OSF
open access
Psychological features of dispute content and public acceptance of AI in legal adjudication: evidence for systematic variation beyond individual differences
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making#269782
- Endowing Artificial Intelligence with legal subjectivity#270025
- The Possibility and Necessity of the Human-Centered AI in Legal Theory and Practice#335537
- Can Legal AI Know When It Is Wrong? And Do Students Know When It Is?#662262
- Can Legal AI Know When It Is Wrong? And Do Students Know When It Is?#480109
Record · ID 323809
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive