Zenodo (CERN)
open access
CC BY 4.0
COGNITIVE LIBERTY AND MENTAL PRIVACY IN PUBLIC LAW: CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON NEUROTECHNOLOGY AFTER THE 2025 UNESCO RECOMMENDATION
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology#467880
- Privacy: Restrictions and Decisions#748231
- National Security, Narcissism, Voyeurism, and Kyllo: How Intelligence Programs and Social Norms are Affecting the Fourth Amendment#1021735
- Who Has the Power to Enforce Private Rights?#669618
- Judicial Activism and Fourteenth Amendment Privacy Claims: The Allure of Originalism and the Unappreciated Promise of Constrained Nonoriginalism#493779
Record · ID 438357
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive