OpenAlex
metadata only
Exploration of Intrinsic Relevance Judgments by Legal Professionals in Information Retrieval Systems
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval#335455
- WARP: Wasserstein-Aligned RAG for Population Opinions#1062989
- Annotated Surrogate Retrieval for Polish Statutory Law#818963
- Annotated Surrogate Retrieval for Polish Statutory Law#808971
- When Does Dense Retrieval Need Asymmetric Geometry? A Bias-Variance Theory of Shared and Dual Projections#1116819
Record · ID 279135
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive