Figshare
open access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Multi-stakeholder perspectives on models of in-person and remote cochlear implant aftercare and the opportunities and challenges for change
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The role of perceived competence in remote cochlear implant aftercare: a mixed-methods study.#289043
- Evaluation of tip fold over in 1,575 cochlear implant electrode arrays#1106546
- Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming (IGCIP)#992079
- Electrocochleography Function for Monitoring Residual Hearing#892358
- Comparative Analysis of Hearing Outcomes: Robotic vs. Manual Insertion of Cochlear Implants#875031
Record · ID 337323
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive