Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
Comparative analysis of stationary and mobile 3D concrete printing in construction
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Buildability Assessment of 3D-Printed Concrete Structures Using Smoothed Mohr-Coulomb Plasticity with Isotropic Hardening#984585
- MEP Comparison of 3D Printed Homes and Stick Framed Homes#1115385
- A semi-empirical framework for modeling anisotropy, spatial variation and failure mechanisms in 3D printed concrete#397882
- Origin and control of anisotropy in three dimensional printing of structural ceramics#644970
- Creating an equation to simply approximate 3D-printed component strength by-hand dependent on planned component print orientation, print temperature, infill percentage, and surface quality for polylactic acid fused-deposition modeling printing#823246
Record · ID 419398
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive