NCBI PubMed Central
open access
ChatGPT in urogynecology: Comparing large language model responses to human experts.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large language models for breast cancer treatment planning: a blinded real-world evaluation of DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and oncologist recommendations.#371548
- A systematic comparison of ChatGPT and DeepSeek for guideline-based question answering in obstetric anesthesia.#305334
- St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus-Based Clinical Decision Validation: Concordance Assessment Between Deep Large Language Model Outputs and Global Expert Panel Recommendations.#25838
- Large language models decode narrative pathology reports to define clinically relevant subtypes in IgA nephropathy.#636653
- Mitigating hallucinations in synthesized clinical texts to improve multimodal deep learning for dermatology.#308866
Record · ID 364783
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive