OSF
open access
Evaluating methods for testing publication bias in meta-analyses with confounding covariates: A simulation study
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Correcting for publication bias in multivariate and multilevel meta-analysis: A multivariate step function selection model approach#16329
- Judging research on its own merits: How MetaROR supports better research assessment#443591
- Who is more likely to make causal claims in observational studies? The role of author experience, team size, cultural background, and gender in scientific framing.#449708
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses#6267
- Does Increasing Sample Size Inevitably Lead to Statistical Significance? Insights From a Monte Carlo Simulation Study for Medical Research Design.#385246
Record · ID 385646
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive