐7981‐R3 (AMD)). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Data were collected using online questionnaires hosted on the SunSurvey and LimeSurvey platforms. Participants voluntarily accessed the questionnaires via a smartphone using a QR code on flyers, newsletters, or invitation emails from various senior organizations. Questionnaires were available in Afrikaans, English, Xhosa, and Flemish. Participants provided informed consent before completing a questionnaire that recorded their age, weight, height, sex, and footwear habits. BMI classification was based on the optimal functional capacity of older adults, encompassing the following categories: underweight (< 25 kg/m 2 ), ideal weight (25–35 kg/m 2 ), and overweight (> 35 kg/m 2 ) [ 29 ]. Footwear habits were recorded using a 10‐item questionnaire adapted from Hollander et al. [ 30 ], which assessed the frequency of barefoot versus shod activity throughout the participants' lifespans on a continuous scale. Higher total scores indicated more time spent wearing shoes, whereas lower scores indicated more time spent barefoot. Hallux valgus self‐assessment was performed using the Manchester scale, which comprises standardized images of the left and right feet. The Manchester scale is a validated, standardized, non‐invasive instrument commonly used for HV deformity classification based on the visual assessment of the external angular alignment relative to the first metatarsal and does not include radiographic or clinical assessment of the joint structure [ 31 ]. Self‐assessment using the Manchester scale has demonstrated high test‐retest reliability and acceptable agreement with examiner ratings [ 32 ]. Images were categorized as representing no deformity (score = 0), mild deformity (score = 1), moderate deformity (score = 2), or severe deformity (score = 3). Grades 2 and 3 were considered indicative of hallux valgus deformity, with different grades reflecting varying degrees of severity. To analyze HV severity, both feet of each participant were assessed, resulting in nine possible bilateral severity combinations. For participants with asymmetrical severity, the foot with the highest severity was used for the analysis. This approach allowed nine scenarios to be collapsed into four categories (none, mild, moderate, and severe) for descriptive analyses. The required sample size for estimating prevalence was calculated using a formula for a single population proportion: n = Z 2 x p ( 1 − p ) d 2 . A Z ‐value of 1.96 was used for a 95% confidence interval ( α = 0.05). Prevalence estimates were derived from previous literature, which reported an overall HV risk of 13% in males and 30% in older women. Accordingly, proportions of 0.13 (males) and 0.30 (females) were used [ 33 ]. The d value was set at 0.05, corresponding to a total confidence interval width of 10%, as recommended by Charan and Biswas (2013) [ 34 ]. For between‐population comparisons, a sample size of 200 participants per group was estimated to provide 80% power to detect a 10% difference in proportions at a two‐sided significance level of 0.05. Owing to recruitment constraints, the final sample comprised 145 Flemish and 155 South African participants, which was slightly fewer than our original sample size estimation. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 30.0). Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables as percentages. Associations between HV prevalence and age group, sex, and BMI category were examined using chi‐square tests. Between‐cohort differences in HV prevalence, severity, footwear habits, and associated factors were assessed by stratified analyses using chi‐squared tests for categorical variables and independent‐samples t‐tests for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. 3. Results This study included 300 participants, comprising 94 men and 206 women. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study population. Footwear habit scores represent the average time spent barefoot or shod throughout an individual's lifespan, with higher scores indicating a greater time spent wearing footwear. HV prevalence refers to the incidence of HV on either the left or right foot, graded as moderate (grade 2) or severe (grade 3). As shown in Table 1 , the HV prevalence in Flanders, Belgium and the Western Cape, South Africa cohorts was 27.6% and 31.6%, respectively, with similar percentages observed for mild, moderate, and severe cases. There was no statistical difference between the cohorts in terms of prevalence or severity ( p = 0.445 and p = 0.244). TABLE 1. Demographics, HV prevalence and HV severity according to cohort. Flemish n = 145 South African n = 155 Sex n (%) Male 57 (39.3) 37 (23.9) Female 88 (60.7) 118 (76.1) Age mean (SD), y 71.4 (7.4) 72.7 (8.0) BMI mean (SD), kg/m 2 25.4 (4.2) 27.7 (5.1) Foot dominance n (%) Right 106 (73.1) 124 (80.0) Left 39 (26.9) 31 (20) Footwear habits score out of 10 median (IQR) 10 (10–10) 8 (6–9) HV prevalence It Left and right foot 40 (27.6) [95% CI 20.7%–35.7%] 49 (31.6) [95% CI 24.5%–39.6%] HV severity n (%) None (Grade 0) 46 (31.7) 47 (30.3) Mild (Grade 1) 59 (40.7) 59 (38.2) Moderate (Grade 2) 24 (16.6) 35 (22.5) Severe (Grade 3) 16 (11.0) 14 (9.0) Open in a new tab Figure 1 shows that footwear habits differ significantly between cohorts across life stages. The Flemish cohort spent less time barefoot, whereas the South African cohort spent more time barefoot during childhood, young adulthood, middle age, and old age, particularly in settings where barefoot walking is customary, such as at home. FIGURE 1. Open in a new tab Distribution of barefootedness across life stages of both cohorts based on the barefoot questionnaire. 3.1. Factors Associated With HV Prevalence The associations between HV prevalence by cohort and sex, age, and BMI are shown in Figure 2 . As shown in Figure 2 , sex differences significantly affected HV prevalence ( p = 0.001) in the combined Flemish and South African cohorts. Overall, males had an HV prevalence of 17%, whereas females had a prevalence of 35%. Within male and female participants, there were no differences between the cohorts in terms of HV prevalence ( p = 0.339 and 0.810, respectively). There was no overall association between age group and HV prevalence in the combined cohorts ( p = 0.053). When stratified by age group, a significant difference ( p = 0.009) in HV deformity prevalence was observed only in participants aged > 80 years between the Flemish (15%) and South African (52%) cohorts. HV prevalence declined non‐significantly with increasing BMI ( p = 0.213) overall, and there was no difference between cohorts within BMI categories, although the overweight Flemish cohort had no HV cases. FIGURE 2. Open in a new tab HV prevalence according to sex, age, and BMI. 3.2. Factors Associated With HV Severity HV severity categories of none (grade 0), mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), and severe (grade 3) exhibited similar percentages in both cohorts (Table 1 ). The prevalence of HV severity stratified by sex, age, and body mass index is illustrated in Figure 3 . Both the Flemish and South African men had the highest prevalence of no HV, at 47% and 54%, respectively. Conversely, Flemish and South African women exhibited the highest prevalence of mild HV (42%). Furthermore, females from both cohorts had a higher prevalence of moderate and severe HV than males. FIGURE 3. Open in a new tab Prevalence of HV severity per cohort according to sex, age, and BMI. Age groups 60–64 and 65–69 years presented with a high prevalence of no or mild HV cases in both cohorts. An increase in HV severity to moderate and severe HV was correlated with increasing age for both cohorts, except for the Flemish 80+ age group, which presented with a lower prevalence of moderate and severe HV. In both cohorts, underweight participants exhibited the highest prevalence of moderate and severe HV, whereas overweight participants demonstrated the highest percentages of no and mild HV. South Africans reported the highest prevalence of mild HV cases in the ideal weight category. Notably, no moderate or severe HV cases occurred in the overweight group from the Flemish cohort, and no severe HV cases were identified in the South African cohort. 4. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study that compared HV prevalence, HV severity, and footwear habits among community‐dwelling older men and women from the Western Cape, South Africa, and Flanders, Belgium, and investigated their associations with sex, age, and BMI. The HV prevalence and severity in both cohorts differed from previously reported percentages in Europe and Africa [ 9 ]. Footwear habits varied significantly across cohorts; South African participants reported spending more time barefoot during childhood, young adulthood, middle age, and old age than Flemish participants. An unexpected finding was that, despite more barefoot exposure in the South African cohort, HV prevalence remained similar despite Flemish adults spending more time in footwear throughout their lives, which contrasts with previous research [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. HV prevalence and severity were higher in women and older individuals. Consistent with previous studies, BMI had an inverse effect on HV prevalence and severity [ 14 ]. The Flemish and South African cohorts showed HV prevalence rates of 27.6% and 31.6%, respectively, compared to a global prevalence of 19% [ 9 ]. The pooled global prevalence of 35.7% in individuals aged ≥ 60 years is consistent with these findings [ 33 ]. Country‐specific data indicated that Europe accounted for 18.35% and Africa for 3% in HV prevalence [ 9 ]. To our knowledge, no region‐specific research has examined HV prevalence in Flanders, Belgium, or the Western Cape, South Africa. The prevalence of HV in Flanders exceeds the pooled European prevalence, while the African data contrast significantly with the South African findings. This discrepancy may be attributable to the underrepresentation of HV prevalence data in certain European and African regions. Recent research reported an HV prevalence of 13.6% in Nigeria, which is lower than that observed in the South African cohort. The HV rates in Flanders and South Africa align with those from Japan, Spain, Pakistan, India, and Saudi Arabia, showing a 25%–43% prevalence [ 13 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The available literature on HV severity is limited. HV severity scores for moderate and severe HV in both cohorts matched those of Japanese residents in a mountain village, except for mild HV at 66.3% in the Japanese cohort and 40.7% and 38.2% in the Flemish and South African cohorts [ 35 ]. Both studies had predominantly female participants; however, the Japanese study also included individuals with knee osteoarthritis, a condition associated with increased HV severity [ 35 ]. In South Africa, 90.9% of children and adolescents are reported to be habitually barefoot [ 26 ]. The older South African cohort showed a similar lifelong barefoot tendency, in contrast to the Flemish population. Previous studies have reported associations between footwear habits and HV prevalence, with a higher HV prevalence observed in populations with prolonged footwear use and structural adaptations linked to the frequency of footwear exposure [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Based on this literature, it can be hypothesized that greater exposure to barefoot conditions may be associated with a lower prevalence of HV deformity; however, similar HV prevalence rates were observed in the Flemish and South African cohorts. Habitually barefoot populations demonstrate differences in foot morphology, including foot length, width, and dynamic arch indexes, compared to predominantly shod populations [ 26 , 39 ]. Although footwear design in South Africa has been reported to rely on European datasets [ 28 ], it has been suggested that when footwear is worn, mismatches between foot morphology and footwear may occur. However, this study did not assess footwear fit, and no conclusions can be drawn regarding its contribution. Previous studies have reported associations between HV deformity and footwear characteristics, such as narrow toe boxes and elevated heels [ 14 , 17 , 19 , 37 , 40 , 41 ]; however, these factors were not evaluated in the present study. Sex significantly influenced HV prevalence and severity in both cohorts, with females demonstrating higher percentages of mild and moderate HV than males. This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting a higher HV deformity among women [ 9 , 13 , 14 , 35 , 36 , 38 ]. While prior research has suggested associations with the aforementioned footwear characteristics, as well as anatomical and hormonal factors [ 42 ], the current study did not assess footwear characteristics and therefore cannot determine their contribution. HV prevalence and severity increased with age, consistent with previous studies [ 9 , 12 , 14 , 37 , 38 ]. The cohorts exhibited differences in peak age: South Africans demonstrated the highest prevalence and moderate HV severity in the 80+ age group, while the Flemish cohort peaked in the 75–79 age group with severe HV deformity. The prevalence of HV has previously been linked to increased age, which supports the increase in HV prevalence in the 80+ age group [ 9 , 33 ]; however, other studies have also reported peaks in HV prevalence as early as 61–70 years of age [ 43 ]. The reasons for these discrepancies remain unclear and may be related to population‐specific factors or sampling variations, including potential selection bias in older age groups. These differences could also be related to variations in the individuals studied or exposure to different footwear conditions during early life. Prevalence was inversely associated with increasing BMI categories for both males and females, consistent with the findings reported by Dufour et al. [ 14 ], who also reported a negative association between HV prevalence and BMI for both sexes. Participants in the underweight and ideal BMI categories exhibited the highest prevalence and greater percentages of moderate and severe HV deformity, whereas those in the overweight category demonstrated the lowest prevalence and highest percentage of no or mild HV deformity. The reason for this inverse association remains unclear. Previous studies have reported inconsistent associations between BMI and HV, suggesting that BMI is likely a complex and context‐dependent factor in HV development, with no consistently established single mechanism. Furthermore, no sex‐specific pattern was observed in the association between hallux valgus and BMI in this study. This contrasts with the findings of Nguyen et al. [ 15 ], who reported sex‐specific associations. This aligns with the broader heterogeneity in literature. 4.1. Significance This study provides updated prevalence data for older adults and highlights the associations with age, sex, and body mass index. Given the high recurrence rate of HV following surgery, these findings could aid in risk assessment and patient education and ultimately address the burden of HV in older populations. While this study contributes to the limited research comparing intercontinental footwear habits between older South African and Flemish populations, being habitually barefoot did not appear to have a protective effect against the development of HV deformity. Further research incorporating a detailed assessment of footwear characteristics is needed to understand these relationships. Finally, this study found that these cohorts differ from previously reported continental averages, suggesting that HV prevalence data may be underrepresented within continents and highlighting the need for region‐specific studies. 4.2. Limitations This study had several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. A limitation of this study is the use of self‐assessed HV classification using the Manchester scale. This tool has demonstrated good reliability and validity and is widely used in epidemiological research. It offers several important advantages, including being non‐invasive, avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, and enabling standardized assessment and comparison across large populations. However, although the validity of the Manchester Scale has been demonstrated, the reliability of participant self‐assessment has not yet been fully established. Future studies should further evaluate the reliability of the Manchester Scale when used for self‐assessment. In addition, the Manchester scale is based on visual assessment of forefoot morphology and does not include radiographic or clinical confirmation. It may therefore not distinguish hallux valgus from hallux rigidus, which can present similarly in older adults, introducing potential misclassification and residual confounding. HV prevalence estimates therefore reflect deformity classification rather than clinically or radiographically confirmed diagnosis and should be interpreted accordingly. Second, the cohorts were compared according to HV severity by including both feet of each participant. Nine bilateral severity scenarios were created, resulting in some groups being small and limiting the ability to perform meaningful statistical comparisons. These groups were combined into four categories: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Consequently, factors potentially impacting HV severity were reported descriptively rather than tested inferentially. Third, engaging with older participants presented inherent limitations, such as retrospective reporting of footwear habits, particularly from their younger years. Due to the long recall period, exposure misclassification is likely, with a probable reduced accuracy of footwear use. However, as this limitation applied equally across the study groups, it is unlikely to have introduced a systematic bias between cohorts but may have reduced the observed associations between footwear exposure and HV. Despite this, the findings align with previous South African studies on the footwear habits of South African and German children. Additionally, challenges arose concerning the technological skills required to complete an online questionnaire. Although printed copies were made available, they were seldom requested, and incomplete responses could not be pursued further because of the anonymous and voluntary nature of the study design. Fourth, the flyers mentioned the aim to investigate risk factors for developing foot deformities, which could make those with deformities more likely to respond, and therefore create a selection bias. Fifth, the cross‐sectional design of this study allowed the identification of associations between HV and factors such as age, sex, and BMI; however, it did not permit conclusions about causality. Sixth, we used a convenience sample, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other populations or to the broader national context. Finally, although a priori calculations suggested that 200 participants per cohort were required to detect a 10% difference in prevalence with 80% power, the achieved sample size was smaller than anticipated. While the cohorts were relatively balanced, certain subgroups contained limited numbers, particularly South African males with moderate and severe HV. Similar constraints were observed in smaller age groups with moderate and severe HV, notably the Flemish 60–64 and 80+ groups. These underpowered subgroups may have reduced statistical power and estimate precision, potentially limiting the ability to detect small between‐group differences and warranting cautious interpretation of these findings. 5. Conclusion To our knowledge, this study represents the first comparative analysis of HV prevalence and severity between older adults from Flanders, Belgium, and the Western Cape, South Africa. Despite significant differences in lifelong footwear habits, with the South African cohorts reporting greater frequency of barefoot walking, both groups exhibited similar HV prevalence and severity. These findings reinforce the multifactorial nature of HV, confirming that increased prevalence and severity are associated with advancing age, female sex, and lower or ideal body mass index. This study underscores the importance of considering age, sex, BMI, and cumulative footwear exposure to address the burden of HV in older populations. Author Contributions Marise Carina Breet: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, validation, visualization. Benedicte Vanwanseele: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, validation, visualization, writing – review and editing. Hylton B. Menz: conceptualization, supervision, validation, visualization, writing – review and editing. Tonya M. Esterhuizen: formal analysis, validation, writing – review and editing. Ranel Venter: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, validation, visualization, writing – review and editing. Funding The authors have nothing to report. Ethics Statement This study received approval from the Health Research Ethics Committee at Stellenbosch University (protocol no: S23/07/150 (PhD)), KU Leuven's Privacy and Ethics platform (PRET), and the Social and Societal Ethics Committee (SMEC) of KU Leuven (protocol no: G‐2024‐7981‐R3 (AMD)). The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki principles. All participants provided written informed consent before their participation. Consent All participants provided written informed consent to the publication of the results. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgments We extend our gratitude to the participants and authorities who provided access and assistance during testing. During the preparation of this work, the authors utilized Paperpal to enhance language and readability. Following this process, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and accept full responsibility for its accuracy. Data Availability Statement Data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request. References 1. Coughlin M. J., “Hallux Valgus,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78, no. 6 (1996): 932–966, 10.2106/00004623-199606000-00018. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 2. Nix S. E., Vicenzino B. T., and Smith M. D., “Foot Pain and Functional Limitation in Healthy Adults With Hallux Valgus: A Cross‐Sectional Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 13, no. 197 (2012): 197, 10.1186/1471-2474-13-197. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 3. Menz H. B., Roddy E., Thomas E., and Croft P. R., “Impact of Hallux Valgus Severity on General and Foot‐Specific Health‐Related Quality of Life,” Arthritis Care & Research 63, no. 3 (2011): 396–404, 10.1002/acr.20396. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 4. Nishimura A., Ito N., Nakazora S., Kato Ko, Ogura T., and Sudo A., “Does Hallux Valgus Impair Physical Function?,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 19, no. 1 (2018): 174, 10.1186/s12891-018-2100-0. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 5. Menz H. B. and Lord S. R., “Gait Instability in Older People With Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International 26, no. 6 (2005): 483–489, 10.1177/107110070502600610. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 6. Menz H. B., Auhl M., and Spink M. J., “Foot Problems as a Risk Factor for Falls in Community‐Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Maturitas 118 (2018): 7–14, 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.001. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 7. Hurn S. E., Vicenzino B. T., and Smith M. D., “Non‐Surgical Treatment of Hallux Valgus: A Current Practice Survey of Australian Podiatrists,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 9, no. 1 (2016): 16, 10.1186/s13047-016-0146-5. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 8. Dias C. G., Godoy‐Santos A. L., Ferrari J., Ferretti M., and Lenza M., “Surgical Interventions for Treating Hallux Valgus and Bunions,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7, no. 7 (2024): CD013726, 10.1002/14651858.CD013726.pub2. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 9. Cai Y., Song Y., He M., et al., “Global Prevalence and Incidence of Hallux Valgus: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 16, no. 1 (2023): 63, 10.1186/s13047-023-00661-9. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 10. Roddy E., Zhang W., and Doherty M., “Prevalence and Associations of Hallux Valgus in a Primary Care Population,” Arthritis & Rheumatism 59, no. 6 (2008): 857–862, 10.1002/art.23709. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 11. Hsu Y. H., Liu Y., Hannan M. T., et al., “Genome‐Wide Association Meta‐Analyses to Identify Common Genetic Variants Associated With Hallux Valgus in Caucasian and African Americans,” Journal of Medical Genetics 52, no. 11 (2015): 762–769, 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103142. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 12. Menz H. B., Marshall M., Thomas M. J., Rathod‐Mistry T., Peat G. M., and Roddy E., “Incidence and Progression of Hallux Valgus: A Prospective Cohort Study,” Arthritis Care & Research 75, no. 1 (2022): 166–173, 10.1002/acr.24754. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 13. Gonzalez‐Martin C., Alonso‐Tajes F., Pérez‐García S., et al., “Hallux Valgus in a Random Population in Spain and its Impact on Quality of Life and Functionality,” Rheumatology International 37, no. 11 (2017): 1899–1907, 10.1007/s00296-017-3817-z. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 14. Dufour A. B., Casey V. A., Golightly Y. M., and Hannan M. T., “Characteristics Associated With Hallux Valgus in a Population‐Based Foot Study of Older Adults,” Arthritis Care & Research 66, no. 12 (2014): 1880–1886, 10.1002/acr.22391. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 15. Nguyen U. S., Hillstrom H. J., Li W., et al., “Factors Associated With Hallux Valgus in a Population‐Based Study of Older Women and Men: The MOBILIZE Boston Study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 18, no. 1 (2010): 41–46, 10.1016/j.joca.2009.07.008. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 16. Kinz W., Groll‐Knapp E., and Kundi M., “Hallux Valgus in Pre‐School‐Aged Children: The Effects of Too‐Short Shoes on the Hallux Angle and the Effects of Going Barefoot on Podiatric Health,” Footwear Science 13, no. 1 (2020): 29–42, 10.1080/19424280.2020.1853826. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 17. Klein C., Groll‐Knapp E., Kundi M., and Kinz W., “Increased Hallux Angle in Children and its Association With Insufficient Length of Footwear: A Community Based Cross‐Sectional Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 10, no. 1 (2009): 159, 10.1186/1471-2474-10-159. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 18. Munteanu S. E., Menz H. B., Wark J. D., et al., “Hallux Valgus, by Nature or Nurture? A Twin Study,” Arthritis Care & Research 69, no. 9 (2017): 1421–1428, 10.1002/acr.23154. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 19. Carvalho K. A. M., Mann T. S., Talaski G. M., et al., “Relationship Between High Heels and Hallux Valgus Deformity. Fact or Fiction? A 3‐Dimensional Weight‐Bearing CT Assessment,” Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics 8, no. 4 (2023): 2473011423S00397, 10.1177/2473011423s00397. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 20. Shine I. B., “Incidence of Hallux Valgus in a Partially Shoe‐Wearing Community,” British Medical Journal 1, no. 5451 (1965): 1648–1650, 10.1136/bmj.1.5451.1648. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 21. Zipfel B. and Berger L. R., “Shod Versus Unshod: The Emergence of Forefoot Pathology in Modern Humans?,” Foot 17, no. 4 (2007): 205–213, 10.1016/j.foot.2007.06.002. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 22. Yu G., Fan Y., Fan Y., et al., “The Role of Footwear in the Pathogenesis of Hallux Valgus: A Proof‐of‐Concept Finite Element Analysis in Recent Humans and Homo naledi,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020): 648, 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00648. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 23. Maclennan R., “Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in a Neolithic Guinea Population,” Lancet 25, no. 1 (1966): 1398–1400, 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)90304-7. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 24. Gottschalk F. A. B., Sallis J. G., Beighton P. H., and Solomon L., “A Comparison of the Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in Three South African Populations,” SA Mediese Tydskruf 57, no. 10 (1980): 355–357, https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA20785135_15759 . [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 25. Gottschalk F. A. B., Solomon L., and Beighton P. H., “The Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in South African Males,” in SA Mediese Tydskrif (SA Medical Journal, 1984), 725–726. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 26. Hollander K., de Villiers J. E., Sehner S., et al., “Growing‐Up (Habitually) Barefoot Influences the Development of Foot and Arch Morphology in Children and Adolescents,” Scientific Reports 7, no. 1 (2017): 8079, 10.1038/s41598-017-07868-4. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 27. Buldt A. K. and Menz H. B., “Incorrectly Fitted Footwear, Foot Pain and Foot Disorders: A Systematic Search and Narrative Review of the Literature,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 11, no. 43 (2018): 1–11, 10.1186/s13047-018-0284-z. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 28. Breet M. C., De Villiers E., and Venter R., “South African School Shoes: Urgent Changes Required for Our Children's Unique Feet,” South African Journal of Science 119, no. 9/10 (2023), 10.17159/sajs.2023/16295. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 29. Kiskac M., Soysal P., Smith L., Capar E., and Zorlu M., “What Is the Optimal Body Mass Index Range for Older Adults?,” Annuals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 26, no. 1 (2022): 49–57, 10.4235/agmr.22.0012. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 30. Hollander K., van der Zwaard B. C., de Villiers J. E., Braumann K.‐M., Venter R., and Zech A., “The Effects of Being Habitually Barefoot on Foot Mechanics and Motor Performance in Children and Adolescents Aged 6–18 Years: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Cross‐Sectional Study (Barefoot LIFE Project),” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 9, no. 1 (2016): 36, 10.1186/s13047-016-0166-1. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 31. Menz H. B. and Munteanu S. E., “Radiographic Validation of the Manchester Scale for the Classification of Hallux Valgus Deformity,” Rheumatology 44, no. 8 (2005): 1061–1066, 10.1093/rheumatology/keh687. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 32. Menz H. B., Fotoohabadi M. R., Wee E., and Spink M. J., “Validity of Self‐Assessment of Hallux Valgus Using the Manchester Scale,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11, no. 215 (2010): 1–6, 10.1186/1471-2474-11-215. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 33. Nix S., Smith M., and Vicenzino B., “Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 3, no. 21 (2010): 1–9, 10.1186/1757-1146-3-21. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 34. Charan J. and Biswas T., “How to Calculate Sample Size for Different Study Designs in Medical Research?,” Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 35, no. 2 (2013): 121–126, 10.4103/0253-7176.116232. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 35. Nishimura A., Fukuda A., Nakazora S., et al., “Prevalence of Hallux Valgus and Risk Factors Among Japanese Community Dwellers,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 19, no. 2 (2014): 257–262, 10.1007/s00776-013-0513-z. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 36. Alkhaibary A., Alghanim F., Najdi A., Alanazi K., and Alkenani N.S., “Hallux Valgus in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Its Associations,” Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research 3, no. 3 (2019): 292, 10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_47_19. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 37. Iftikhar A., Aslam S., Amjad F., Jabbar S., and Alam A., “Prevalence and Factors Leading to Hallux Valgus in Adults,” Pakistan Biomedical Journal 5, no. 6 (2022): 224–228, 10.54393/pbmj.v5i6.564. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 38. Gawande K. B., Mungikar S., Hotwani R., Ingle S., and Kulkarni C. A., “Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in Normal Individuals,” Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences 10, no. 4 (2021): 3138–3141, 10.22270/jmpas.V10I4.1263. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 39. Breet M. C. and Venter R., “Are Habitually Barefoot Children Compelled to Wear Ill‐Fitting School Shoes? A Cross‐Sectional Study,” BMC Pediatrics 22, no. 1 (2022): 187, 10.1186/s12887-022-03263-9. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 40. Menz H. B., Roddy E., Marshall M., et al., “Epidemiology of Shoe Wearing Patterns Over Time in Older Women: Associations With Foot Pain and Hallux Valgus,” Journals of Gerontology:Medical Sciences 71, no. 12 (2016): 1682–1687, 10.1093/gerona/glw004. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 41. Javaid Q., “Associated Factors of Hallux Valgus and the Deformity Impact on Quality of Life With and Without Surgery—A Review,” Israel Medical Journal 13, no. 3 (2021): 222–226, https://www.imj.com.pk/wp‐content/uploads/2021/10/16.‐RA‐50‐04‐21‐Associated‐factors‐of‐Hallux‐Valgus‐and‐the‐Deformity‐impact.pdf . [ Google Scholar ] 42. Ferrari J., Hopkinson D. A., and Linney A. D., “Size and Shape Differences Between Male and Female Foot Bones: Is the Female Foot Predisposed to Hallux Abducto Valgus Deformity?,” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 94, no. 5 (2004): 434–452, 10.7547/0940434. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 43. Okwara B. O., Asomugha A. L., Okwesili I. C., Enemuo V. C., Okwesili O. R., and Nnama T. N., “Prevalence of Hallux Valgus Deformity in Enugu Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria,” International Journal of Medicine and Health Development 30, no. 4 (2025): 433–437, 10.4103/ijmh.ijmh_103_24. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] Associated Data This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article. Data Availability Statement Data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request. Articles from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley ACTIONS View on publisher site PDF (1.4 MB) Cite Collections Permalink RESOURCES Similar articles Cited by other articles Links to NCBI Databases Follow NCBI NCBI on X (formerly known as Twitter) NCBI on Facebook NCBI on LinkedIn NCBI on GitHub NCBI RSS feed Connect with NLM NLM on X (formerly known as Twitter) NLM on Facebook NLM on YouTube National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers NLM NIH HHS USA.gov Back to Top
Related documents
- Hallux valgus measurements using weight-bearing computed tomography: what changes?#26155
- Feasibility and acceptability of the Health Assessment Tool (HAT) in Swedish primary care: insights into older patients' needs and professional perspectives.#284904
- Prevalence of five common clinical abnormalities in very elderly people: population based cross sectional study#652647
- Prevalence of Two Major Geriatric Syndromes: Sarcopenia and Frailty#810741
- Health Assessment Study (0954-946)#325167
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive