Harvard DASH
metadata only
Why It’s Important To Be Wrong: Systematic Bias and the Limits of Accuracy in 2024 Pre-Election Presidential Polls
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dynamics of sociopolitical polarization and effects of misperception-correcting information around the 2022 Brazilian elections.#266809
- How Model Choice Obscures Forecast Uncertainty: The Rashomon Effect and the 2026 Senate#390042
- Replication Data for: Whistling Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Optimism Bias and Political Beliefs in the United States#486235
- Directional Bias in Electoral Polls: A Standardized Framework and the Introduction of the Matute Unit#141301
- Prediction Markets? The Accuracy and Efficiency of Political Prediction Markets in the 2024 Presidential Election#276731
Record · ID 322637
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive