NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Teacher feedback VS AI-assisted peer feedback in L2 writing: A quasi-experimental study in a Chinese University.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ELT TEACHER EDUCATION: TOWARDS DEVELOPING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK#301755
- Are students dependent on AI in writing courses? Analyzing factors influencing dependence on generative AI through the I-PACE model.#1097724
- Bridging the human-AI gap: the role of perceived teacher support in shaping EFL learners' willingness to engage in collaborative writing.#338340
- Closing the Model Text Gap: A Feasibility Pilot of AI-Integrated Analytical Writing Instruction for L2 Learners#450616
- Analyzing the Transition From Writing Center Tutor to Graduate Student Instructor#651018
Record · ID 323202
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive